General Info
Disciplinary Spanking Gets a Bum Rap PDF Print E-mail
News Releases - General Info
Written by American College of Pediatricians   
Friday, 13 July 2012 12:28

Gainesville, Florida – July 12, 2012 - With the release of a biased report in the journal Pediatrics implying that spanking causes mental disorders, researcher Afifi continues the all-too-common unscientific assault on disciplinary spanking.

By studying the experience of "harsh physical punishment" defined as “pushed, grabbed, shoved, slapped, or hit by their parents," Afif discovered a small association (not causation) with mental disorders in adults.  The survey used to gather the data never asked about "spanking" and never limited the experience to that of a defiant child who may have received an ordinary spanking.  Yet, the researchers conclude that all physical punishment (including spanking) "should not be used with children of any age.”

Furthermore, participants in the study were most likely recalling experiences as teens, since retrospective reports correlate highest with events occurring at this age.   Adolescence is certainly not a recommended age for the use of any physical punishment.

The researchers gloss over their finding that "individuals with a family history of dysfunction were more likely to experience harsh physical punishment."  That is a better explanation for this association than the one they postulate.  It is well known that the use of harsh discipline is often a marker for trouble families and such an unhealthy environment takes its toll on a child.

So, the researchers study the inappropriate use of harsh physical punishment used at inappropriate ages within dysfunctional families, and state that all spanking should be prohibited.  The American College of Pediatricians calls upon researchers and medical publishers to stop this unwarranted assault and return to evidence-based research. Visit for details on the appropriate use of disciplinary spanking.


The American College of Pediatricians is a national medical association of licensed physicians and healthcare professionals who specialize in the care of infants, children, and adolescents. The mission of the College is to enable all children to reach their optimal physical and emotional health and well-being. For more information about the College, please visit our website

Money Saving Laundry Tips PDF Print E-mail
News Releases - General Info
Written by Ginny Grimsley   
Friday, 13 July 2012 12:14
The national crime wave that stunned the nation earlier this spring – coast-to-coast thefts of Tide laundry detergent and its use in illicit drug buys – didn’t surprise Kris Anderson.

“Laundry detergent can be expensive and it’s a product just about everyone values – even drug dealers,” says Anderson, president of Country Save Corp. (, maker of all-natural laundry and dish detergents.

“But it’s not just stores getting ripped off; it’s consumers. Anyone who buys laundry detergent and doesn’t pay close attention when they scoop it ends up using too much,” Anderson says. “Not only is it a fallacy to believe that more soap will make your clothes cleaner, it’s a huge waste of money and it’s actually bad for your clothes.”

Almost every brand of detergent has a declaration of loads per box on its packaging, he says. And for almost every brand, the number on the box does not match the scooper size provided in the box.

Anderson, whose environmentally safe Country Save laundry detergent is also distributed by the Department of Defense to all soldiers in the field, offers these facts about using your detergent prudently and economically.

• Don’t just fill up the scoop and dump it in the washer. “You definitely won’t get the maximum number of loads from the box,” Anderson says. “For instance, if you use Ultra Tide’s 40-load box and fill the scoop for every load, you’ll get just 15 scoops per box.” Instead, he says, put on your glasses, if necessary, and look at the lines on the side of the scoop. The top line, for a full load, is usually well below the lip of the scoop. Highlight the lines with a dark-colored marker to help you avoid the problem in the future. If you have soft water, using half the recommended amount is sufficient.

• Too much soap causes clothes to fade faster. Over-use of detergent is actually the leading cause of fading. Clothing may also acquire a thin, filmy layer of soap because your washer can’t thoroughly rinse the fabric. Do you tend to be itchy? It could be you’re wearing your detergent!

• Too much soap’s not good for your washing machine, either. Excess soap can gum up the works as soap deposits and lint form in your washing machine. These can contribute to mold – and its accompanying stench; they can plug up filters and other openings; and they can lead to mechanical breakdowns. In some machines, you may also end up wasting (and spending more for) water as the machine spins into extended cycles in an effort to remove the soap.

• Run a test load to see if you’re over-soaping. Run a load with clothes only – no detergent. Do you see suds? That’s an indication of how much detergent you are wearing.

