<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Speaker Urges Separation of Public Policy from Religious Rhetoric</title>
		<description>Comments for Speaker Urges Separation of Public Policy from Religious Rhetoric at http://www.rcreader.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.rcreader.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:15:50 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rcreader.com/news/speaker-urges-separation-of-public/#comment-81</link>
			<description>What else can one call &quot;these people&quot;?  Rather than calling them anything, why not engage what they are saying and respond to it?  Hopefully, you can do better than simple name calling. 

Why not offer some content of your own and explain why you think the way you do and why it is better?  Offer a perspective and a rational argument for it.  

Also consider that other people may have had the same experience you have had, and they may not understand what [b]you[/b] are talking about.  

I am not a liberal.  What are you talking about?  - Lars Rehnberg</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:58:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rcreader.com/news/speaker-urges-separation-of-public/#comment-80</link>
			<description>Anther silly liberal. What else can one call these people other than silly? Nothing they say or believe makes sense. In my almost eighty years I have never been able to understand what they are talking about.  - vincent garganza</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:04:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
