Why Illinois Republicans Want Gay Marriage to Pass PDF Print E-mail
Commentary/Politics - Illinois Politics
Written by Rich Miller   
Sunday, 27 January 2013 05:54

Off the record, most top Illinois Republicans these days will tell you that they want a state bill legalizing gay marriage passed as soon as possible.

It’s not that they’re necessarily in favor of gay marriage. Many of them are publicly and privately opposed. Some of them do support it, even though they don’t feel they can vote for it because it might destroy their careers in the next GOP primary.

The reason so many Republicans would like to see the bill passed is because they know – with the huge new Democratic majorities in both state legislative chambers – that it’s eventually going to pass anyway, and they want to get this issue out of the way and behind them as soon as possible. The issue is trending hard against the GOP’s historical opposition, and they want the thing off the table before it starts to hurt them.

Back in 2005, a statewide poll taken for the Illinois Policy Survey by Northern Illinois University found that 31 percent of Illinoisans supported gay marriage, while another 34 percent backed civil unions and 29 percent were opposed to any legal recognition. Five years later, in 2010, a poll by Southern Illinois University’s Paul Simon Public Policy Institute found little change in the public’s attitudes: 34 percent supported gay marriage, another 34 percent backed civil unions, and 27 percent said they wanted no legal recognition.

But things changed quickly. By 2012, the Paul Simon Institute’s annual poll had support for gay marriage at 44 percent – a jump of 10 big points. Opposition to all legal recognition was down to 20 percent, while backing for the civil-unions status quo was at 32 percent. A Public Policy Polling survey taken last month had support for gay marriage at 47 percent, with opposition at 42 percent. Worse yet for the Republicans, 58 percent of people under the age of 45 backed gay marriage, while 37 percent were against. And 54 percent of women backed the idea, compared to 37 percent who were opposed.

Republicans, and Democrats for that matter, expect this trend to continue. By 2014, people figure that a solid majority of Illinoisans will support gay marriage. So the Republicans don’t want to be on the wrong side of yet another hot-button issue come the next statewide election.

Republicans also want the issue cleared away because they don’t want it coming up in their primary races. Except for things such as the state income-tax hike, which was designed to be “temporary,” what’s done is usually considered done in politics.

The gay-marriage issue is causing some serious short-term divisiveness within the Republican Party ranks. Social conservatives such as freshman state Senator Jim Oberweis and former Congressman Joe Walsh have called for the head of Illinois Republican Party Chair Pat Brady because he publicly lobbied on behalf of the gay-marriage bill. The quicker this thing gets resolved, goes the reasoning, the quicker the white-hot war will end and the quicker the party can move along to other, less-divisive issues such as taxes.

The Republicans want to make repealing the state’s income-tax hike a centerpiece of the 2014 election. The tax hike is set to expire in January 2015, less than two months after the next election. But if the GOP gets too bogged down in too many social issues where it’s on the wrong side of public opinion, it won’t stand much of a chance.

Anyway, that’s why Brady was sent out to walk the plank on the gay-marriage issue earlier this month. Yes, he actually does personally support gay marriage, but he almost undoubtedly wouldn’t have gone so public with his support if party leaders were not encouraging him behind the scenes.

And the party’s top dogs, including U.S. Senator Mark Kirk and the two state GOP legislative leaders, want this thing taken care of so they can move beyond it, even though they may not actually vote for the bill when it gets to the floor. Senate GOP Leader Christine Radogno will be a "no" vote, for example, but she didn’t try to stop Brady when he checked in with her.

Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax (a daily political newsletter) and CapitolFax.com.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.