The
article this sidebar accompanies is less about ethanol than it is
about government encouraging agricultural practices that aren't
sustainable and do more harm than good to communities. Author Kamyar
Enshayan argues that the federal government, in particular, should
divert some agricultural subsidies into re-building sustainable local
economies. Championing ethanol as the savior of the Midwestern farm,
he claims, is a losing proposition.
To be clear, Enshayan said that ethanol is superior to gasoline in terms of its desirability as a source of energy. "Gasoline is terrible," he said. But he added that conservation and other options aren't being considered as alternatives to ethanol and gasoline. "We're in an addictive situation," he said of the United States' energy consumption. "What do we do to get out of it?"
Last
month, a group of 27 business leaders from the Quad Cities sent a
letter to the chairpersons of the area's four largest
economic-development entities. That, in itself, is noteworthy, but
the letter is full of curious features:
