- 9.95$ Photoshop For Right-Brainers cheap oem
- Download Parallels Desktop 4 for Windows
- Download Autodesk Alias Surface 2014 MAC
- 39.95$ Best Software ACT! 2005 cheap oem
- 249.95$ Autodesk Alias Design 2012 (64-bit) cheap oem
- Buy OEM Autodesk Quantity Takeoff 2012
- Buy Altova SchemaAgent 2009 (en)
- Buy VMware Fusion 6 MAC (en)
- Buy Cheap MathWorks MatLab R2010b
- Buy Cheap DAZ Bryce 5.5
- Buy Cheap Lynda.com - Project Management Fundamentals
- Download Word 2010 For Dummies
- Buy OEM Adobe Visual Communicator 3
- Download Pinnacle Studio 16 Ultimate
|Box Office Power Rankings: 3D's Future|
|Movies - Box Office Power Rankings|
|Written by Jeff Ignatius|
|Friday, 03 April 2009 15:47|
The $59.3-million opening-weekend domestic take for Monsters Vs. Aliens is being touted as proof that 3D is a viable way to pry people off their couches and get them into the damned movie theater. Nearly 56 percent of that amount came from 3D theaters, even though 3D projection accounted for only 28 percent of the movie’s screens.
That all sounds impressive, but consider that WALL·E took in $63.1 million its first weekend, Kung Fu Panda $60.2 million, and Cars $60.1 million. Yes, those were all summer movies, but they didn’t benefit from the higher ticket prices for 3D that inflated the take of Monsters Vs. Aliens.
Monsters Vs. Aliens admittedly did well; on the strength of its box office and solid reviews, it won this past weekend’s Box Office Power Rankings — unseating I Love You, Man.
But its success doesn’t herald the dawn of a new era, no matter what 3D messiahs Jeffrey Katzenberg and James Cameron say. Their sermons amount to wishful thinking on the part of the speakers and the converted.
Here’s my argument, having seen Monster House and some IMAX movies in 3D:
About Box Office Power Rankings
Box Office Power Rankings balance box office and critical reception to create a better measure of a movie's overall performance against its peers than gross receipts alone.
The weekly rankings cover the 10 top-grossing movies in the United States for the previous weekend. I assign equal weight to box office and critical opinion, with each having two components. The measures are: box-office gross, per-theatre average, Rotten Tomatoes (RottenTomatoes.com) score, and Metacritic (Metacritic.com) score.
Why those four? Box-office gross basically measures the number of people who saw a movie in a given weekend. Per-theatre average corrects for blockbuster-wannabes that flood the market with prints, and gives limited-release movies a fighting chance. Rotten Tomatoes measures critical opinion in a binary way. And Metacritic gives a better sense of critics' enthusiasm (or bile) for a movie.
For each of the four measures, the movies are ranked and assigned points (10 for the best performer, one for the worst). Finally, those points are added up, with a maximum score of 40 and a minimum score of four.
For more Box Office Power Rankings, visit CultureSnob.net/bopr. Culture Snob is the Web site of Reader Managing Editor Jeff Ignatius.
Tags See All Tags