- 9.95$ iA Writer MAC cheap oem
- Discount - ABest Video to AVI MOV Converter
- Discount - Autodesk AutoCAD Map 3D 2009
- Buy Cheap Adobe RoboHelp Server 9 (32-bit)
- 39.95$ Corel Motion Studio 3D cheap oem
- Buy Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Premium MAC
- Discount - Mac OS X Lion: The Missing Manual
- Buy Cheap Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 (32-bit)
- Download QuarkXPress 10 MAC
- Download Adobe Dreamweaver CS5.5 Student And Teacher Edition
- 289.95$ Autodesk Alias Design 2014 (64-bit) cheap oem
- Buy Adobe Illustrator CS5 Classroom in a Book (en)
|Narcisse vs Iowa Secretary of State|
|News Releases - Politics & Elections|
|Written by Paul Smith|
|Wednesday, 02 April 2014 08:51|
by Alfredo Parrish
Having been nurtured by some of our country’s greatest advocates of voter enfranchisement, I am deeply disappointed with the two recent rulings of the district and Iowa Supreme Court denying Mr. Narcisse an opportunity to appear as a candidate for Governor in the Democratic Primary. Iowa’s history of enfranchisement is a cornerstone of its uniqueness. Rules and procedures that are not equally applied to all candidates seeking office diminish the process. It creates cynicism that will weaken a vibrant democratic process.
Although, the judicial system denied Mr. Narcisse a place on the Democratic Primary ballot, it is encouraging that recognition was given to the importance of his claim by considering and deciding his case promptly.
Mr. Narcisse, in his law suit asked to court to consider a fair and impartial review of a candidate’s nomination papers, an equitable rule for all candidates and distinguishing technical violations from substantive ones. Mr. Narcisse’s law suit pointed to clear deficiencies in the nomination process that will lay the groundwork for needed improvements.
Tags See All Tags