Suscribe to Weekly RiverCitiesReader.com Updates
* indicates required

View previous campaigns.

Latest Comments

  • Buy Cheap Nuance PDF Converter Professional 5
  • Download Adobe Photoshop LightRoom 3 MAC
  • Buy Cheap Microsoft Office 2010 Professional with SP1 (32-bit & 64-bit)
  • Discount - Adobe Captivate CC
  • 219.95$ Adobe Creative Suite 5 Design Premium MAC cheap oem
  • Discount - Corel PDF Fusion
  • Discount - iSkysoft iMedia Converter 2 Mac
  • Discount - Adobe Presenter 9
  • Discount - Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium
  • Buy Roxio Creator 2012 Pro (en)
  • Discount - DAZ Bryce 6.1
  • Davenport’s Planned News Site: A Bold, Unworkable Idea, Repackaged PR, or ... ? PDF Print E-mail
    Commentary/Politics - Guest Commentaries
    Written by Jeff Ignatius   
    Wednesday, 06 August 2014 09:47

    How would the City of Davenport have covered the recent vetoes by Mayor Bill Gluba of the Dock development plan and the St. Ambrose University rezoning request for a new stadium? And how would it have covered Gluba’s proposal to bring illegal immigrants to Davenport, which was – to put it mildly – poorly received by the city council?

    These were the questions that came to mind with the revelation by the Quad-City Times’ Barb Ickes (on the same day as the vetoes) that the Fiscal Year 2015 city budget includes $178,000 for what she described as “a news-based Web site ... [to] shine new light on positive and negative city happenings.”

    It’s clear that the site is an attempt to, at least in part, bypass the traditional news media and speak directly to constituents about good things city government is doing and positive developments in Davenport – without that pesky “other side” of the story. And, given our local television stations’ tendency to air unsourced and vaguely sourced stories, one might infer that another motivation is giving those broadcast news operations easily adaptable material that would warmly present Davenport.

    But this idea was also pitched by city staff quoted in the article as “bold” and a “deep dive,” words that suggest ambition beyond marketing. As Davenport Business Development Manager (and former daily-newspaper reporter) Tory Brecht said: “As far as we can tell, no U.S. city has embarked on this effort.”

    The news site is supposed to be launched in the next few months, and of course it’s impossible to pass judgment on it without actually seeing the thing.

    Yet the twin aims of the initiative seem fundamentally incompatible, and it’s hard to envision how the nobler of these goals can be accomplished given the inherent lack of independence in a city-run “news” operation.

    And that’s why I return to the Dock, the St. Ambrose stadium, and the Gluba immigration proposal. These were the city’s big stories last month, and one can’t envision a Davenport news site ignoring them while retaining its credibility. But I can’t for the life of me figure out how it would have covered them.

     
    What I Don’t Like About Life in America PDF Print E-mail
    Commentary/Politics - Guest Commentaries
    Written by John W. Whitehead   
    Wednesday, 23 July 2014 10:06

    There’s a lot to love about America and its people: their pioneering spirit, their entrepreneurship, their ability to think outside the box, their passion for the arts, etc. Increasingly, however, I find things I don’t like about living in a nation that has ceased to be a sanctuary for freedom.

    Here’s what I don’t like about living in America.

    I don’t like being treated as if my only value to the government is as a source of labor and funds. I don’t like being viewed as a consumer and bits of data. I don’t like being spied on and treated as if I have no right to privacy, especially in my own home.

    I don’t like government officials who lobby for my vote only to ignore me once elected. I don’t like having representatives unable and unwilling to represent me. I don’t like taxation without representation.

     
    The Libertarian and Catholic Social Teachings PDF Print E-mail
    Commentary/Politics - Guest Commentaries
    Written by David S. D’Amato   
    Wednesday, 25 June 2014 13:13

    Roman Catholic leaders from Cardinal Óscar Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga to Pope Francis himself have made news this year in their criticisms of supposed free-market economies, likening them to a form of idolatry that exploits and denies access to the poor. Because Catholic social teachings emphasize stewardship and aid to the less fortunate, clergymen such as Maradiaga have taken aim at perceived “structural causes for poverty.”

    It is in identifying these causes that the cardinal’s fulminations against free markets become problematic. While he can hardly be blamed for supposing that something in relations between rich and poor is amiss, it is his faith in the positive interventions of the state that is the “deception.” Ironically, the “free market” that Maradiaga so sincerely denounces is itself a product of deep and sustained state coercion on a scale not often recognized for what it is. We must therefore distinguish between two ways of employing the phrase “free market,” lest we fall into the trap that caught Maradiaga – the trap of opposing libertarianism in principle without actually understanding the economic system it prescribes.

     
    Has the Department of Homeland Security Become America’s Standing Army? PDF Print E-mail
    Commentary/Politics - Guest Commentaries
    Written by John W. Whitehead   
    Tuesday, 17 June 2014 13:32

    A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive, will not long be safe companions to liberty.” – James Madison

    Here [in New Mexico], we are moving more toward a national police force. Homeland Security is involved with a lot of little things around town. Somebody in Washington needs to call a timeout.” – Dan Klein, retired Albuquerque Police Department sergeant

    If the United States is a police state, then the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is its national police force, with all the brutality, ineptitude, and corruption such a role implies. In fact, although the DHS’s governmental bureaucracy may at times appear to be inept and bungling, it is ruthlessly efficient when it comes to building what the Founders feared most – a standing army on American soil.

    The third largest federal agency behind the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense, the DHS – with its 240,000 full-time workers, $61-billion budget, and sub-agencies that include the Coast Guard, Customs & Border Protection, Secret Service, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and Federal Emergency Management Agency – has been aptly dubbed a “runaway train.”

     
    Just Shoot: Turning Search Warrants into Death Warrants and SWAT Teams into Death Squads PDF Print E-mail
    Commentary/Politics - Guest Commentaries
    Written by John W. Whitehead   
    Monday, 09 June 2014 05:59

    “A government which will turn its tanks upon its people, for any reason, is a government with a taste of blood and a thirst for power and must either be smartly rebuked, or blindly obeyed in deadly fear.” – John Salter

    How many children, old people, and law-abiding citizens have to be injured, terrorized, or killed before we call a halt to the growing rash of police violence that is wracking the country? How many family pets have to be gunned down in cold blood by marauding SWAT teams before we declare such tactics off-limits? And how many communities have to be transformed into military outposts – complete with heavily armed police, military tanks, and “safety” checkpoints – before we draw that line in the sand that says “not in our town”?

    The latest incident happened last month in Atlanta, where a SWAT team attempting to execute a no-knock drug warrant in the middle of the night launched a flash-bang grenade into the targeted home, only to have it land in a crib where a 19-month-old baby lay sleeping. The grenade exploded, burning his face, lacerating his chest, and leaving him paralyzed. At the hospital, he was put in a medically induced coma.

    If this were the first instance of police overkill – if it were even the fifth – there might be hope of reforming our system of law enforcement. But what happened to this baby, whose life will never be the same, has become par for the course in a society that glorifies violence, turns a blind eye to government wrongdoing, and sanctions any act by law enforcement – no matter how misguided or wrong. As I detail in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, this state-sponsored violence is a necessary ingredient in any totalitarian regime to ensure a compliant, cowed, and fearful populace.

     
    << Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

    Page 1 of 85