- 89.95$ Rosetta Stone - Learn Korean (Level 1, 2 & 3 Set) cheap oem
- Buy Cheap Lynda.com - AutoCAD 2013 Essentials: 02 Drawing Fundamentals
- Buy OEM Dreamweaver CS4 All-in-One For Dummies
- 9.95$ Lynda.com - InDesign CS6 New Features cheap oem
- Buy OEM Lynda.com - Create a Sortable Photo Gallery with jQuery
- Buy Apple Aperture 3 MAC (en,kr,ja,fr,de,es,it,pt,nl,ru)
- Download Microsoft Office Visio Professional 2007 SP2
- 199.95$ Autodesk Infrastructure Map Server 2012 cheap oem
- Discount - Xilisoft Video Converter Ultimate 5.1
- Buy OEM Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium MAC
- Buy Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection Student and Teacher Edition MAC
- Buy Apple Mac Box Set (en)
|Narcisse vs Iowa Secretary of State|
|News Releases - Politics & Elections|
|Written by Paul Smith|
|Wednesday, 02 April 2014 08:51|
by Alfredo Parrish
Having been nurtured by some of our country’s greatest advocates of voter enfranchisement, I am deeply disappointed with the two recent rulings of the district and Iowa Supreme Court denying Mr. Narcisse an opportunity to appear as a candidate for Governor in the Democratic Primary. Iowa’s history of enfranchisement is a cornerstone of its uniqueness. Rules and procedures that are not equally applied to all candidates seeking office diminish the process. It creates cynicism that will weaken a vibrant democratic process.
Although, the judicial system denied Mr. Narcisse a place on the Democratic Primary ballot, it is encouraging that recognition was given to the importance of his claim by considering and deciding his case promptly.
Mr. Narcisse, in his law suit asked to court to consider a fair and impartial review of a candidate’s nomination papers, an equitable rule for all candidates and distinguishing technical violations from substantive ones. Mr. Narcisse’s law suit pointed to clear deficiencies in the nomination process that will lay the groundwork for needed improvements.
Tags See All Tags