Suscribe to Weekly Updates
* indicates required

View previous campaigns.

Latest Comments

    Get a grip, I bet the other little girl who...
  • ...
    Love the show - Daniel Mansfield
  • On target
    Everyone I have shared your editorial finds it really close...
  • Retired teacher
    Loved reading how such an outstanding citizen was able to...
  • Re: name correction
    Thank you for bringing the error to our attention, Lorianne,...
Another Historic Opportunity PDF Print E-mail
Commentary/Politics - Editorials
Wednesday, 21 March 2007 02:18

On Monday, March 26, at 6:30 p.m. on the second floor of the River Music Experience, the City of Davenport is hosting a "kickoff" meeting that will commence a "public process to design the expansion of LeClaire Park." The city's news release reads: "With the pending departure of the Isle of Capri's Rhythm City gaming operation away from the riverfront, a historic opportunity exists for the community to gather and collectively share ideas to transform the soon-to-be vacated property to uses everyone can enjoy and be proud of." The city claims that no design consultants will be used to "develop the conceptual plans" to expand LeClaire Park. The staff will introduce the project and provide background information and a schedule of upcoming input sessions. The city states: "The project's focus will be to use a community-based, grassroots approach to help the city take the next step in the evolution of its magnificent Mississippi riverfront."

Well this is certainly good news. The key phrase in the news release is "uses everyone can enjoy and be proud of." Matt Flynn and Darrin Nordahl, from the city's Design Center office, will be facilitating the meetings. Some may remember the giant "push pin" sculpture concept that Flynn and Nordahl floated as one idea for the waterfront in question. Their creativity and out-of-the-box thinking on that should be applauded. Let's hope that the new blood that Flynn and Nordahl represent is allowed to flourish throughout this process, and that it is not yet another tummy rub for the public, while the real deal is sealed behind closed doors.

This is worth saying because of the previous hundreds of volunteer hours and the dozens of ideas this community has contributed at dozens of similar public-process meetings held previously. Were we all not attempting to develop concepts for usage that "everyone can enjoy and be proud of" back then, too? Were the River Vision and waterfront workshops that hundreds attended not also defined as "historic opportunities" for the community to "collectively share ideas"?

Let's hope that this public process will at a minimum summarize the hard work that has gone before, culling the high points of the River Vision waterfront-usage process and listing for review the dozens of ideas that the public contributed during the waterfront workshop the city hosted in April 2005. If they are not acknowledged or incorporated into this new pass at the riverfront, then what assurances does the public have that what they are contributing is being listened to and retained by the city now?

Comments (1)Add Comment
written by PE Dave, March 25, 2007
Revitalizing the riverfront is a big step that needs to be done very carefully so that people for many years to come can enjoy it. I am glad that our city leaders chose to get the public's input rather than design it themselves behind closed doors. We need to make this area a large park with many things to do - similar to central park in New York. We need to bulldoze everything between the dam and the ballpark except the band shell. That means the Dock, The Freight house, the old train station, and all the parking lots. Make people use the new garages and skywalk. Put in a conveyor like at airports, maybe a tram system from there. Put in trees, winding trails, picnic areas, a pond, places for food vendors. To avoid flooding, either design a levee that rises with the water or raise the ground with soil. It can be done. People don't need to see the river while driving down river drive in that area.

Write comment
smaller | bigger