- Discount - Autodesk AutoCAD 2014 (32-bit)
- Buy Cheap Rosetta Stone - Learn Spanish (Latin America) (Level 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 Set) MAC
- Buy Nik Software Silver Efex Pro MAC (en)
- Buy Ashampoo Movie Shrink And Burn 3 (en)
- Download Jaksta MAC
- Buy Cheap PCTools Spyware Doctor 5.5
- Buy openPim (en)
- Discount - Cyberlink PowerDirector 7 Ultra
- Download Autodesk AutoSketch 9
- Buy Cheap Xilisoft Video To Audio Converter 5.1
- Discount - Maxon BodyPaint 3D R3
- Buy Autodesk Alias Automotive 2014 (en)
- Buy Cheap Autodesk Inventor Suite 2011
|"Love" and Other Flicks: "Love & Other Drugs," "Tangled," "Faster," and "Burlesque"|
|Movies - Reviews|
|Written by Mike Schulz|
|Sunday, 28 November 2010 17:43|
LOVE & OTHER DRUGS
In my 2009 review of the director’s turgid World War II drama Defiance, I opened by asking, “Am I the only person who wishes that Edward Zwick would go back to making sharp, bitchy comedies like his 1986 Rob Lowe-Demi Moore romance About Last Night ... ?” Well, less than two years later, Zwick has returned to those romantic-comedy roots with Love & Other Drugs. Because, apparently, I needed another reminder to be careful what I wish for.
All told, I guess this sorta-raunchy, sorta-sweet movie isn’t bad, and it certainly has more energy than the earnest, weighty, Oscar-baiting pictures that Zwick has been foisting on us of late. Set during the dawn of the late-’90s Viagra craze, Love & Other Drugs finds Jake Gyllenhaal playing a pharmaceutical sales rep who falls, quickly and deeply, for Anne Hathaway’s free spirit with the artfully shabby loft apartment, and their scenes together, especially in the introductory reels, are a blast. There are far worse ways to spend your multiplex allowance than watching two great-looking, frequently naked stars laugh and cavort and eat Chinese take-out, and for long stretches, Gyllenhaal and Hathaway are enough to make you ignore the tired sitcom plotting and obvious hard-on gags; legitimate screen chemistry is so rare these days that the stars’ loose and easy rapport is refreshing in the extreme. Yet with Hathaway’s Maggie immediately introduced as suffering from early-onset Parkinson’s disease, you spend even the film’s fast, flinty early scenes waiting for the other shoe to drop, and drop it does. In truth, a whole bunch of shoes drop, and what’s frustrating, if not infuriating, about the movie is that absolutely none of them are matching ones.
You want subplots? Man oh man does Love & Other Drugs – with its script by Zwick, Charles Randolph, and Marshall Herskovitz – provide subplots. There’s Gyllenhaal’s unapologetic lothario dealing with his fear of commitment, and Hathaway’s noble victim dealing with her fear of abandonment, and the pair dealing with their mutual fear of intimacy. There’s Oliver Platt (unusually unpleasant here) delineating the perils of corporate greed, and Hank Azaria (his charm in the service of an odious role) embodying medical-establishment impropriety, and Gabriel Macht (blandly threatening) satirizing pharmaceutical-company competition.
And in the most jarring touch of all, there’s Josh Gad as Gyllenhaal’s unmotivated, multi-millionaire, porn-addict brother, who takes residence on his sibling’s couch and jerks off to videotapes of baby bro having sex. It’s bad enough that Gad’s every revolting, credibility-straining appearance makes you want to hide under your theater seat. (Aiming for Jack Black, the actor doesn’t even qualify as sub-Dan Fogler.) But how can any movie think to offer his grotesque antics back-to-back with scenes of a tearful Maggie struggling to open a bottle of pills, or actual Parkinson’s sufferers – in the film’s most truthful, touching, and utterly shameless sequence – wittily espousing on their hardships during group therapy? With its tireless and eventually exhausting vacillation between high drama and the lowest of lowbrow humor, Love & Other Drugs wants to be a romantic comedy for the ADD generation, but it’s one that’s clearly, and sadly, off its meds.
I was among those invited by radio station 104.9 FM, Disney, and Rave Motion Pictures Davenport 53 to attend a November 20 sneak preview of the animated musical Tangled, and I’m happy to report that it totally made up for the anguish of Secretariat. Admittedly, my hopes weren’t terribly high at the outset of Disney’s latest, as this spin on the Rapunzel fairy tale opened with dispiritingly snarky, Dreamworks-y voice-over narration, some rather confusing backstory, and an introductory number that sounded like what you’d get if you took The Little Mermaid’s “Part of My World” and Beauty & the Beast’s “Belle” and kept alternating a lyric from each. (Upon the introduction of our heroine’s anthropomorphic-chameleon pet, I also worried that I’d reached my breaking point with voiceless, “funny” quadruped sidekicks.) Yet despite some forgivable cheating in the narrative – the length of Rapunzel’s cascading coiffure changes depending on the needs of the scene – and a borderline-unforgivable cheat at the movie’s finale (she’s got magical hair, fine, but when did her teardrops become magical?!), Tangled is an enormous amount of fun.
