- Discount - Intuit Quicken Home & Business 2011
- Buy Pantaray Q-Setup Pro 9 (en)
- 99.95$ Microsoft Windows 8 (32 bit) cheap oem
- Buy Autodesk AutoCAD MEP 2014 (64-bit) (de,en,fr,it,ko)
- 249.95$ Autodesk Algor Simulation Professional 2011 cheap oem
- Buy OEM Adobe InCopy CC (Full LifeTime License)
- 259.95$ Autodesk Autocad Electrical 2009 cheap oem
- Download Infinite Skills - Learning OS X Mountain Lion Server MAC
- Discount - Access 2010: The Missing Manual
- Buy Cheap Lynda.com - Up and Running with PHP: PEAR, PECL, and Composer
- Buy Steinberg Cubase 5 (en)
- Discount - Adobe InDesign CC (Full LifeTime License)
|Humane Cosmetics Act Highlights the Cost of Beauty – Paid By Animals|
|News Releases - General Info|
|Written by Ginny Grimsley|
|Monday, 28 July 2014 13:16|
4 Unnecessary Tests that Harm or Kill Animals
More and more, we are living in an age of information, the substance of which is increasingly difficult to ignore, says animal rights advocate Santosh Krinsky.
Are our coffee and chocolate products fair trade? Were poor workers in developing countries brutalized in the process of making our clothes? How was the food sourced in the groceries we buy, and what exactly is in it, anyway?
Increasingly, the answers to these questions matter to more consumers, Krinsky says.
In the same vein, Rep. Jim Moran is sponsoring the Humane Cosmetics Act, which would phase out animal testing for U.S.-made cosmetics within a year and imported cosmetics within three years.
“Consumers value cosmetics and manufacturers want them to be safe for daily use, but we do not have to blind, maim and kill scores of animals to ensure our beauty-enhancing products won’t hurt us,” says Krinsky, head of the international personal-care brand Beauty Without Cruelty (www.beautywithoutcruelty.com) -- the first to ban animal-testing for its products in 1963. BWC’s products are all produced with no animal testing and contain no animal ingredients.
“In the past, testing was done on dogs, but now it’s done on rabbits, guinea pigs, mice and rats. These are conscious creatures with the capacity for immense suffering. Think about it: Tests are done on these animals because they are biologically similar to us. Doesn’t that also mean we should be especially empathetic to their suffering?”
Krinsky, who recently partnered with the Humane Society of the United States’ “Be Cruelty-Free” campaign, urges voters to call their U.S. representative and ask for him or her to vote in favor of H.R. 4148. Follow up with a personalized mail or email asking reiterating your request.
He reviews some of the tests that mainstream cosmetic companies still commonly conduct on animals.
“The European Union has already banned cosmetics that use these practices, and I think Rep. Moran’s efforts are a sign of things to come here in the U.S.,” Krinsky says. “In fact, many consumers prefer lipstick, mascara, shampoo, lotion and other products consisting of material that’s so safe that they don’t require animal testing.”
About Santosh Krinsky
Santosh Krinsky has been in the natural products industry since 1974. He has founded and built a number of companies that offer positive alternatives to the toxins and environmentally unfriendly ingredients found in many products, while focusing his attention on developing awareness about the issue of animal testing of cosmetics, which he opposes. Beauty Without Cruelty (BWC) products brand www.beautywithoutcruelty.com was founded in England in 1963 by BWC Charitable Trust, an animal welfare organization. Lotus Brands obtained the American rights to the BWC brand in 2010. BWC Features a complete line of hair, skin and facial/body care products and an extensive range of color cosmetics.
Tags See All Tags