- Discount - Alien Skin Snap Art 3
- Buy Autodesk NavisWorks Simulate 2009 (en)
- Discount - Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise R2 SP2 (32 bit)
- Buy Cheap Lynda.com - CSS: Page Layouts
- Download Autodesk Alias Surface 2014 (64-bit)
- 89.95$ Nikon Capture NX 2.4.5 MAC cheap oem
- Download Autodesk AutoCAD Design Suite Premium 2014 (32-bit)
- Download Autodesk AutoCAD Structural Detailing 2012 (32-bit)
- Buy Adobe RoboHelp 9 (en,fr,de,ja)
- Buy Adobe Fireworks CS6 (en,ja,de,es,fr,pt,sv,nl,it,ko,pl,tr,cs)
- Buy Cheap Avid Media Composer 6 MAC (64 bit)
- Buy OEM Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended
|Grassley says the denial of Iowa’s request for an education waiver is baseless|
|News Releases - Education & Schools|
|Written by Grassley Press|
|Monday, 02 July 2012 09:58|
June 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Senator Chuck Grassley is challenging the U.S. Secretary of Education over his agency’s overreach in denying Iowa’s request for a waiver from some requirements in the No Child Left Behind Act, saying the Obama administration’s rationale lacks “democratic legitimacy.”
Grassley said the federal law contains no requirement for states to develop a “teacher and leader evaluation and support system,” which was the reason given by the U.S. Department of Education in denying Iowa’s request. Grassley said the state-level issue of whether the Iowa Department of Education has the authority to implement such a system is irrelevant in this waiver request because the federal government doesn’t have the power to require it.
“If we have learned any lesson from the No Child Left Behind Act, it is that, in our vast and diverse nation, one size does not fit all,” Grassley said in the letter he sent today to Secretary Arne Duncan. “Therefore, I ask that you invite states to submit waiver requests that are entirely locally designed and that you establish an objective process to review such waiver requests that evaluates them on their merits, free from any specific federal policy agenda that has not been enacted by Congress.”
Grassley said the matter of what specific education reforms are right for Iowa is between the Governor, the Iowa Legislature, and the people, not the federal education agency.
The text of Grassley’s letter to Duncan is below. Click here to see a signed copy of the letter.
June 29, 2012
The Honorable Arne Duncan
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20202
Dear Secretary Duncan,
The recent letter to the Director of the Iowa Department of Education signed by your Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education denying the State of Iowa’s request for a waiver from certain federal requirements raises some serious concerns. This letter makes clear that the denial is based on the fact that the Iowa Department of Education does not have the authority to implement a “teacher and leader evaluation and support system” that contains six specific components. Section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act provides that states or school districts can apply to waive certain requirements of that law and sets out the required components for such a waiver request. Nowhere in this section, or anywhere else in federal law, is there a requirement for states to develop a “teacher and leader evaluation and support system” and nowhere in the law is the Secretary of Education granted the authority to require the implementation of new policies that are not in existing law.
As you know, the Iowa Department of Education lacks the authority to implement such a system because the Iowa Legislature considered the matter and declined to grant that authority. As a federal elected official, it is not my place to say whether or not that was the right decision. I admire Governor Branstad’s commitment to education reform, but the details of what specific reforms are right for Iowa is a matter between the Governor of Iowa, the Iowa Legislature, and the people of Iowa. It is certainly not the place of the U.S. Secretary of Education to condition relief of certain federal requirements on the adoption of a whole new federal policy agenda that has never passed Congress and therefore lacks democratic legitimacy.
It is important to recognize that real innovation and reform cannot be imposed from the top down, but must come from the ground up. What works in one state or community may not work in another. If we have learned any lesson from the No Child Left Behind Act, it is that, in our vast and diverse nation, one size does not fit all. Therefore, I ask that you invite states to submit waiver requests that are entirely locally designed and that you establish an objective process to review such waiver requests that evaluates them on their merits, free from any specific federal policy agenda that has not been enacted by Congress.
Charles E. GrassleyUnited States Senator
Tags See All Tags