WASHINGTON D.C. - EMILY's List today introduced a new tool aimed at women voters to evaluate the 2012 Republican presidential candidates' potential impact on women's health, jobs, retirement security, choice, workplace fairness, women and families, and more.

The EMILY'S List "Republican Presidential Scorecard" shows the candidates who scored worst on women's issues (in order of most egregious): former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich; Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-MN); former Governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney is tied with Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX); former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA); former Governor of Utah Jon Huntsman; and Governor of Texas Rick Perry.

The issues on which candidates are most damaging to women and families are "Access to Women's Health and Choice," "Retirement and Medicare," and "Jobs." For the women and families of Iowa, these candidates' stances on the jobs bill alone could negatively impact 69,100 women who own their own businesses, which employ 57,900 Iowans.  Moreover, the cuts to Medicaid and Medicare that these candidates support would cut benefits for 172,500 Iowa women and 43,000 Iowa Seniors.

To access additional information on the "Republican Presidential Scorecard" featured below, please see the EMILY's List website: http://emilyslist.org/scorecard

 

*** MANDATORY CREDIT EMILY'S LIST***

The EMILY's List "Republican Presidential Scorecard" will be an ongoing effort to communicate with women voters about the Presidential race and what's at stake. The scorecard will be continually updated to adjust to the changing dynamics of the primary.

State-specific impacts of the positions advocated by the Republican candidates will be released in early primary and caucus states, with a paid on-line media component.

In the 2009-2010 cycle, EMILY's List raised more than $38.5 million to support its mission of recruiting and supporting women candidates, helping them build strong campaigns, and mobilizing women voters to turn out and vote. With a community of more than 900,000 members across the country, EMILY's List is one of the largest political action committees in the nation. Since its founding in 1985, EMILY's List has worked to elect 86 pro-choice Democratic women to the U.S. House, 16 to the U.S. Senate, nine governors, and hundreds of women to the state legislatures, state constitutional offices, and other key local offices. In the 2009-2010 cycle, EMILY's List had the largest number of members and donors in our 25 year history.

For more information on EMILY's List, please visit www.emilyslist.org.
Dear Friends of the Kosciuszko Foundation,

Many of you remember that Jan Karski was a member of the Kosciuszko Foundation for decades. The photo above shows Karski during one of his many talks at the Kosciuszko Foundation. While Karski is known as the man who tried to stop the Holocaust by urging Roosevelt and Churchill to take action, he was also a diplomat, resistance fighter against the murderous regimes of Hitler and Stalin, and a Professor at Georgetown University. Ever vigilant as a champion of justice, he was a true Polish hero.

 

On April 7, 2011, the executrix of Jan Karski's estate, Kaya Mirecka-Ploss and I wrote to President Obama asking him to award Karski with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. We are pleased to announce that the campaign is gaining momentum, and so far, 11 United States Senators and 66 Members of the House of Representatives have signed on to a letter in support of President Obama awarding this posthumous honor to Professor Karski.

 

Members of the steering committee that have been pushing the campaign include : Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter; Robert L. Billingsley, Co-Chair, Georgetown University Jan Karski Centennial Campaign; David Harris, Executive Director, American Jewish Committee; Andrzej Rojek, Kosciuszko Foundation Trustee; and Wanda Urbanska, Director of the Jan Karski U.S. Centennial Campaign.

 

As a beneficiary of Karski's estate, the Kosciuszko Foundation believes it is important to keep Karski's legacy alive. If you have time, please take a moment and call the White House comment line at (202) 456-1111 and ask the President to confer this long-overdue honor on Dr. Karski. If the line is busy, please keep trying.

 

To learn more about the campaign to honor Jan Karski visit: http://www.jankarski.net/

 

I wish you all a very Merry Christmas,

Happy Chanukah,

and a fantastic New Year!

 

Alex Storozynski

President & Executive Director

(Washington, DC) - Today, Social Security Works unveiled a new guide which reveals that the top six Republican Presidential candidates agree: If they had their way, they would cut or do away with Social Security, America's most successful insurance program. The guide shows that when these Republican Presidential candidates say we need to "save" Social Security, what they really mean is we need to end Social Security.