• Reduce pollutants by using an all-natural detergent. While Country Save had the first phosphate-free detergent on the market back in 1977, many companies have now removed the additive because of its harmful effects on rivers, lakes and other fresh water. However, most companies continue to use other additives, such as optic brighteners, fragrances and dyes, Anderson says. “The more often consumers choose the most natural products, the better off our environment will be – even if some people still use too much!

About Country Save Detergent

Country Save became the nation’s first phosphate-free detergent when Elmer Pearson – creator of Elmer’s Glue -- introduced it in 1977. A chemist and environmentalist, he developed Country Save products without animal testing or animal byproducts. They’re designed to be environmentally safe and they’re recommended for people with sensitive skin. The line also includes dish detergent and oxygen-powered powdered bleach. Find Country Save products on the company’s website and

offshore tax transactions, Grassley clip out of context PDF Print E-mail
News Releases - General Info
Written by Grassley Press   
Thursday, 12 July 2012 13:53
Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa is receiving media questions about a new video from President Obama’s campaign that includes a Grassley clip.  The following is a statement from a Grassley spokeswoman:

“The video clip lacks any context and is blatantly misleading.  In the clip, Sen. Grassley is talking about tax policy for tax-exempt organizations.  The ad is talking about tax policy for other kinds of taxpayers.

“The Grassley clip comes from a March 2010 nomination hearing in the Finance Committee.  In his comments and questions, Sen. Grassley was revealing that President Obama’s nominee for Treasury Under Secretary of Domestic Finance – Jeffrey Goldstein – was a partner in a firm that engineered offshore accounts for tax-exempt organizations/businesses to avoid Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT), even while President Obama had attacked offshore vehicles for avoiding taxes.”


The hearing record is available here.  Sen. Grassley’s back-and-forth with Jeffrey Goldstein is on pages 13-16 and pages 75-81.

Sen. Grassley’s oversight of UBIT goes back to his reviews of tax-exempt hospitals and other nonprofit oversight.  A Finance Committee hearing in 2007 highlighted how charities avoid taxes with offshore funds.  This testimony led to Sen. Grassley’s oversight of tax-exempt university endowments.  UBIT is designed for tax-exempts that engage in commercial activity.  Boys and Girls Club is a good example, as it’s used offshore tax havens to shield otherwise taxable income from taxation.  Boys and Girls Club is not only tax-exempt but also receives taxpayer funded federal grants.

In August 2011, Sen. Grassley wrote to President Obama asking for his definition of tax loophole (below).  The Treasury Department responded, saying it agreed with Sen. Grassley that tax loopholes are unintentional benefits derived by taxpayers who may have found a way to game the system.

For Immediate Release
Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2011

Grassley Urges Attention to Charitable Loophole Subsidized by Taxpayers

WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa today urged the Administration and congressional colleagues to take action to limit or close a charitable loophole that taxpayers heavily subsidize yet results in financial gains for a few principals and very little money for charities. At a Finance Committee hearing today, Grassley gave the example of the George Kaiser Family Foundation, which is in the news as a key investor in the now-bankrupt Solyndra solar energy company.

Grassley said the George Kaiser Family Foundation converted from a private foundation to a supporting organization about ten years ago, as reported by The New York Times in 2005.  He said if the organization had remained a private foundation, it likely would not have been able to invest as much as it did in Solyndra or the other private equity or hedge funds in which it invested.  It also would have been subject to strong restrictions on self-dealing and excise taxes on its investment income.  The donors who contributed $1 billion in cash and securities, including non-publicly traded securities, over the past three years would have been subject to lower limits for deductibility if it had remained a private foundation.

“So, with Solyndra, the government didn’t just lose out on its investment through the $535 million loan guarantee,” Grassley told the Finance Committee. “It also lost out on the tremendous subsidy it provided the George Kaiser Family Foundation through the charitable contribution deduction.”

Grassley urged the Finance Committee leaders, as they schedule tax reform hearings, to schedule a hearing “to examine the standards for tax exemption and the increasingly blurred line between public charities and private foundations.”  Grassley also wrote to the Treasury secretary and the IRS commissioner, citing the George Kaiser Family Foundation example and urging them to finish a long-overdue study on appropriate pay-out rates for supporting organizations.

