Suscribe to Weekly RiverCitiesReader.com Updates
* indicates required

View previous campaigns.

Latest Comments

American Idle - Page 2 PDF Print E-mail
Commentary/Politics - Guest Commentaries
Written by Keith Johnson   
Tuesday, 23 November 2010 08:57

We’re closing in on the 20th anniversary of the Rodney King beatings in Los Angeles. Almost two decades ago, the American public was shocked and appalled as they watched one of the first incidents of police brutality to ever be caught on tape, broadcast on television screens across the nation.

The ensuing trial was held in a predominantly white, suburban city (Simi Valley) that is a well known “Cop Land,” where police officers from three counties reside in great numbers. The biased trial found the officers “not guilty” on all counts.

Public outrage at the verdicts sparked the L.A. riots of 1992 that found thousands of people taking to the streets. Businesses were looted, cars were torched, and widespread violence spread through the city over a period of six hellish days.

Some may say that the way the public expressed its discontent was not constructive – but the people certainly made their point. The United States Department of Justice was forced to bring federal charges against the four officers for civil-rights violations. Two of the four officers were acquitted, but two were convicted and handed 30-month prison sentences.

If the Rodney King beatings were caught on tape today, it would not even make the evening news. The circumstances leading up to the arrest of King would most certainly be enough to close the books on any further inquiry, and any ensuing protests would be met with even more brutality from the police.

The King case pales in comparison to some of the more recent incidents of alleged police brutality.

Take the case of Jordan Miles, for instance. Miles, an 18-year-old black student with no criminal record, was simply walking down a street in Pittsburgh when he was approached by three plainclothes police officers. According to Miles, the officers did not identify themselves. Instead, they shouted, “Where’s the money? Where’s the gun?.Where’s the drugs?” Thinking he was about to be robbed, Miles ran and slipped on the ice. Before he could get to his feet, the officers converged and began beating, kicking, and choking him. They also used a Taser, thinking that he was concealing a weapon. No weapon was found. Miles sustained severe facial injuries. His face was swollen, almost to the point of being unrecognizable, and he continues to suffer from physical and psychological pain caused by the assault. Eight months have passed, and not one of the officers has been held accountable.

Compare that to the King case. King, a convicted felon, led police on a high-speed chase. When he was finally stopped, he emerged from the vehicle and taunted the police officers. The officers “swarmed” him and proceeded to beat him repeatedly with batons. At one point, when it was apparent that King was still making attempts to resist, a Taser was used twice in an attempt to incapacitate him. It was later determined that King had a blood alcohol level that was almost twice the legal limit.

In reaction to the Miles brutality case, a few peaceful protests and marches were held in the local community but received very little press. In reaction to the King case, part of an entire city burned to the ground, and the riots and subsequent trials were nationwide spectacles.

American attitudes have changed. Today, the public cowers in fear of their oppressors. What’s worse is that a vast majority will stick out their tongues, as they lie bloodied on the street, and lick the boot of the man who put them there.

Late last September, Gene Cranick of Obion County, Tennessee, watched his home burn to the ground as firefighters from neighboring South Fulton stood by without lifting a finger to put out the blaze.

There seemed to have been a problem with a $75 annual fee that Cranick apparently forgot to pay for fire services extended to residents who live outside the city limits.

In addition to his house and all of his belongings going up in smoke, three family dogs and a cat shared the same fate.

But instead of expressing outrage, the browbeaten property owners actually came to the defense of the apathetic public servants.

Cranick’s wife, Paulette, doesn’t blame the firefighters: “They’re doing what they are told to do. It’s not their fault.”

How have we come to adopt these kinds of attitudes? Where is the public outrage? Is there any limit to what the American people will put up with?

Part of the problem stems from our society turning from one that loves liberty to one that loves the gifts that liberty brings.

For well over a century, social engineers have indoctrinated Americans into believing that indulgence is synonymous with freedom. But nothing can be further from the truth. Freedom delivers one from dependency, while indulgence delivers one into it.

John Adams, an American statesman and champion of independence, feared that the American people would some day enjoy their newfound freedoms but neglect the daily struggle required to protect them. Adams was well aware of the dangers of complacency and warned that a society that chose indulgence over vigilance would quickly fall into the hands of tyrants, who would deliver a once-free people back into the chains of bondage: “When the people give way, their deceivers, betrayers, and destroyers press upon them so fast that there is no resisting afterwards. The nature of the encroachment upon the American Constitution is such as to grow every day more and more encroaching. Like a cancer, it eats faster and faster every hour.”

Adams went on to describe what would happen to that society once these destructive influences took hold: “The people grow less steady, spirited, and virtuous, the seekers more numerous and more corrupt, and every day increases the circles of their dependents and expectants, until virtue, integrity, public spirit, simplicity, and frugality become the objects of ridicule and scorn, and vanity, luxury, foppery, selfishness, meanness, and downright venality swallow up the whole society.”

This is where we are today. We have become a self-defeating society, drunk off the spoils left to us by our forefathers. We have fallen prey to an elitist cartel of bankers and warmongers who have looted, and continue to loot, the population of its wealth and treasure.

But it isn’t too late to turn things around.

Right now, the American people have an opportunity to get back that old fighting spirit. On November 24, many traveling Americans can stand defiant against their tyrannical government.

“National Opt-Out Day” is something that everybody can get behind, regardless of their partisan politics. Finally, across the board, we have found an issue that all can agree upon. We are not terrorists, and we refuse to allow our government to treat us as such. Let us make the TSA a poster child for tyranny and the over reaching of our corrupt government.

If you travel this holiday, refuse to allow yourself to be degraded and poisoned by the cancer-inducing pornography scanners that have been installed in our nation’s airports. You won’t be alone. Perhaps that man or woman standing there next to you is someone you don’t see eye-to-eye with concerning the health-care bill. But at least you can agree that having your body ravaged by strangers is something that no one should be forced to endure. At least that’s a start.

It might be uncomfortable and inconvenient, but fighting for your liberty and freedom always has been – and it’s about time we started getting used to that.

This article originally appeared at RevoltOfThePlebs.com.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy