I'm not a big fan of third-party candidates.

It's not that I'm ecstatic about the two-party system. Too many "mainstream" candidates are poll-driven media robots to the point that they make me a little batty.

I wouldn't mind having another choice, if only to force the other candidates to stop acting like automatons and start speaking like human beings again.

The problem is that third-party candidates are usually a bit, um, goofy. Two words: Ross Perot. Need I say more?

In Illinois, third-party candidates spend almost all their time whining about our rigid ballot-access laws instead of actually doing any work.

They have a point about the requirements for third-party candidates. "Established parties" such as the Democrats and the Republicans only have to gather 5,000 signatures for their statewide candidates, while third parties have to collect 25,000 signatures. And considering that someone from the establishment is almost guaranteed to challenge the validity of those signatures, they actually have to gather far more than 25,000.

That's a lot of work, to be sure, and perhaps the bar could be lowered. But an argument that many third parties have been making - that our state law is so rigid that no party has ever managed to get around it - may finally be blown out of the water for good.

The Green Party claims to have collected more than 35,000 valid signatures for its slate of statewide candidates, 10,000 more than they need. Plus, as I write this, they were planning a last-minute push in Chicago and Champaign-Urbana to pad their totals even more.

Ralph Nader ran as a Green Party candidate for president two years ago and collected 34,000 Illinois signatures. It wasn't enough. The Democratic Party of Illinois went through his petitions line by line and knocked him off the ballot.

This time around, the Greens say they've learned some lessons and have had volunteers verifying and validating every single signature they've collected.

There's another potential third-party candidate named Randy Stufflebeam who says on his Web site that he's a "long way" from his petition goals. Stufflebeam is a social conservative, and word is that a certain prominent Democrat was preparing to help him gather signatures on the final weekend, until a reporter called and the Dem had to cancel the scam. The idea was that Stufflebeam would take votes away from pro-choice, pro-gay-rights Republican candidate for governor Judy Baar Topinka. But now it doesn't look like he'll make it.

It's possible that the Green Party would take votes away from Governor Rod Blagojevich, particularly among young people and disaffected Democrats who couldn't bring themselves to cast a protest vote for a Republican. In a close race, the Greens could be a deciding factor.

But the election is still a long way away. First they have to withstand the inevitable challenge. Then they will have to convince the civic groups and media outlets that will sponsor the upcoming debates to include them. And they'll also have to persuade reporters to write stories about them.

A spokesperson for the Green Party said they had already sent letters to both Blagojevich and Topinka demanding to be included in the debates. Good luck with that.

My own opinion is that if any party has enough organizational strength to survive a ballot challenge in a state with literally the toughest third-party ballot-access laws in the world, then they ought to be considered legitimate.

That means they should be included in all the debates, no matter what their poll numbers might be. And it means that people like myself should include them in our regular campaign coverage.

Back in 2002, an old acquaintance called with a startling pronouncement. She had been out of the state for the previous two years and was now working on a campaign that I was kind of picking on.

She said she had spent the weekend reading every issue for the past two years of my daily newsletter, Capitol Fax, and realized that what I respected the most was solid organization. After chiding her for wasting her weekend, I said she was right. She then pitched a story about how her campaign had organized a huge event for young professionals that would pack Chicago's Navy Pier. Naturally, I gave that story a lot of play.

And now I promise to give the Greens the coverage they're due if they make it over this nearly impossible hurdle. Others should as well.


Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax, a daily political newsletter. He can be reached at (http://www.thecapitolfaxblog.com).

Support the River Cities' Reader

Get 12 Reader issues mailed monthly for $48/year.

Old School Subscription for Your Support

Get the printed Reader edition mailed to you (or anyone you want) first-class for 12 months for $48.
$24 goes to postage and handling, $24 goes to keeping the doors open!

Click this link to Old School Subscribe now.

Help Keep the Reader Alive and Free Since '93!


"We're the River Cities' Reader, and we've kept the Quad Cities' only independently owned newspaper alive and free since 1993.

So please help the Reader keep going with your one-time, monthly, or annual support. With your financial support the Reader can continue providing uncensored, non-scripted, and independent journalism alongside the Quad Cities' area's most comprehensive cultural coverage." - Todd McGreevy, Publisher