May 11, 2012...Animal Family Veterinary Care Center (Animal Family), Davenport, IA, will host an open house on Saturday, May 19, 2012, from 11 AM to 1 PM at 6011 North Brady Street, Davenport.

The open house will feature tours of the care center, refreshments and prizes, plus activities for the kids, including games, face-painting and more. There will also be pet care demonstrations and visits with zoo animals. It will be fun for the whole family!

Animal Family offers a full range of veterinary services, including the most up-to-date diagnostic, surgical, dental, and imaging tools and techniques.

Animal Family also provides the very best in pet grooming, dog training, pet boarding and Camp Canine. Camp Canine is a day care that offers a safe place to socialize your 4-legged family members.

For additional information, please call Animal Family Veterinary Care Center at 563-391-9522 or visit animalfamilyveterinarycare.com.

-END-

Animal Family Veterinary Care Center ? 6011 North Brady Street ? Davenport, IA ? 52806-2146 ? 563-391-9522

Listen to More than the 'American Anti-Sovereignty Campaign'

Washington, D.C., May 11, 2012- In a choreographed roll-out yesterday - transparently timed to coincide with the end of Senator Richard Lugar's ill-fated primary race for reelection to the United States Senate, a group styling itself the "American Sovereignty Campaign" announced that it would be mounting an aggressive effort to secure ratification of the obsolete and defective Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).  Given the threat LOST poses to U.S. sovereignty and vital interests, a better moniker for this entity would be the "American Anti-Sovereignty Campaign."

A previously organized coalition that actually supports American sovereignty - the Coalition to Preserve American Sovereignty - responded by calling on Sen. Lugar, the Ranking Minority Member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and his Democratic counterpart, Chairman John Kerry, to assure the record reflects the insights of the treaty's many critics, not just its boosters.
In a letter to the two Senators (below), the pro-sovereignty Coalition identified a number of LOST's defects that should require close scrutiny.  It also identified a number of expert witnesses who could illuminate them and urged the Foreign Relations Committee to hear from such authorities.
The Coalition welcomes an honest, open debate about a treaty that was largely drafted when the Soviet Union and Non-Aligned Nations were still going concerns and dominated the United Nations and Law of the Sea negotiations.  If the Senate actually deliberates on this accord - rather than following the appalling 2010 precedent of hastily rubber-stamping the Obama administration's unverifiable and inequitable New START Treaty, the outcome seems certain:  The Senate will reject the LOST Treaty, as did President Ronald Reagan 30 years ago.

Text of the Letter

10 May 2012

Hon. John Kerry
Chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
444 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-0802

Hon. Richard G. Lugar
Ranking Minority Member, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
446 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-0802

Dear Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member Lugar:

We understand that you will soon convene hearings in connection with possible U.S. ratification of the United Nations' Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).  It is our view that this accord is seriously defective in a number of respects (several of which are enumerated below.)  Accordingly, we write to request that the individuals listed below be afforded an opportunity to testify in connection with the Foreign Relations Committee's consideration of LOST with respect to the following problematic provisions of that treaty - an opportunity largely not afforded to critics of LOST during the last round of your panel's hearings on the matter in 2003 and 2007.

First, ratification of LOST would commit the United States to submit to mandatory dispute resolution with respect to U.S. military and industrial operations.  While LOST proponents argue that the United States will choose available arbitration mechanisms to avoid legal decisions from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), such arbitration panels are no-less perilous for U.S. interests as the decisive, "swing" arbiters would be appointed by generally unfriendly UN-affiliated bureaucrats.  The arbitration panels can also be relied upon to look to rulings by the ICJ or ITLOS to inform their own decisions.

Furthermore, while there is a LOST provision exempting "military activity" from such dispute resolution mechanisms, the Treaty makes no attempt to define "military activity," virtually guaranteeing that such matters will be litigated - in all likelihood to our detriment - before one or another of LOST's arbitration mechanisms.  And the rulings of such arbitrators cannot be appealed.

Subjecting our military to the risks of such mandatory dispute resolution is all the more imprudent given that LOST provides the Navy with no navigational rights and freedoms beyond those it already enjoys under customary international law and the U.S. Freedom of Navigation Program.  The Navy has successfully protected American interests on the seas for the past two hundred years without the United States becoming a party to LOST - including during the thirty years since LOST was concluded, in 1982.  We see no compelling reason why that record will be improved upon by entrusting the job to international legal arrangements.

