- Discount - Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4 MAC
- Buy Sony Vegas Pro 8 (en)
- Buy Cheap Adobe InCopy CC MAC (Full LifeTime License)
- 79.95$ Atomix VirtualDJ Pro 6 MAC cheap oem
- Buy Autodesk Maya 2013 (32-bit) (en,ja)
- Buy OEM Corel VideoStudio Pro X6
- Discount - Acronis True Image Home 2010
- Buy Cheap Autodesk 3ds Max 2011
- Buy OEM Microsoft Project Standard 2013
- 29.95$ Infinite Skills - Learning Revit Structure 2014 cheap oem
- Download Adobe Captivate CC
|Grassley Amendments to Senate Farm Bill Focus on EPA, Payment Limits, Competition|
|News Releases - Agribusiness|
|Written by Grassley Press|
|Wednesday, 22 May 2013 14:05|
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
WASHINGTON – Senator Chuck Grassley has introduced three amendments to the farm and nutrition bill being debated before the Senate. Grassley is one of two working family farmers in the United States Senate and a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee.
Nearly 80 percent of the funding for the farm bill is geared toward nutrition programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps), the Emergency Food Assistance Program, and various food assistance programs for seniors and children. Only 20 percent of the funding for the farm bill is directed toward agriculture programs.
“The small amount of the farm bill that is geared toward agriculture is an opportunity to give farmers the certainty they deserve and to make changes to the farm programs that provide a marketplace where agriculture can thrive and feed and fuel the world,” Grassley said. “These are common-sense amendments that would hold the bureaucracy accountable, keep fairness in farm program payments, and ensure the Department of Agriculture, with its extraordinary knowledge and expertise in agricultural matters, has a more formal role with the Justice Department in scrutinizing ag competition.”
Grassley’s first amendment would protect livestock and poultry farmers from having their personal information released by the EPA. It does not prevent the EPA from collecting the information about where farmers’ operations are located. It also does not prevent EPA from disclosing information in the aggregate. Grassley’s amendment stems from the EPA’s release of the personal information of over 80,000 livestock and poultry owners from across the nation to three activist groups. A large portion of the data disclosed to the activist groups did not meet the definition of a Consolidated Animal Feeding Operation. In fact, in the data collected on farmers from Iowa, the EPA disclosed information on people who owned as few as one pig, and another individual who owned 12 horses.
Grassley’s second amendment would hold peanut farmers to the same cumulative $50,000 payment limit that applies to farmers growing other crops. In current law, and in the underlying bill, peanut farmers essentially can double their farm payments if they grow peanuts and another type of crop.
Grassley’s third amendment would create a Special Counsel at the Department of Agriculture. The Special Counsel would be charged with analyzing mergers within the food and agricultural sectors, in consultation with the Chief Economist of the Department of Agriculture, the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, and the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission. In addition the Special Counsel would investigate and prosecute violations of the Packers and Stockyards Act.-30-
Tags See All Tags