"Iowa caucus-goers should know that the Republican candidates are out of touch on the issue of Social Security," said Nancy Altman, co-director of Social Security Works.  "Tea Partiers, mainstream Republicans, Democrats, and Independents all overwhelmingly support Social Security, oppose benefit cuts, including opposing raising the retirement age, and oppose trading the program's guaranteed retirement income for the gamble of the Wall Street 'casino.'  In contrast, as the guide reveals, the Republican candidates favor raising the retirement age and partially privatizing the program.  They outrageously defame Social Security by calling this trust, which holds workers' hard earned contributions, a Ponzi scheme, a fraud, or even, unconstitutional, notwithstanding that its constitutionality was upheld three-quarters of a century ago."

"The Republican candidates - all six of the front-runners - could not be more out of step with the American people!  Americans -- Democrats, Independents, and, yes, Republicans -- overwhelmingly support Social Security and oppose the kinds of radical cuts and changes the Republican candidates favor. They can't afford to have their benefits cut   and they do not want Wall Street bankers and other campaign contributors to steal their and their children's Social Security," said Eric Kingson, co-chair of the Strengthen Social Security Campaign.

Social Security provides benefits to nearly 600,000 Iowans, including more than 70,000 Iowa workers with disabilities.  With less than three weeks to go before the Iowa Caucuses, Social Security has a lot at stake on the caucus outcome.  The brief guide below includes such horrible gems as "fraud" and "privatization" language from Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Rick Perry, Michelle Bachmann, and Rick Santorum.

Called Social Security A Fraud, Ponzi Scheme, or Unconstitutional

Wants to Raise the Social Security Retirement Age

Supports Some Form of Privatization

MICHELE
BACHMANN

[Social Security] "is a tremendous fraud. no company could get away with this, they'd be thrown in jail if they ever tried to do what the federal government did with people's Social Security money."

-Fox News, February 17, 2010

Voted to raise the Social Security retirement age to 70, which would cut benefits by up to 20 percent for new beneficiaries when fully phased in.

-Voted Yes on Republican Study Committee Budget, Roll call Vote 275, April 15, 2011

"But people that are younger than [10 years away from retirement], they need to have some options in their lives, so that going forward they can have an ownership of their own Social Security, their own retirement."

-Fox News, February 17, 2010

NEWT
GINGRICH

"it is a fraud and a lie the way that congress deals with Social Security."

-Cain-Gingrich Debate, november 5, 2011

No position stated.

"any candidate who is not prepared to give younger americans the right to choose [a private account] has no serious plan for Social Security."

-Cain-Gingrich Debate, November 5, 2011

RON
PAUL

"Technically, [Social Security is unconstitutional]. ...there's no authority [in the constitution for it]."

-(Fox News Sunday, May 15, 2011)

No direct position, but Paul sees it as irrelevant since he would dismantle the entire program and allow people to opt-out of Social Security.

-(MSNBC interview, April 27, 2011)

"But I want to privatize the retirement funds and put the responsibility on the individual."

-(CNN Situation Room interview, September 8, 2010)

RICK
PERRY

Social Security "is a Ponzi scheme for these young people. ...the idea that [young people] are working and paying into Social Security today, that the current program is going to be there for them... is a monstrous lie on this generation, and we can't do that to them."

-Iowa Caucus event at the Vine Coffeehouse,

8/27/11

"if you're a forty-five year-old or less, we're going to move that retirement age up to sixty-nine or seventy."

-Town Hall, 9/5/11

"if only the new Dealers had been kind enough to allow workers to make their own choice about whether to participate [in Social Security]. as we know from experience, individuals would have done better on their own [with private accounts]."

-Fed Up, 2010, page 61

MITT
ROMNEY

"There simply is no [trust] 'fund' safely invested somewhere... to put it in a nutshell, the American people have been effectively defrauded out of their Social Security. ... let's look at what would happen if someone in the private sector did a similar thing... They would go to jail. But what has happened to the people responsible for the looming bankruptcy of Social Security? They keep returning to congress every two years."

-No Apology, 2010, pp. 172-3

"Alternatively, we could gradually raise the retirement age. this does have a certain logic to it..."

-No Apology, 2010, p. 173

"One thing that [President Bush] proposed, and it's a good idea, is to take some of that money, or all of that surplus [Social Security] money and allow people to have a personal account."

-town hall, 6/5/2007

RICK
SANTORUM

No position stated.

"I proposed [raising the retirement age] back in 1994, and I think that's an option that has to be on the table."

-(Meet the Press, June 12, 2011)

"We're in the middle of a phase-up [in the retirement age] to age 67...We need to continue to do that."

-(Remarks at Lancaster, SC, September 13, 2011)

"Personal retirement accounts provide individuals?not the government?with control and ownership. and they hold the promise of a greater return for future generations than what they are promised by today's Social Security system."

