<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>100 Favorite Movies, 2000-2009: Mike Schulz</title>
		<description>Comments for 100 Favorite Movies, 2000-2009: Mike Schulz at http://www.rcreader.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.rcreader.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:41:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.rcreader.com/movies/100-favorite-movies-mike-schulz/#comment-1793</link>
			<description>A bit dissapointing that &quot;Little Miss Sunshine&quot; and &quot;American Psycho&quot; didn't make the list. I'd have switched &quot;Knocked Up&quot; with &quot;The 40 Year Old Virgin&quot;. And I still don't get why &quot;Michael Clayton&quot; has gotten as much praise as it has (George Clooney is the same dude in every movie). But &quot;Inland Empire&quot; sucked. I liked the eeriness and the camera work, but considering the fact that I had to sit there for 4 hours, and that,these days, David Lynch only makes a film every presidential election, would it have killed him to include some type of plot? Something. Anything. Even one that makes little to no sense? But kudos to Mike for picking &quot;There Will Be Blood&quot; as his #1 (I agree). I remember when I went to see it when it first came to Davenport. Just as I was about to head into the theatre, this guy was looking at his ticket stub by the entrance, looked at me and asks &quot;there will be blood?&quot;-wondering if he had the right theatre. I replied: &quot;I hope so...&quot; I felt like clapping at the end. - Brad Vidmar</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:03:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
