- Buy OEM Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium with SP2 (32 bit)
- 299.95$ Red Giant Keying Suite 11 (64-bit) cheap oem
- Buy OEM Acala DivX to iPod
- Buy Microsoft Windows 7 Professional with SP1 (32 bit & 64 bit) (en,ar,bg,cs,da,de,el,es,et,fi,fr,he,hr,hu,it,ja,ko,lt,lv,nb,nl,pl,pt,ro,ru,sk,sl,sr,sv,th,tr,uk)
- 399.95$ Eyeon Fusion 6 (64 bit) cheap oem
- Buy Autodesk ImageModeler 2009 MAC (en)
- Buy GibbsCAM 2014 64-bit (en)
- Buy OEM Paragon Drive Backup Professional 8.5
- Buy Cheap Abbyy FineReader 9.0 Professional
- Download Lynda.com - Analyzing Your Web Site to Improve SEO
- Buy Cheap Corel Home Office 5 (Personal & Business)
- Download Acala DivX to iPod
- Buy Adobe Photoshop Elements 10 & Adobe Premiere Elements 10 (en,de,fr,ja)
- Download AAA Logo 2010 Business Edition 3
|Religion Vs. Science – The Debate is Over, Engineering Physicist Says|
|News Releases - General Info|
|Written by Ginny Grimsley|
|Friday, 24 August 2012 11:51|
Large swaths of Americans seem to have drastically different views of how humans came to be, according to a June Gallup poll.
Nearly half of America – 46 percent – agrees with the creationist view that humans are purely the product of God, absent of evolution, within the last 10,000 years. Fifteen percent believe humans evolved independent of God, which is 6 percent more than 30 years ago.
These millions of Americans are pitted on two sides of a conflictwhich has a solution, says engineering physicist Daniel Friedmann, CEO of the aerospace company known for building the space station’s robotic arm and author of The Genesis One Code (www.danielfriedmannbooks.com)
“The creation-evolution conflict is a recurring point of contention in the United States, from the presidential election to what should be taught in schools,” he says. “American science legend Carl Sagan tried to settle this conflict by calling both camps ‘non-overlapping magisteria’ – in other words, science and religion each preside as the source of wisdom over separate domains.”
Friedmann argues that both wisdoms are two sides of the same coin and can enlighten each other. The reason the debate developed in the first place, he says, is because the discoveries of modern science of an old Earth seemed to conflict with descriptions in the Bible of a young Earth.
“People believed both could not be right,” he says. “It had to be one or the other – science or religion.”
But they both agree on the timeline for the development of the universe and life on Earth, Friedmann says. He has developed a formula that converts “Bible time” to years as we know them. When applied to calculating the age of the universe and life on Earth, the Bible consistently matches scientific estimates derived from the study of fossil timelines, the solar system and the cosmos.
His formula -- 1,000 X 365 X 7,000 –was derived from references in religious texts and science. The first number is found in Psalms, which says a year for God is 1,000 years for mortals. The second refers to the amount of days in one solar year. The third comes from scriptural study that indicates one creation day in Genesis equals 7,000 God years.
When those numbers are multiplied in human years, each creation day is an epoch of 2.56 billion years, he says. Using the formula, the biblical age of the universe is 13.74 billion years. Scientific estimates put the universe’s age at 13.75 billion, plus or minus 0.13 billion, he says.
“I have nothing but respect for scientists like Sagan and Stephen Hawking, but I feel that both were wrong about religion to varying degrees, especially Dr. Hawking,” he says. “Last year, Hawking dismissed religion, publicly calling it a ‘fairy tale’ for people who are afraid of death. I think that is a terriblynaive and misinformed view of what millions of people have believed in for more than a millennium.”
These are a few of the reasons Hawking is wrong, Friedmann says:
About Daniel Friedmann
Daniel Friedmann is CEO of MDA, anaerospace company in Canada, which among other things, specializes in robotics used on the international space station. He has a master’s in engineering physics and 30 years’ experience in the space industry. He has published more than 20 peer-reviewed scientific papers on space industry topics. He is also a longtime student of cosmology and religion.
Tags See All Tags