-(the Hill, March 1, 2005)

###

AARP Connects Issues, Candidates, Voters at Upcoming Iowa and National Forums

Association's 2012 "Vote for Retirement Security" Campaign Aims to Keep Voters' 50+ Top Concerns Front and Center

DES MOINES, Dec. 9, 2011?This weekend AARP is kicking its 2012 Presidential voter education and engagement campaign activities into high gear, starting with the ABC-TV Presidential Debate at Drake University on Saturday, Dec. 10, continuing through the Fox News Debate on Thursday, Dec. 15 in Sioux City, and up to the Iowa Caucus on Jan. 3.

"This is crunch time for making sure that the candidates know what is at stake for Iowa voters on the critical issues of retirement security," said Pete Jeffries, AARP National Campaigns Field Manager.  "Overwhelming majorities of likely caucus goers age 18 and over are concerned about protecting Social Security and Medicare from budget cuts, and they're extremely concerned about jobs and being able to save for their retirement.  We're working to ensure that the candidates are asked questions about these issues and that voters know where the candidates stand on these important pocketbook concerns."

In the tradition of AARP's 25-year history of non-partisan voter education efforts, the association's 2012 caucus and primary campaign is designed to engage, listen to and inform voters and the candidates on the major issues affecting older voters. This year's efforts launched in Iowa with a major AARP presence at the Iowa Straw Poll in August, and have picked up over the past few weeks with members and volunteers participating at candidate events in Des Moines and across the state asking questions on critical retirement security issues like jobs and the economy, Social Security and Medicare.

This weekend, AARP is providing pre-debate media packet information and sponsoring the post-debate Spin Room in the Drake Fine Arts Center on Saturday night to highlight the Association's new voter education website, www.aarp.org/YouEarnedIt The website features survey findings of GOP likely caucus and primary voters in the first four early nominating states and AARP's 2012 first-time Presidential Candidate Video Voters' Guide featuring four of the GOP candidates on jobs and the economy, retirement security, Social Security and Medicare. Iowa veteran political TV reporter Dave Price conducted the one-one-one unedited interviews with candidates who registered at 5% or higher in an average of national polls as of Oct. 3.  They include Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Congressman Ron Paul and Texas Governor Rick Perry.  Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney declined invitations to participate. The video voters' guide was produced by AARP in Des Moines with Mediacom.  In addition to posting at www.aarp.org/YouEarnedIt, the guides are being mailed to Republican voters in the early nominating states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Florida and Nevada.

AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization with a membership that helps people 50+ have independence, choice and control in ways that are beneficial and affordable to them and society as a whole. AARP does not endorse candidates for public office or make contributions to either political campaigns or candidates. We produce AARP The Magazine, the definitive voice for 50+ Americans and the world's largest-circulation magazine with nearly 35 million readers; AARP Bulletin, the go-to news source for AARP's millions of members and Americans 50+; AARP VIVA, the only bilingual U.S. publication dedicated exclusively to the 50+ Hispanic community; and our website, AARP.org. AARP Foundation is an affiliated charity that provides security, protection, and empowerment to older persons in need with support from thousands of volunteers, donors, and sponsors. We have staffed offices in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

# # #

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) today issued the following statement after President Obama announced that the last American troops in Iraq will return home by the end of December.

"The men and women serving in our armed forces have more than succeeded in accomplishing the mission we asked them to do in Iraq. They have served honorably and heroically and they should be commended. I support the President's decision to withdraw the remaining U.S. troops in Iraq by the end of the year.

"This misguided war has cost U.S. taxpayers more than $800 billion dollars and claimed the lives of 3,525 American service members and an untold number of soldiers who are physically and mentally injured.  The United States now has a responsibility to ensure that they receive the care they deserve.  I am pleased that U.S. involvement has come to an end in Iraq, I only regret it did not come sooner."
Two new ads capture momentum following 'Plan to Restore America' rollout
LAKE JACKSON, Texas - The Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign announced today the release of two new broadcast campaign ads that capitalize on the aggressive posture Dr. Paul displayed during his Las Vegas, Nevada "Plan to Restore America" launch.

The 30-second spot "Plan" clearly explains Paul's balanced budget plan to voters, and the 60-second spot "Consistent" compares his distinguished record of advocating conservative principles with the records of his establishment opponents Herman Cain, Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. 

"Plan" and "Consistent" are part of a two week, multi-million dollar blitz in the key early states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.  The campaign will also run radio versions of these spots, and complement the broadcast push with substantial voter outreach on the same topics.

