• Download MAMP Pro 3 MAC
  • Discount - Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate with SP2 (64bit)
  • 19.95$ ABest RM RMVB Video Converter cheap oem
  • 159.95$ Autodesk AutoCAD LT 2009 (32-bit) cheap oem
  • Download Adobe Creative Suite 5.5 Master Collection
  • Discount - Adobe Creative Suite 5.5 Master Collection MAC
  • Buy Cheap ABest Video to WMV MOV Converter
  • 99.95$ Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 MAC cheap oem
  • Buy Alien Skin Eye Candy 7 MAC (en)
  • 59.95$ Roxio Toast 10 Titanium MAC cheap oem
  • Buy OEM Microsoft Visio Standard 2013
  • Kohl and Grassley Urge Super Committee to Save Billions by Encouraging Competition from Generic Drugs PDF Print E-mail
    News Releases - Health, Medicine & Nutrition
    Written by Grassley Press   
    Monday, 17 October 2011 12:12

    WASHINGTON – As the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction works to adopt deficit reduction measures, Senators Herb Kohl and Chuck Grassley are urging the panel to include a bipartisan bill that cuts costs by encouraging competition from generic drugs.

    The Preserve Access to Affordable Generic Drugs Act (S. 27) would deter “pay-for delay” settlements in which brand name drug companies settle patent disputes by paying generic drug manufacturers in exchange for the promise of keeping the generic version of the drug off the market. Under the bill, these anti-consumer pay-off agreements would be presumed illegal and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would be given the authority to stop the agreements.

    “Keeping generic drugs out of the market costs taxpayers and consumers billions of dollars,” Kohl said. “By ending these kinds of backroom deals, generic drugs will get to market sooner and prescription drug costs will go down.”

    “The wheeling and dealing that these companies take part in only hurts the pocketbooks of taxpayers.  Our bill is a win-win for both the federal government and the consumer.  It won’t solve our fiscal problems, but every little bit helps,” Grassley said.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill would save the federal government – which pays approximately one-third of all prescription costs – $2.68 billion over ten years. The president included a provision to end pay-for-delay settlements in his FY 2012 budget and estimated it would save the federal government $8 billion over ten years. The FTC estimated that ending these settlements would save consumers, who pay for prescription drugs through private insurance or on their own, $3.5 billion per year.

    The text of the letter is included below and a copy of the letter can be found here.

    October 13, 2011

     

    The Honorable Patty Murray

    Co-Chairman

    Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction

    United States Congress

    Washington, DC 20510

     

    The Honorable Jeb Hensarling

    Co-Chairman

    Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction

    United States Congress

    Washington, DC 20510

     

    Dear Senator Murray and Representative Hensarling:

    As the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction considers measures to accomplish deficit reduction, we urge you to include our bipartisan  pro-consumer legislation to remove barriers to generic drug competition, the Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act, S. 27.  Because it would increase the availability of low cost generic drugs to millions of Americans, this legislation has been scored by the Congressional Budget Office as saving the federal government over $ 2.68 billion in reduced drug reimbursement payment in federal health programs over the next decade.    The President’s budget for FY 2012 estimated that adoption of our bill would save the federal government $ 8.79 billion over the next decade.

    Our bill would presume illegal so-called “pay for delay” pharmaceutical patent settlements.   In these settlements, brand name pharmaceutical companies pay millions of dollars in cash or other valuable consideration to generic drug companies to settle drug patent litigation, in return for the generic drug company agreeing to withhold marketing its generic drug until the end, or shortly before, the expiration of the patent.

    These pay for delay settlements deprive consumers of years of generic drug competition, while enriching both the generic drug company and the brand name manufacturer, which maintains its monopoly on the drug.   However, consumers lose by paying substantially higher prices and the government loses by paying substantially higher drug reimbursement payments under Medicare and other federal health programs.

    In the late 1990s, the FTC challenged several pay-for-delay agreements as being anti-competitive and shortly thereafter, the use of these agreements declined.  From 2000 to 2004, patent cases continued to settle, but the settlements did not include payments to generic drug makers.  Since 2005, however, three Circuit Courts of Appeal decisions have rejected these antitrust challenges, and held that the rights of patent holders make virtually any patent settlement permissible, even anti-competitive settlements, trumping antitrust law.  And the effects of these court decisions were immediate - the FTC found that half of the settlements made in 2006 and 2007 between brand name and generic companies included a pay-off from the brand name manufacturer in exchange for a promise from the generic company to delay entry into the market.  These precedents have made it very difficult for the FTC to successfully challenge these pay-for-delay patent settlements.  Our legislation would ensure that these anticompetitive pay-for-delay agreements are properly subject to antitrust scrutiny.

    The Preserve Affordable Access to Generics Act is a balanced solution to addressing this problem.  Under our legislation, these pay-for-delay agreements will be presumed illegal and the FTC will have to pursue legal action under the FTC Act to invalidate a settlement.  During the proceeding, the drug companies will have the opportunity to prove to a judge by clear and convincing evidence that these agreements are pro-competitive.  Significant penalties may be assessed against companies that enter into agreements which are found to be illegal.  This legislation will therefore prevent anti-competitive pay-for-delay agreements while permitting settlements which truly do not harm competition.

    In addition, we should stress that our bill would in no way prevent pharmaceutical patent settlements that do not contain pay for delay provisions.   In FY 2010, the FTC reviewed 113 settlements agreements under the Medicare Modernization Act.  Of those, 31 contained pay-for-delay provisions, of which 22 involved different drugs for a total of $9.3 billion in U.S. sales.  The 81 remaining settlements did not have a pay-for-delay provision in them.  This data suggests that these cases can be settled without resorting to a pay-for delay agreement.   Our legislation only targets those settlements that harm competition – pay-for-delay agreements in which cash or other valuable consideration is exchanged for delay in generic entry.

     

    Our legislation passed the Senate Judiciary Committee with bipartisan support in both of the last two Congresses, most recently in July.   By removing a significant barrier to the availability of generic drugs, this bill will reduce the federal deficit and benefit millions of consumers. We urge the Joint Select Committee to include our bill as part of any overall deficit reduction measure that you adopt.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Sincerely,

     

     

    _____________________________ 

    HERB KOHL                           CHUCK GRASSLEY                      

    Chairman, Subcommittee on                   Ranking Member, Committee on the

    Antitrust,  Competition Policy                    Judiciary

    and Consumer Rights

     

     

    CC:

    Senator Max Baucus

    Senator John Kerry

    Senator Jon Kyl

    Senator Rob Portman

    Senator Pat Toomey

    Congressman Xavier Becerra

    Congressman Dave Camp

    Congressman James Clyburn

    Congressman Fred Upton

    Congressman Chris Van Hollen
    blog comments powered by Disqus

    Trackback(0)
    Comments (0)Add Comment

    Write comment
    You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

    busy