<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Harlequin Romance: &quot;The Dark Knight&quot;</title>
		<description>Comments for Harlequin Romance: &quot;The Dark Knight&quot; at http://www.rcreader.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.rcreader.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:46:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rcreader.com/movies/harlequin-romance-the-dark-knight/#comment-921</link>
			<description>As always great insight, and can't agree more about Ledger's performance. However, I think what's being lost in the obsession over the performance is how well written the part is. This was a chance of a lifetime, and he was up to the challenge. - Ron Barrett</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:23:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rcreader.com/movies/harlequin-romance-the-dark-knight/#comment-884</link>
			<description>Agreed Mike.  It was a hauntingly good performance.  Very few actors would ever dared to try and get to the psychological place in which Ledger must have had to journey to in able for him to play a character like that.  Like the line in Ghostbusters, 'There is no Dana...only Zule'...there was no Heath Ledger, only Joker, from the beganning to the end of the film. If I didn't know is was Ledger, I don't believe I would have ever guessed it. - Justin H</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:18:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
