Latest Comments
|
| Why New Jersey’s Mess Matters to Illinois |
 |
 |
 |
| Commentary/Politics - Illinois Politics | |||
| Written by Rich Miller | |||
| Sunday, 21 February 2010 05:41 | |||
|
Decisions made by a governor in a far-away but strikingly similar state might actually influence our election right here in Illinois. Just a week or so after Governor Pat Quinn lays out his state budget blueprint next month, recently elected New Jersey governor Chris Christie will do the same. Illinois and New Jersey have more in common than you might think. They're not exactly alike by any means, but they're both Democratic-leaning states that have elected Republican governors in the past. They both have unemployment troubles, although New Jersey is better off than us right now, and they both have horrible state-budget problems. Illinois' budget crisis is somewhat worse than New Jersey's, but they're similar enough that the two governors' budget plans will undoubtedly be compared. Illinois' budget deficit for next fiscal year, which starts in July, is projected at somewhere around $13 billion. New Jersey's upcoming red-ink total will be about $11 billion. The two states' operating budgets are about the same size. Christie, a conservative Republican, has already ruled out any tax hikes to solve the problem and has vowed to allow a corporate-income-tax surcharge to expire. The liberal Democrat Quinn, on the other hand, is still talking about raising the income tax so he can avoid as many cuts as possible. A few days ago Christie issued an executive order declaring a "state of fiscal emergency." He froze school aid to districts that were running at least a 2-percent surplus, ordered a state spending freeze, and reserved for himself emergency powers needed to balance the current fiscal year's budget, among other things. The result, according to Christie, was $2.2 billion in savings -- which matches his current deficit. Illinois' current-fiscal-year deficit of $5 billion is much higher than New Jersey's, but Quinn has not yet taken any dramatic public action -- although the state has quietly shut off the money spigot to just about anything outside of employee payroll, general school aid, and most Medicaid reimbursements. Almost nobody else is getting a check. That's why universities are owed hundreds of millions of dollars, for instance, state workers are being forced to pay up-front for doctor visits, and legislators are discovering that their district-office landlords are being stiffed. So far, the reaction to Christie's actions in New Jersey has been mixed. The local media has mostly gushed over Christie's "bold" executive order, but the Democrat-controlled legislature was upset that the governor made the move without consulting it, and various interest groups are beginning to speak out in anger. What we are almost certain to get next month is a stark contrast in approaches. While Quinn will likely propose big cuts in his budget plan, including slashes to agency operating expenditures and the "suspension" for a year or two of a large number of state programs, new revenue sources will dampen the blow. New Jersey's Christie, on the other hand, will probably rely solely on steep cuts, "reforms," payment deferrals, and borrowing. So far, at least, Christie's promises and rhetoric match up pretty well with Senator Bill Brady, the presumptive Republican nominee for governor here. Brady has said that if he is elected he will cut taxes by at least a billion dollars, "reform" Medicaid to save as much as $1.8 billion, cut pension benefits, and make big state-agency cuts across the board. If Christie is successful in putting together a budget that isn't horrifically draconian, Brady can point to that example as something he could follow. However, I'm not sure that Christie can actually pull it off without coming across as too severe. The projected New Jersey budget deficit is more than a third of the state's entire operating budget. But New Jersey isn't Illinois, so I won't even pretend to know how that state runs. Its population is about a third less than ours, yet its operating budget is just as big, and it has more state employees, so there seems to be a lot more room to cut over there. If Christie does somehow succeed, Quinn's cut, defer, borrow, and tax plan will probably come under fire. If, on the other hand, Christie's budget is repulsively retrograde and doesn't stand the test of time, Quinn can claim some justification for his own approach, and Brady's promises could be undermined. Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax (a daily political newsletter) and TheCapitolFaxBlog.com. Trackback(0)
Comments (2)
  written by daddysteve, March 23, 2010
Gov. Christie seems to be exhibiting the responsibility his position requires. A quality sorely lacking in most republicrats these days. I'm sure the public unions have a different opinion. However,when your broke,your broke. We as a people just refuse to recognize this horrible truth.
Write comment
|
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Tags
Mike Jacobs voted twice against IL businesses using E Verify. Vershoore said he felt bad about voting against illegal having a driver's licenses which La Rasa started it. Lane Evans had an F on Numbers USA for being for illegal and amnesty.
This is not my father's Democratic Party when men were men and they took care of their own. They would never be for amnesty, illegal and foreign workers against the American workers and their families. Like these so called Democrats today. Tammacrats. Congress is Tammany Hill. White Wash House. Except although Tammany Hall was corrupt too they were for Legal immigrants. No such thing as a Democrat today.
But the ones who should pay for the IL deficit are clintons gore and the IL so called Democrats,because they are to blame for the deficit. Not the people of IL who have been their victims and suffered because of them.
Now Quinn wants the people of IL to suffer more and pay for some thing they did not do.