Grassley wrote in his letter, “The study was intended to inform the Treasury as to what was an appropriate pay-out level.  The idea was that the pay-out requirement should be no less than what is required of private foundations since these supporting organizations were clearly formed to skirt the private foundation rules.  If the Administration is serious about closing loopholes, it should prioritize the completion of the study and the finalization of the pay-out rules for those supporting organizations Congress deemed to be exploiting the tax code.  Both of these will be helpful as Congress continues to consider tax reform.”

Grassley is a senior member and former chairman and ranking member of the Finance Committee, with exclusive Senate jurisdiction over tax policy.
Grassley’s statement at the Finance Committee today is available here.

Grassley’s new letter to the Treasury and IRS is available here.

Grassley’s staff analysis of the George Kaiser Family Foundation is available here.

Grassley’s Aug. 11, 2011, letter to President Obama on the definition of tax loopholes is available here.

Treasury’s Oct. 3, 2011, response is available here.
The Grassley-Baucus 2005 letter to Treasury regarding supporting organizations and a related press release are available here.



Treasury nominees on hold over IRS whistleblower office PDF Print E-mail
News Releases - General Info
Written by Grassley Press   
Thursday, 12 July 2012 13:35

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Grassley Objects to Two Treasury Nominees over IRS Whistleblower Office Concerns

WASHINGTON – As promised, Sen. Chuck Grassley is formally objecting to Senate consideration of two Treasury nominees until the Treasury and IRS provide responses to his latest letter on the IRS whistleblower office.  The nominees are Mark J. Mazur, to be an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and Matthew S. Rutherford to be an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.

“The IRS could and should be doing a lot more to stop big-dollar tax cheats,” Grassley said.  “Progress on the whistleblower office is critical for tax compliance.”

Grassley wrote to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman on June 21, the latest in a series of letters to explore the reasons for slow-going on whistleblower case processing and pay-outs.  While Treasury and IRS have provided information in meetings among staff, Grassley intends to object to Senate consideration of the nominees until he receives written responses to his June 21 letter.

Grassley’s notice of intention to object from the Congressional Record follows here.  The text of his June 21 letter is available here.  A press release describing Grassley’s history on the issue is available here.

INTENTION TO OBJECT -- (Senate - June 27, 2012)

[Page: S4668]

Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, I intend to object to proceeding to the nominations of Mark J. Mazur, to be an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury and Matthew S. Rutherford to be an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.

My support for the final confirmation of these nominees will depend on both Treasury and Internal Revenue Service responses to questions I have posed regarding their implementation of the tax whistleblower program. I rewrote the statute in 2006 to encourage whistleblowing on big-dollar tax cheats. However, nearly six years since those changes were enacted, Treasury has yet to issue much needed regulations and IRS has paid less than a half dozen awards under the new program.

I have sent several letters to Secretary Geithner and Commissioner Shulman to get to the bottom of this. Our staffs have been meeting, including most recently on June 26, 2012. I understand that Secretary Geithner and Commissioner Shulman intend to provide written responses to my questions. Until I receive those responses, I will object to proceeding with the nominations of Mr. Rutherford and Dr. Mazur.


News Releases - General Info
Written by The United West   
Wednesday, 11 July 2012 14:00
Gen. Jerry Boykin
"The Ties That Bind"
LTG Jerry Boykin (ret.)
Do not miss General Boykin detail the importance of our relationship with Israel in these dangerous days!
  • 36 years in the Army
  • Original member of the US Army's Delta Force.
  • Commanded all the Army's Green Berets
  • Special Warfare Center and School
  • Served a tour with the CIA
  • Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
  • Grenada, Somalia, and Iraq
  • Teaches at Hampden-Sydney College (Virginia).
  • Black Hawk Down in 1993
  • Books include Never Surrender:
A Soldier's Journey to the Crossroads of Faith and Freedom
  • Team leader for Team BII Report, Shariah - The Threat to America
  • Expert on defense policy, terrorism and the US-Israel relationship.
Ahavath Torah Congregation
Stoughton, MA 02072
The United West
WEDNESDAY JULY 11, 7pm (edt)
Please donate $25.00 to help us continue


<< Start < Prev 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 Next > End >>

Page 248 of 406