- Download LATENITESOFT Xslimmer MAC
- Buy OEM Autodesk 3ds Max Design 2014 (64-bit)
- Buy OEM Prosoft Data Rescue 3 MAC
- Download Nik Software Color Efex Pro 4 Complete Edition MAC
- Buy Cheap Sony ACID Pro 6
- 89.95$ Adobe Acrobat X Pro Student And Teacher Edition MAC cheap oem
- Discount - Rosetta Stone - Learn Irish (Level 1) MAC
- 149.95$ CorelDRAW Graphics Suite X6 (64-bit) cheap oem
- Buy OEM Autodesk AutoCAD LT 2014 (32-bit)
- Download Lynda.com - Running a Design Business: Designer-Client Agreements
- 249.95$ Autodesk Smoke 2012 MAC cheap oem
- 9.95$ Lynda.com - Foundations of Photography: Night and Low Light cheap oem
|Possible Anticompetitive Practices by Oil Companies that Hurt Consumers, Klobuchar, Grassley call for Investigation|
|News Releases - Business & Economy|
|Written by Grassley Press|
|Wednesday, 21 August 2013 12:03|
Klobuchar, Grassley Call on Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission to Investigate Allegations of Possible Anticompetitive Practices by Oil Companies that Hurt Consumers
Recent concerns indicate that oil companies may be taking steps to undermine efforts to distribute renewable fuels, including higher level ethanol blends, that help boost energy security and lower the price of gas for consumers
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D, MN) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) called on the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate possible anticompetitive practices by oil companies that limit consumers access to homegrown renewable fuels. In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder and FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez, Klobuchar, the chair of the Antitrust Subcommittee, and Grassley, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, urged the Administration to take action to address recent reports indicating that oil companies may be undermining efforts to distribute renewable fuels, including higher ethanol gasoline blends, that help boost our nation’s energy security and lower the price of gas for consumers.
“The promise of renewable fuels is rapidly becoming a reality and introducing much needed competition to the transportation fuels sector,” the members said. “Given the implication these alleged activities, if true, could have on competition in the marketplace, we urge you to investigate them and consider whether any action is necessary. We look forward to working with you to ensure that Americans can continue to realize the benefits of cheaper, cleaner renewable fuel.”
The Honorable Eric Holder
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530
The Honorable Edith Ramirez
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
Dear Attorney General Holder and Chairwoman Ramirez:
We are writing to express concerns that oil companies are engaging in anticompetitive practices aimed at blocking market access for renewable fuels. We urge you to investigate these allegations and, if true, whether they violate the nation’s antitrust laws.
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA) created the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) to promote the development and use of domestic renewable fuel. Since its inception, the RFS has helped to decrease oil imports and increase our energy security while reducing the price of gasoline for American consumers. Faced with growing competition from new sources of fuel promoted by the RFS, the oil industry has publicly stated their goal of repealing the RFS. At the same time, we have heard reports that oil companies are taking steps to undermine efforts to distribute renewable fuels that could help to meet the RFS requirement.
We have heard allegations that the oil industry is mandating retailers to carry and sell premium gasoline, thereby blocking the use of the current retail infrastructure to sell renewable fuels. Station owners who wish to sell renewable fuel would bear the cost and logistical burden of having to install additional infrastructure to do so. In one case, an oil company is alleged to be using its franchise agreements to preclude franchisees from offering higher level ethanol blends to their customers. By forcing a franchisee to carry premium gasoline as a condition of carrying regular gas, the oil company may be using its economic power over its franchisee to effect a tying arrangement in violation of the Sherman Act. This conduct may also violate the Gasohol Competition Act of 1980, which prohibits discrimination or unreasonable limits against the sale of gasohol or other synthetic motor fuels.
The promise of renewable fuels is rapidly becoming a reality and introducing much needed competition to the transportation fuels sector. Given the implication these alleged activities, if true, could have on competition in the marketplace, we urge you to investigate them and consider whether any action is necessary. We look forward to working with you to ensure that Americans can continue to realize the benefits of cheaper, cleaner renewable fuel.
Tags See All Tags