- Buy Lynda.com - Digital Photography Principles: The Camera (en)
- Buy Adobe Dreamweaver CS5.5 (cs,pl,tr,de,es,it,pt,fr,nl,sv,en)
- Buy Cheap I.R.I.S. Readiris 11 Pro
- Buy Infinite Skills - Interactivity with HTML5 And CreateJS MAC (en)
- Buy OEM Autodesk Mudbox 2014 (64-bit)
- Buy Corel Painter X MAC (en)
- Discount - Parallels Desktop 4 MAC
- Buy Cheap Adobe ColdFusion Builder 2
- Buy OEM Adobe Captivate 4
- Discount - Adobe Photoshop CC Student And Teacher Edition (Full LifeTime license)
- Discount - Steinberg Halion 3
- Buy Cheap proDAD Mercalli 3 SAL (32-bit)
- Buy Cheap Steinberg Cubase SX3
- 99.95$ Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended Student And Teacher Edition cheap oem
|Grassley Bill to Require Televising Supreme Court Proceedings Clears Committee|
|News Releases - General Info|
|Written by Grassley Press|
|Friday, 10 February 2012 09:00|
Thursday, February 9, 2012
WASHINGTON – Legislation written by Senators Chuck Grassley, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Dick Durbin, Judiciary Committee member, to require open proceedings of the Supreme Court to be televised passed the Senate Judiciary Committee today by a vote of 11-7.
The Cameras in the Courtroom Act would require television coverage of all open sessions of the Court, unless the Court decides, by a vote of the majority of justices, that doing so would constitute a violation of the due process rights of one or more of the parties before the Court. A similar bill was approved by a bipartisan majority of the Judiciary Committee last Congress.
“Our Constitution requires that the government be accountable to the people. The best way we can ensure that the federal government is accountable is to create transparency, openness, and access. That’s why the Cameras in the Courtroom bill is necessary. It would permit all Americans, not just the 200 people who can fit inside the public gallery, the opportunity to observe what is already a public proceeding,” Grassley said. “This is a tremendous opportunity which would help increase understanding of, and appreciation for, the highest court in the land.”
Last year, Grassley asked Chief Justice John Roberts to provide audio and video coverage of the landmark Supreme Court proceedings of the federal health care reform law. Grassley said that broadcasting the health care reform law proceedings would not only contribute to the public’s understanding of America’s judicial system, but provide an excellent educational opportunity on a case that has the potential to have a far reaching impact on every American. Grassley has not yet received a response to his letter from the Chief Justice.
"Nine Justices have a tremendous amount of influence on the lives of the people of this country, yet people know very little about the highest court in our country. In just a month or so the Supreme Court will hear arguments about a law that has the potential to impact every American. Allowing cameras in the Supreme Court will help bring much needed transparency to a process that is largely unknown to the American public," Grassley said.
The Cameras in the Courtroom Act only applies to open sessions of the Supreme Court – sessions where members of the public are already invited to observe in person. Public scrutiny of Supreme Court proceedings will produce greater accountability, transparency, and understanding of our judicial system.
Grassley is also the author of bipartisan legislation that would allow the chief judge of federal trial and appellate courts to permit cameras in their courtrooms. The bill directs the Judicial Conference, the principal policy-making entity for the federal courts, to draft nonbinding guidelines that judges can refer to in making a decision pertaining to the coverage of a particular case. In addition, it instructs the Judicial Conference to issue mandatory guidelines for obscuring vulnerable witnesses such as undercover officers, victims of crime, and their families. The bill has safeguards in place to protect vulnerable witnesses, to exclude jurors from broadcast, and to allow a judge to use his or her discretion in determining whether to allow cameras in the courtroom.
Tags See All Tags