Second, the Law of the Sea Treaty contains provisions that risk putting sensitive, militarily useful information and technology in the hands of America's adversaries and its companies' commercial competitors.  That accord's proponents would have you believe that there is no problem with technology transfer since the Treaty's relevant mandates were eliminated by a 1994 agreement relating to the implementation of LOST's Part XI.  Unfortunately, this is another area that cries out for close examination by the Senate and the Nation.

For one thing, it is unclear to what extent the Treaty could be and was amended by the '94 accord.  For another, a number of provisions obligating the transfer of potentially sensitive technology and data were not addressed in the latter agreement.  For example, LOST arbitration procedures specify that parties to a dispute would be required to provide an arbitral tribunal with "all relevant documents, facilities and information" - a potential avenue for compelling such transfers.

Third, the Law of the Sea Treaty entails commitments that have far-reaching implications for U.S. businesses, far beyond the possibility of mandatory technology transfers.  These include : embroiling this country in treaties bearing on commercial activities to which it is not a party; wide-ranging, intrusive and expensive environmental obligations; creating standing for foreign nationals to pursue alien torts in our courts; and jeopardizing our rights under the World Trade Organization, which was established after 1994.

Of particular concern is the fact that LOST creates an international taxation regime.  It does so by empowering the International Seabed Authority (ISA) to tax Americans for the purposes of meeting its own administrative costs and of globally redistributing revenue derived from the exploitation of seabed resources.  The wisdom of such compulsory payments to the ISA is highly questionable, considering the poor track record of international organizations' management of finances.  Moreover, the ISA would be unconstrained in its discretion as to which countries or entities were to receive this redistributed American wealth, the recipients of which could include highly corrupt and undemocratic regimes or even countries identified by the Department of State as sponsors of terrorism.   

We believe the Foreign Relations Committee's deliberations on the Law of the Sea Treaty will be incomplete, perhaps misleadingly so, unless they are informed by testimony on these and related points.  We formally request that you and your colleagues ensure that the following individuals are afforded an opportunity to provide such testimony:

Donald Rumsfeld                       Former Secretary of Defense
Edwin Meese                          Former United States Attorney General
John R. Bolton                         Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations
John F. Lehman                         Former Secretary of the Navy
William Middendorf                     Former Secretary of the Navy
Douglas J. Feith                          Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Admiral James A. Lyons                    Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet
Vice Admiral Robert Monroe             Former Director, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation
Phyllis Schlafly                       Eagle Forum
Fred Smith                          Competitive Enterprise Institute
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.                           Center for Security Policy
Doug Bandow                         Cato Institute
Steven Groves                         Heritage Foundation
Baker Spring                         Heritage Foundation
Thomas P. Kilgannon                      Freedom Alliance
Peter Leitner                        Author, Reforming the Law of the Sea Treaty
Kevin Kearns                         U.S. Business & Industry Council
John Fonte                          Hudson Institute
Jeremy Rabkin                         George Mason University School of Law

Sincerely,

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
Coalition to Preserve American Sovereignty
###

Braley seeking feedback from Iowans as Congress takes up Farm Bill this year

Waterloo, IA - Rep. Bruce Braley (IA-01) traveled to Independence, Vinton, Marengo, and Grinnell today as part of a two day series of listening sessions focused on the upcoming Farm Bill.

Bill Menner, Iowa Rural Development state director for the US Department of Agriculture, joined Braley at the events.  Braley and Menner will travel to Toledo and Marshalltown on Monday, May 14th, to continue the series of Farm Bill listening sessions.

"The Farm Bill is the single most important piece of legislation this year that affects Iowa jobs and the Iowa economy," Braley said.  "From renewable energy to conservation programs, from crop insurance to agricultural research and rural development, the Farm Bill has a huge impact on our state.  It's my job to listen to Iowans and get their feedback on what needs to be included in this important bill.  I'm working to make the Farm Bill a job creator in Iowa."

 

The Farm Bill listening session events were free and open to the public.

The current Farm Bill expires on September 30th of this year.  If Congress fails to act by that date, existing agricultural programs will end and America's farm policy will revert to the programs outlined in the 1949 Farm Bill - legislation written more than 60 years ago.

Last month, the US Senate passed a draft Farm Bill out of the Agriculture Committee - a significant step forward toward getting a bill passed this year.  The US House has not yet seen significant action on a Farm Bill.