"The absolutely positive reception of Ron Paul's 'Plan to Restore America' means we're obligated to meet an even higher standard of outreach and discussion," said Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton, a "Plan to Restore America" co-author.

"No other Republican candidate's economic plan matches that of Dr. Paul's, so in turn we thought it only right to follow with a worthy campaign advertising effort," said Mr. Benton.

To view "Plan" click here.  To view "Consistent" click here.
###
'Life' features Paul's prolife physician background
LAKE JACKSON, Texas - The Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign announced today the launch of a new prolife advertisement as part of its ongoing weeks-long, million-plus dollar ad buy.

The ad, titled 'Life,' will air beginning today on broadcast and cable television in Iowa and on radio in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada. 

The ad features Dr. Paul's recollection of his early years as a physician.  In particular, he recounts a time when he witnessed the tragic irony surrounding urgent medical care provided, and denied, to a wanted baby delivered prematurely and an unwanted baby that survived a late-term abortion.  

"This whole notion of life not being valuable just is something I was never able to accept," Dr. Paul says in his ad.

Dr. Paul is by trade an OB-GYN who personally delivered more than 4,000 babies.

To view the ad, please click here.
###
Authorized and paid for by Ron Paul 2012 PCC Inc. www.RonPaul2012.com
Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Senator Chuck Grassley issued the following comment about his vote against President Obama's proposal to spend $447 billion for economic stimulus.

"Since the 2009 stimulus bill was enacted, it's unclear that anything's been done to better safeguard the taxpayer dollars that would be pumped out in a second massive government spending bill like this one, despite the wasteful spending we saw with the first stimulus bill.  My own oversight pinpointed money for housing assistance squandered by gross mismanagement, funds going to contractors and grantees who owed the government hundreds of millions of dollars in tax debts, stimulus dollars directed to school districts known for poor fiscal management, big spending for electronic records conversion in a health technology system not yet prepared to handle it, programs to create green jobs that didn't result in any jobs, and trouble even defining what qualified as a green job.  Weatherization grants funded by the first stimulus program even created safety hazards because monitoring, testing and tracking the work fell by the wayside.

"What's more, President Obama's first stimulus bill didn't keep the unemployment rate down, and it's unclear how this one would create and sustain jobs.  Beyond that, whatever the details of the tax increase, there's plenty of evidence that raising taxes in a struggling economy only makes things worse.  Plus, since World War II, every dollar in new taxes has resulted in $1.17 in government spending.  We need to reduce government spending, not increase it.  Growing deficits and debt get in the way of economic growth and opportunity.

"Instead of a proposal that emphasizes higher taxes and more government spending, it's time for a new approach in Washington for economic recovery.  Private-sector employers need more certainty.  They need to know that higher taxes and more burdensome regulations are not just around the corner.  They need an international trade agenda that opens up new opportunities to sell U.S. manufactured products and services.  Affordable energy is needed, too.  It's time to ramp up production of traditional energy sources here at home and to expand alternative and renewable energy sources.   Above all, Washington needs to do what it can to give employers confidence and encourage the entrepreneurial spirit of big and small businesses nationwide."

-30-

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Grassley Presses President Obama for Answers to Backdoor Amnesty Policies

WASHINGTON - Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Chuck Grassley is leading 18 colleagues in questioning the administration's immigration policies that go beyond the scope of the law and allow people who have broken our laws to remain in the country.  The Senate Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over federal immigration policy.

In a letter sent late yesterday, the senators cite a June 17th memo and an August 18th directive which outline and encourage increased use of prosecutorial discretion and administrative closure of cases pending before the courts.

"The administration has repeatedly ignored and dismissed our reservations with its policies that circumvent Congress and provide a safe-haven for illegal immigrants.  Its policies ignore the rule of law and take the powers provided to the administration to an entirely new level," Grassley said.

Cosigners of the letter with Grassley are Senators David Vitter of Louisiana, Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Orrin G. Hatch of Utah, Jim DeMint of South Carolina, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, James E. Risch of Idaho, Mike Crapo of Idaho, John Boozman of Arkansas, Mike Lee of Utah, James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, Johnny Isakson of Georgia, Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Mike Johanns of Nebraska, John Barrasso of Wyoming and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.

Here is a copy of the letter.  A signed copy can be found here.

