Suscribe to Weekly Updates
* indicates required

View previous campaigns.

Latest Comments

    Get a grip, I bet the other little girl who...
  • ...
    Love the show - Daniel Mansfield
  • On target
    Everyone I have shared your editorial finds it really close...
  • Retired teacher
    Loved reading how such an outstanding citizen was able to...
  • Re: name correction
    Thank you for bringing the error to our attention, Lorianne,...
Ever Thought About Running For Office? PDF Print E-mail
Commentary/Politics - Editorials
Wednesday, 01 August 2007 03:38

Here's the thing: If good people, without personal agendas, don't run for local political offices (mayor, alderman, etc.), then Davenport will be stuck with the same unacceptable performance we are experiencing from our current mayor (Ed Winborn) and five aldermen (Jamie Howard, at large; Ian Frink, at large; Charlie Brooke, Ward 6; Barney Barnhill, Ward 7; and Brian Dumas, Ward 8), who consistently vote as a political bloc in favor of special interests, imposing legislation that often conflicts with the citizenry of taxpayers.

This reflects the poorest political conduct by elected officials because they refuse to represent the individual taxpayer in such matters. This is the same problem that plagues our state and national governance, and there is only one way to solve it: Elect trustworthy individuals who are honorable enough to stick to their campaign promises to represent the interests of the people first and foremost.

But first these noble individuals must seek office. As voters, we must agree to keep our eye on the ball by not allowing the media to distract our attention with politically irrelevant matters or negative campaigns that detract, mislead, or otherwise degrade the political process.

For example, it is appropriate to showcase facts about a candidate's voting record, or analyze leadership skills as they apply to the office sought, but personal attacks unrelated to the requirements of the job must be off-limits. If voters agree to hold the media and candidates accountable to higher standards, then honorable people will be more likely to run.

Personally, I believe elected officials should make serious money and enjoy benefits while they hold office. I am completely against any residual benefits after individuals leave office, regardless of why. Competitive compensation will automatically attract a higher caliber of participant. The business of a second-tier city can be complicated and requires individuals with problem-solving skills, some finance competencies, developed communication skills, and the ability to connect the dots, so to speak.

That is not to say that a strong measure of common sense isn't highly valued. In fact, plenty of common sense often connects dots with enormous efficiency - and honesty. If a person has the discipline to manage his own financial affairs with success, many times this logic transfers easily to the world of business, especially governmental business.

Most importantly, a willingness to learn, coupled with a commitment to making positive progress for a community's taxpayers and residents, and a questioning mind with the courage ask a lot of questions and hold out for the answers no matter what, would go a long way in today's political arena.

This country, and Davenport is no exception, is so hungry for sensible, honorable leadership. It is a perfect time for good people to enter politics and create real change. Americans want this change badly, and I believe voters are willing to deal with beginners' learning curves if it means shedding the political corruption, and the powerlessness that defines many of our citizens.

Davenport's general city election is November 6. However, the primary is October 9. Davenport chose to have primaries even though we have nonpartisan elections. In fact, if we were to eliminate primaries and opt for a Chapter 45 Ordinance, we would save an additional $32,000 every election. Without primaries, the elections in November would be like those in Bettendorf - winners take all during one election. There is no weeding of candidates via primaries, after which there are only two candidates for each seat.

Thankfully, Davenport taxpayers have enjoyed the representation of four aldermen this past term (Shawn Hamerlinck, Ward 2; Keith Meyer, Ward 3; Ray Ambrose, Ward 4; and Bill Lynn, Ward 5) who deserve consideration with continued loyalty and voter support for their consistent vigilance.

So much of the responsible city work that these four tried to accomplish was thwarted by the other council members, who could always count on Mayor Winborn to break any ties in their favor. At times, these four aldermen were forced into actions in order to block the bloc from perpetrating council actions that were premature and lacked transparency. They have continued to question and expose the bloc's activities for public scrutiny. Without their efforts, most notably those of Meyer and Hamerlinck, the public would have been politically ambushed on numerous occasions.

Rest assured that DavenportOne is working tirelessly to incorporate their hand-picked candidates into office this fall. Even with new leadership at the helm (Jim Russell, the new board chair, deserves the benefit of the doubt for now), it's hard to change one's political spots. Therefore, if Davenport wants meaningful change, taxpayers/voters must neutralize any concentrated, systematic grab for control of our city's political structure by installing honest people who will not be unduly influenced by special interests.

There is no question that it is a huge commitment of time and certain resources, and to remain steadfast in office requires good people around him or her to help balance the onslaught of special interests that invade city hall once ballots have been cast. No good candidate should have to run alone, but should be able to count on solid support throughout his/her term(s).

Anyone interested in running for a city office in Davenport for the two-year term, beginning January 2008, must pickup his or her candidacy packets at City Hall. His or her intent to run can be filed anytime between August 13 and August 30.

Comments (1)Add Comment
written by Motastic, August 01, 2007
Are you watching the same City council I am? You're choosing to support the worst of the worst!

Ray Ambrose has literally pounded his fist in the council chambers and claimed "The only job of the city is to fix pot holes and fund police and fire!" Wow - THAT philosphy is going to really move us ahead in the competitive market for economic growth. The Reader complains regularly of our struggle to grow, yet you support a man who year in and year out votes AGAINST development and creative methods of attracting new business. Just look at his voting record, it speaks for itself.

Hamerlinck is a slick talking populist, who ofeten grandstands and speaks in the 3rd person, and had showed many times his willingness to say one thing and do another. He panders to whatever audience happens to be in front of him that night. He's the perfect soundbyte, but has little to say. He's voted "NO" on about every single chance we've had to create economic growth. Case & Point - the 53rd St. development that is STILL sitting empty because he and "the 5" thought we weren't offered enough money for the land. News Flash! NO TAXES AT ALL are made if it's empty for 20 years!

Meyer rambles incoherently often for 15 mintues at a time, often losing track of his OWN POINT by the time he tries to get to it. Not to mention he often vehemently opposes his own downtown constituency which he is supposed to represent. This is highlighted by his many snide comments regarding parking and other matters, to which he then offers either absurd, or no solution to at all.

"Professor" Bill likes to tout his economics education, but when was the last time you saw this guy come up with a detailed solution for a budget? Oh wait - you haven't - because he's all talk! When put in front of a panel of local businesses some months ago, he completely froze when asked what ideas he had to help grow the economy or create an improved budget.

And perhaps most egregious of all, EVERY ONE of these guys have refused to remove VanFossen for fear of losing their own political power with the regular 5-5 ties. Putting politics over the removal of a convicted DRUNK on our city council is simply unforgivable.

For an organization who prides themselves on intelligent and responsible govenment, I'm shocked that you would throw praise in the direction of these fools. If anyone is guilty of holding back this community economically, it's the very list you've provided for us to try and keep in office!

I can only hope our voting population is smarter than you are when it comes to recognizing what's good for our community. To me, you're just preaching for change, and like these "good" council members, you are full of hot air with no real solutions to the problems you so love to identify and complain about.

Write comment
smaller | bigger