# # #

Governor Branstad Announces Lifting of Iowa Traditional Ammo Ban

Fairfax, Va. - Governor Terry Branstad today announced that he will nullify the traditional ammunition ban in Iowa.  In July 2011, the Iowa Natural Resources Commission (NRC) imposed the ban - after the topic was debated and resoundingly rejected by the legislature - following the enactment of the first dove-hunting season since 1918.  The NRC slipped in the ban on the use of all traditional ammunition while setting bag limits and other regulations with regard to the reenacted Iowa dove-hunting season.

"The National Rifle Association would like to thank Governor Branstad for rescinding this ill-conceived scheme by the Iowa Natural Resources Commission," said Chris W. Cox, executive director of NRA's Institute for Legislative Action.  The NRC pandered to anti-hunting extremist groups and did their political bidding.  They failed to cite a single credible scientific study to back up their baseless claims to support this ban.  Today, thanks to the leadership of Governor Branstad and to the tireless efforts of Senator Dick Dearden, fairness, integrity and common-sense have been restored to this process."

Traditional ammunition bans are financed by extremist anti-hunting groups - like the Humane Society of the United States and the Sierra Club under the guise of "conservation efforts".  The long-term goals of these groups are to try to eradicate hunting and firearm ownership.  Their attempt to gain a foothold in Iowa has been foiled.

Earlier this year, House Joint Resolution 2001, restoring the use of traditional ammunition, passed the Iowa House of Representatives by an overwhelming, bipartisan margin.  The senate companion, SJR2001, passed the Senate Natural Resources Committee on a bipartisan 9-3 vote.  Despite broad bipartisan support and assurances, the Senate Majority Leader, failed to call-up the resolution for a vote.

In rejecting the ban today, Governor Branstad said, "As you may know, the Senate adjourned without bringing up the resolution nullifying the NRC rule banning traditional shot.  Today, I am exercising my legal power as Governor and rescinding the ban on traditional shot by Executive Order.  The determination of whether hunters should be forced to stop using traditional lead shot is the role of the legislature, not an unelected NRC."

The Commission's earlier attempt at a traditional ammunition ban was also defeated with Governor Terry Branstad's help in 2011.

-NRA-

May 11, 2012

Notice: The opinions posted on this site are slip opinions only. Under the Rules of Appellate Procedure a party has a limited number of days to request a rehearing after the filing of an opinion. Also, all slip opinions are subject to modification or correction by the court. Therefore, opinions on this site are not to be considered the final decisions of the court. The official published opinions of the Iowa Supreme Court are those published in the North Western Reporter published by West Group.

Opinions released before April 2006 and available in the archives are posted in Word format. Opinions released after April 2006 are posted to the website in PDF (Portable Document Format).   Note: To open a PDF you must have the free Acrobat Reader installed. PDF format preserves the original appearance of a document without requiring you to possess the software that created that document. For more information about PDF read: Using the Adobe Reader.

For your convenience, the Judicial Branch offers a free e-mail notification service for Supreme Court opinions, Court of Appeals opinions, press releases and orders. To subscribe, click here.

NOTE: Copies of these opinions may be obtained from the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Judicial Branch Building, 1111 East Court Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50319, for a fee of fifty cents per page.

No. 11-0525

STATE OF IOWA vs. JEFFREY DANA KURTH

No. 11-1498

EAST CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. MISSISSIPPI BEND AREA EDUCATION AGENCY

SPRINGFIELD - May 10, 2012. Governor Pat Quinn today issued a statement regarding passage of Senate Bill 1313:

"I am encouraged that legislators have taken this step towards restoring fiscal stability to Illinois. This legislation will help ensure that our retirees continue to have access to quality health care, while also lowering the cost to taxpayers.

"I would like to thank Senate President Cullerton, Senate Minority Leader Radogno, House Speaker Madigan and House Minority Leader Cross for their collaboration and leadership. I plan to sign this legislation and look forward to continuing to work together to make the difficult decisions necessary to return Illinois to sound financial footing."

###

While Rick Santorum openly discussed his Christian faith - and said it would not influence his would-be presidential decision-making - voters remain uncertain as to what role Mitt Romney's faith may play should he become president.

Immigration may prove to be the most dramatic religious-political conflict in Mitt Romney's bid for the nation's highest office. His great-grandfather fled across the U.S. border into Mexico in 1885 to escape persecution for his Mormon faith. His father was born in Chihuahua, an American colony in Mexico, in 1907. Both men were denied citizenship there due to the country's statutes.

Romney, who served as bishop over Boston Mormon churches for nearly a decade, compared the plight of his forefathers to that of current immigrants in America during a January speech in New Hampshire.