Though the colors are predictably dimmed in its 3D presentation, the imagery is still rich and vibrant; there’s a particularly stunning sequence in which hundreds of glowing paper lanterns ascend to the heavens. The encounters between the heroic thief Flynn Rider (voiced by Zachary Levi and modeled, apparently, on Adrien Brody) and the huffy steed Maximus are oftentimes laugh-out-loud hilarious, almost as funny as the slapstick involving a continually, and surprisingly, useful frying pan. (Not since Throw Momma from the Train has the kitchen utensil been employed this satisfyingly.) While the songs are nothing to write home about, lead Mandy Moore’s vocals are lovely, and a tavern-full of ruffians croon an amusing ditty that wouldn’t be out of place in Monty Python’s Spamalot. And best of all, Tangled finds Broadway legend Donna Murphy voicing Rapunzel’s stepmother, a deceptively solicitous harridan who shames her daughter into remaining locked in a tower and responds to the girl’s excitement over her new beau with a martini-dry, “Yes. A wanted criminal. I’m so proud.” Now there’s a welcome first in the Disney canon: a hateful villain whose weapon of choice is guilt.
After a too-lengthy stretch of leads in aimless family fare, culminating in January’s generically insipid Tooth Fairy, Dwayne Johnson is back in brutal, butt-kicking mode with director George Tillman Jr.’s Faster. I, for one, applaud Johnson’s return to brick-shithouse form, though I wish I didn’t feel the urge to shout the film’s title during most of its 95-minute running length. To be sure, a certain amount of padding was going to be necessary, as there’s really nothing to the movie; like a Kill Bill without the drive, danger, or humor, Faster finds an ex-con, thought to be dead, systematically offing the quintet responsible for his brother’s murder, and ... well, that’s about it. But couldn’t Tillman and screenwriters Tony and Joe Gayton have come up with more interesting diversions than the tedious B plot in which Carla Gugino’s detective and Billy Bob Thornton’s vaguely corrupt cop (slowly, slowly) tail our vengeful hero, or the bizarrely disruptive storyline in which Oliver Jackson-Cohen’s eccentric British assassin (slowly, slowly) hunts him down in between tiresome arguments with his new bride? The killings themselves are quick and fierce, and Johnson – or, rather, his stunt driver – leaves some aesthetically beautiful skid marks whenever he spins his car 180 degrees. But in general, Faster is a tedious slog, perhaps of interest only to those desperately missing Lost (Maggie Grace and Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje both appear), or those who’ve always wanted unpretentious action flicks to be more like soap operas. Johnson has a teary reunion with his mother, Thornton has a soulful late-night chat with his son, Jackson-Cohen begs Grace to marry him and raise a family, and you wind up wondering if this is the first bloody revenge melodrama to be produced by Lifetime Television.
It’s tough to determine who’ll be more disappointed by Burlesque: those hoping that the song-filled vehicle for Christina Aguilera and Cher will be a flashy, exhilarating spectacle à la Baz Luhrmann’s Moulin Rouge!, or those hoping it’ll be a flashy, embarrassing travesty à la Mariah Carey’s Glitter. Personally, I would’ve been happy with either – truly spectacular movie musicals are just as rare as actual camp classics – but writer/director Steve Antin’s feature-film debut turns out to be neither; this Iowa-bred-belter-makes-good lark is really just Hollywood’s umpteenth variant on 42nd Street with an even creakier storyline and (slightly) less clothing. There are moments, though not nearly enough of them, when the film threatens to be deliciously awful, such as when Kristin Bell’s headliner instigates an on-stage catfight during “Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend,” or when Cher, with maternal benevolence, gives Aguilera a make-over that finds her resembling a blow-up doll. There are even occasional flashes of greatness on display; Cher’s impassioned delivery of “You Haven’t Seen the Last of Me” manages to transcend the power ballad’s mediocrity, and Alan Cumming, riffing on his Broadway emcee from Cabaret, briefly suggests the insinuating, tacky good time the movie might’ve been. (His subtext seems to be, “Damn that bitch Cher for stealing my part.”) But overall, Burlesque is just bland, with Cam Gigandet as Aguilera’s dull romantic interest, Eric Dane as his even duller romantic rival, plotting that wouldn’t be out of place in a Muppet movie (the bank wants to take away Cher’s nightclub!), and lackluster choreography from the Chicago school of frenetic editing. It should be said, though, that Aguilera at least gives a pleasant, perfectly serviceable performance, even if her vocals are occasionally more ear-splitting than the Unstoppable train whizzing by on neighboring screens. And Cher and Stanley Tucci, as the diva’s de rigueur wisecracking gay assistant, prove to be a match made in snappy-banter heaven, their relaxed, seemingly improvisational joshing as enjoyable as Tucci’s and Meryl Streep’s byplay in Julie & Julia. Who else is up for a musical-comedy remake of Silkwood with Stanley Tucci in the Kurt Russell role?
Tags See All Tags