- Buy OEM GibbsCAM 2014 32-bit
- Buy OEM Flash CS5: The Missing Manual
- 29.95$ Infinite Skills - Learning Adobe Audition CS6 cheap oem
- Buy FontLab Fontographer 5 MAC (en)
- Buy Symantec PCAnywhere 12.5 (en)
- Buy Runtime Revolution Enterprise 2.9 (en)
- Buy Lynda.com - MVC Frameworks for Building PHP Web Applications (en)
- Download Adobe Premiere Elements 9
- 9.95$ Lynda.com - C# Essential Training cheap oem
- Download Palm Pre: The Missing Manual
- Buy Cheap Sony ACID Pro 7
|Iowa Politics Roundup: Senate Trims House’s Budget-Cutting Package - Page 2|
|Commentary/Politics - Iowa Politics|
|Written by Lynn Campbell|
|Friday, 18 February 2011 14:35|
Page 2 of 2
Battle of the Abortion Bills Coming to a Head as Funnel Approaches
A decision will likely be made next week by House Republicans on whether they’ll move forward with legislation that bans abortions completely or from 20 weeks of pregnancy – a key emotional issue that has divided the caucus – while House Democrats are gearing up for the fight.
“With two weeks to go to the funnel, we’ll probably need to make a decision on something next week,” House Speaker Kraig Paulsen (R-Hiawatha) said Thursday. “We’re closer because the calendar has moved, but I don’t think either Leader [Linda] Upmeyer or myself have interjected ourselves into that discussion yet.”
Paulsen said a public hearing on the issue will be held on the issue, but it hasn’t been set yet.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (D-Des Moines) said House File 5, a bill aimed at prohibiting abortions for women who are at least 20 weeks pregnant, appears to have stalled a bit. That legislation stems from Nebraska-based abortion practitioner LeRoy Carhart proposing to open a new clinic in Council Bluffs.
Meanwhile, House File 153, which would ban all abortions, appears to be gaining steam.
“The Nebraska bill seems to have stalled a bit, and ... 29 sponsors of the House Republican caucus are pushing the ‘banning contraception’ bill that’s moving forward,” McCarthy said. “That seems to be gaining momentum. ... We’re not going to let that just go quietly.”
McCarthy said House File 153 would ban birth-control pills and has no exception for the life of the mother. Democrats have called for a public hearing, and McCarthy said their focus next week is to make sure the House chamber is packed full of people.
“It basically takes the 20-week bill and gets rid of the number ‘two,’” McCarthy said. “Very, very extreme.”
In an e-mail this week, Chuck Hurley and Danny Carroll of The Family Leader asked supporters to give lawmakers backing House File 153 encouragement and prayerful support. “The pro-abortion crowd will not be happy with passage of this legislation and will make a lot of noise in their efforts to oppose its passage,” they said.
Representative Beth Wessel-Kroeschell (D-Ames) voted against the bill in subcommittee this week and said Democrats have many concerns about the bill, which she said has the potential to impact all Iowans’ lives.
“It does not give a woman and her family the right to make decisions about her pregnancy, including if there is an ectopic pregnancy or for some other reason she may have her life endangered and her health endangered,” Wessel-Kroeschell said. “It also takes away options for couples and families who are having problems conceiving and may want to pursue infertility treatments.”
Paulsen called the criticism by Democrats “hyperbole.”
Workforce Development to Close 39 Offices
Iowa Workforce Development (IWD) says it will offer a “reformed and enhanced” delivery system for statewide workforce services when it closes 39 offices July 1.
Iowa’s current system has 55 field offices. The new system will provide 16 regional, integrated one-stop offices and more than 500 locally enhanced access points through such facilities as public libraries, Iowa State University Extension offices, and Iowa Career Access Points.
IWD officials said the system will have greater availability to the public with evening and weekend hours, something not available in the current delivery model.
“Iowa’s changing economy deserves an enhanced system that provides multiple access points for workforce services throughout the state while providing intensive, fully integrated services within the regional offices for those in need of additional services and training,” said Iowa Workforce Development Director Teresa Wahlert. “Iowa workers and businesses deserve a system concentrated on delivering services in the most customer-oriented, efficient, and cost-effective manner.”
But key Democrats who make spending decisions for state economic-development efforts and those in the Iowa House Rural Caucus decried the plan.
“Governor Branstad’s plan is disastrous to more than 100,000 Iowans who want to rejoin the workforce,” Senator Bill Dotzler (D-Waterloo), chair of the legislature’s economic-development budget subcommittee, and Representative Kirsten Running-Marquardt, the subcommittee’s ranking member, said in a joint statement. “The governor is pulling out the rug on Iowans by reducing their access to key services by closing 39 workforce-development offices, mostly in rural areas.”