 

September 26, 2011

President Barack Obama

The White House

Washington, D.C. 20500

 

Dear Mr. President:

 

We write to express serious concern about your immigration policies and ask that you require the Department of Homeland Security to overturn recent directives regarding the increased use of prosecutorial discretion.  We also request that the Administration halt any initiative, whether through regulation or otherwise, that circumvents Congress or aims to ensure that illegal immigrants are afforded every possibility to remain in this country.

 

After the release of the June 17th Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) memorandum, which called for the increased use of prosecutorial discretion, several members of the Senate wrote to Assistant Secretary John Morton.  While prosecutorial discretion is justifiable in certain cases, this initiative may result in an impermissible intrusion on Congress's plenary authority over immigration law.  Accordingly, we asked Assistant Secretary Morton to rescind the memorandum outlining ICE's prosecutorial discretion policies.  That request has been ignored.

 

We are also concerned that the initiative announced by Secretary Napolitano on August 18th will result in the administrative closure of an untold number of cases currently pending before our immigration and federal courts.  In combination with the June 17th ICE memo, these new policies send the message that your Administration is turning a blind eye to those who have broken our immigration laws.  We are also concerned that these policies appear to be a direct attempt to categorically legalize those who are unlawfully in the country and to allow undocumented individuals to remain in violation of the law without fear of apprehension or deportation.  The security of our country depends on our ability to prevent unlawful entry and to respond when such criminals have overstayed their visa or avoided inspection.  These policies have the potential to undermine the rule of law and threaten our nation's security.

 

While we appreciate Secretary Napolitano's assurances that these initiatives will not provide categorical relief for any group, we remain concerned about statements being made by certain advocates and members of Congress.  For example, in a September 20th speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Senator Dick Durbin stated that these initiatives "pave the way" for DREAM Act students.  He further stated that "[the Administration] said recently that those eligible for the DREAM Act, good moral character, graduates of high school and pursuing college degrees are not going to be their targets."  The United States Senate and the American people have rejected the DREAM Act and the Executive Branch is not entitled to bypass that determination by administrative fiat. 

 

Further, in a recent speech before the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute, Congressman Luis Gutierrez stated:  "[President Obama] said, 'But I can't bypass Congress,' and people in the audience said, 'Yes you can,' and you want to know something? They were right - he could and he did."  Such statements will only create a rush to the border and encourage the undocumented population to come forward in hopes of receiving a benefit.

 

There is still time to correct this path.  We request that you promptly rescind these initiatives, dismantle the working group designed to identify "low priority" cases before our immigration and federal courts, and direct the agencies within the Department of Homeland Security to abide by our Nation's immigration laws.  We also ask that you make Secretary Napolitano available to members of the Senate for questioning about the Department's immigration enforcement policies, including granting parole, deferred action, and prosecutorial discretion to keep unlawful immigrants in this country.

 

Finally, we reiterate our strong commitment to ensuring that the Administration has all of the resources it needs to carry out and enforce our immigration laws.  It is unjustifiable for the Administration to sidestep Congress to implement policies that are contrary to the law and the wishes of the American people.  We look forward to your timely response.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Charles E. Grassley                                                David Vitter

Jeff Sessions                       Orrin G. Hatch

Jim DeMint                         Tom Coburn

James E. Risch                          Mike Crapo

John Boozman                        Mike Lee

James M. Inhofe                         Saxby Chambliss

Johnny Isakson                        Michael B. Enzi

Rand Paul                           Roy Blunt

Mike Johanns                        John Barrasso

Ron Johnson

DES MOINES - Thursday, September 22th, OFA Iowa will hold an office opening party and phone bank for volunteers and supporters in Davenport.

Organizing for America has been engaging and training volunteers and building new supporters since the President was inaugurated.  Since the launch of the re-election campaign in April, OFA Iowa staff and volunteers have held over 100 trainings, planning sessions, house parties, and phone banks.  OFA Iowa volunteers have made over 100,000 calls to supporters and held 2,298 one-on-one conversations. Through these efforts, OFA Iowa has collected over 20,000 "I'm In" commitments from across the state.

OFA Iowa is opening eight campaign offices -- Cedar Rapids, Sioux City, Des Moines, Waterloo, Davenport, Iowa City, Dubuque, and Council Bluffs.

WHO: OFA Iowa

WHAT: Davenport Office Opening

WHERE: Scott County Democrats Office, Midtown Plaza, 1706 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52808

WHEN: Thursday, September, 22, 5:30-7:30 pm

To find out more about the Iowa campaign please visit http://www.barackobama.com/state/ia. Iowans can also connect with the campaign on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/IowaOFA, and on Twitter at http://twitter.com/OFA_IA.

###

Pages