Dotzler and Running-Marquardt said instead of increasing access to employment services for workers and businesses, the plan puts up more barriers for Iowans looking for a job and businesses trying to hire new workers. They said the plan eliminates job-development and -placement assistance, interviewing-skills workshops, and claims assistance. “Democrats flatly reject this scheme because it targets Iowans in rural areas and small towns,” they said. “We can do better.”
Members of the Iowa House Rural Caucus said the plan unfairly targets rural Iowa.
“With a growing economy and $900-million budget surplus, there is no reason to end critical job-training and -placement services for Iowans in rural communities,” said Representative Andrew Wenthe (D-Hawkeye), who chairs the House Democrats Rural Caucus. “Eliminating workforce offices in rural communities such as Oelwein, Estherville, New Hampton, and 36 others will make it even harder for Iowans looking for a good-paying job to secure 21st Century job skills and opportunities. This short-sighted and irresponsible decision is a slap in the face to rural Iowa.”
Filmmaker Pleads Guilty in Film-Office Case
Minnesota filmmaker Wendy Runge pleaded guilty late Wednesday afternoon to first-degree fraudulent practice concerning the film projects Run and Forever.
Runge, who was charged in connection with the Iowa Film Office scandal, faces up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. She is expected to cooperate and testify in the film-office investigation, and other charges against her will be dropped.
That’s far less than the 10 to 65 years Runge could have faced if convicted of five felony counts – one count of first-degree theft, three counts of first-degree fraudulent practice, and one count of ongoing criminal conduct.
Runge admitted in court that she made false statements to the state to procure state tax credits for both projects. She said she was directed to do so by then-Iowa Film Office Manager Tom Wheeler.
Prosecutors accused Runge, 45, of increasing the budget of the film The Scientist by $3.5 million to cash in on tax credits offered by the state. Runge, Chase Brandau, Matthias Saunders, and Zachary LeBeau own Polynation Pictures and produced the film The Scientist.
Brandau pleaded guilty to second-degree theft, and Saunders pleaded guilty to first-degree theft. Both agreed to continue to cooperate with the ongoing investigation of the Iowa Film Office case. Felony charges were dismissed against LeBeau in exchange for his cooperation.
University Officials Opposed to Selling Pollock Painting
University of Iowa officials were at the Iowa Capitol this week vigorously defending the value of the Jackson Pollock painting Mural, in the face of a bill that would require the Iowa Board of Regents to sell the painting and use the proceeds for scholarships for art students.
Sean O’Harrow, director of the University of Iowa Museum of Art and former director of the Figge Art Museum in Davenport – where Mural has been displayed – called the work the most famous painting in the state of Iowa and one of the most significant paintings in all of American art, adding that it has brought fame and credibility to the university and state. He said the sale would be an “act of vandalism” and would be “ripping out the heart of our teaching collection” and destroy the university’s reputation at a time when it is kicking off its largest fundraising campaign ever.
O’Harrow said the painting would likely be bid on by the richest people from China, Russia, and the Middle East. He said selling the painting would cause the University of Iowa Museum of Art to be de-accredited, the university to be blacklisted by other educational and cultural institutions, and insurance premiums to go up.
A House subcommittee approved House Study Bill 84 on a 2-1 vote and will advance to the House Appropriations Committee, despite opposition from university officials. Representative Pat Murphy (D-Dubuque) said he’s opposed to the bill, acknowledging that he doesn’t know much about art but saying the legislation is an attempt at micromanagement.
Iowa Board of Regents President David Miles told lawmakers that the proposal is a “profoundly bad idea.” He said the idea was examined by the Iowa Board of Regents in 2008 and determined to be not in the best interests of the University of Iowa or the state. He said a forced sale of the painting would break trust with those who have contributed to the arts at the U of I over the years, would chill any future donations, and may lead to litigation with the family that donated Mural to the University of Iowa.
Representative Ralph Watts (R-Adel), the bill’s floor manager, said he views potential sale of the Jackson Pollock painting as an opportunity to educate students and possibly provide tuition to a thousand art students. He questioned the current educational value of the painting that he said was appraised at $140 million.
“It’s not destroying the university at all,” Watts said.
Miles said the regents could certainly begin selling off assets. “However, short of that, and we are well short of that, we are under stress, we have lost appropriations from this body for the last decade or more, but we are still able to function, and it doesn’t make sense to me to begin to dismantle world-class programs when we do not need to do that,” Miles said.
This weekly summary comes from IowaPolitics.com, an online government and politics news service
Tags See All Tags