"He extended a sympathetic hand to Hispanic voters as a candidate," says California attorney Robert P. DesJardins, who studied the Mormon religion and its history for his newest novel, Land of the Saints (http://robertpdesjardins.authorsxpress.com/). "It's also a gesture that is consistent with the Mormon tradition of welcoming immigrants, both into the country and into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints."

The LDS Church has publicly supported the Utah Compact, signed into law in 2010, which advocates policies that "reaffirm our global reputation as a welcoming ... state" and reflect the nation's "history and spirit of inclusion."

But several conservatives, including those in the Minutemen Project, an activist group that patrols the U.S.-Mexican border, say the compact promotes tolerance and amnesty for illegal immigration. Conservatives simply do not know where Romney will side on the issue beyond 2012, which is one reason why the wealthiest Republican presidential candidate has had to endure an extended vetting process, DesJardins says.

"It's clear to most non-Mormons who have studied the religion that this view on immigration is meant to gain members," he says. But the spirit of inclusion has not applied to everyone.

"The earliest publications of the Book of Mormon, in the 1820s, states that dark-skinned people are 'cursed' because they rebelled against God, whereas the 'white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome' colored people were in God's good graces," he says. "Black men were not permitted to hold priesthood until 1978, and women still are not allowed to hold the position."

Conservatives fear Romney will say anything to get elected, he says. It's the same kind of conformity his church followed in relinquishing polygamy, a then-crucial pillar of the church, in order for Utah to gain statehood after 50 years of petitioning during the late 1800s. It's no coincidence black priests were permitted in the church only after the civil rights movement.

"While researching the religion I was surprised to learn about human deification, Kolob (claimed to be an actual planet existing nearest to Heaven), and 'Mormon underwear' - temple garments viewed either literally or symbolically to have powers to repel evil," DesJardins says.

Attempting to predict the future in politics, as a rule, tends to make fools out of pundits, he says. However, as is the case with most individuals, the best predictor of future behavior is the past.

"I hope conservatives have their beachwear ready in August for the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida," DesJardins says, "because I'm pretty sure Romney is bringing his flip-flops."

About Robert P. DesJardins

A successful California lawyer for more than 35 years, DesJardins is now a lecturer, private judge and judge pro tempore for the California Superior Court - in addition to being a novelist. In Land of the Saints, his third book, his main character is an attorney who finds himself drawn into the mysterious and dangerous world of Mormon spirituality after a friend is charged with murder. DesJardins is also the author of The Mistral and A Darker Shade of Orange.

The Facts:
-Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States. 1
-More than three million skin cancers are diagnosed annually - 11,590 cases will be fatal.1
-Non-melanoma skin cancer in the older population increased 77% from 1992-2006.2
-People under 30 years old that use tanning beds increase their risk of skin cancer by 75%.3
-Between 1973-2004, melanoma among women aged 15-39 has more than doubled. 4
-In an international study, melanoma has been linked to tanning bed usage. 4

Soderstrom Skin Institute will provide a FREE Skin Cancer Screening from 8 am to 12pm Saturday, May 19 at 1800 E. 54th Street in Davenport.  No appointment is necessary.

About 35 years ago, Soderstrom Skin Institute began FREE skin cancer screenings.  Today, more than 25,000 patients have been checked for atypical spots and changing moles, at Soderstrom Clinics. Moles or spots that have changed in size, shape, or color, have irregular borders that vary in color, that bleed or itch, or are larger than a pencil eraser, should be examined.

Soderstrom Skin Institute encourages anyone with a changing mole or spot on their skin to have it evaluated for the possibility of skin cancer. According to Soderstrom, one in 69 people will be diagnosed with a melanoma. The earlier melanoma is detected and removed, the better a patient's chance for survival.

"If you can spot it, you can stop it," Dr. Soderstrom says.

Over the past 35 years, Soderstrom Skin Institute has grown into one of the most comprehensive skin care facilities in the country. To learn more, visit SoderstromSkinInstitute.com.  To schedule an appointment at the Davenport office, please call (563) 344-7546.

1 American Cancer Society

2 Archives of Dermatology

3 International Agency for Research of Cancer

4
Skin Cancer Foundation

###

Report examines how many rural Americans benefit from provisions of the Affordable Care Act

Lyons, Nebraska - On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, the Center for Rural Affairs will release a new report entitled, The Affordable Care Act: Real Help for Real Rural People, the report documents findings about how many Americans have used or benefited from particular provisions of the Affordable Care Act.

Where possible, the report also estimates how many rural residents and families have used or benefited from Affordable Care Act provisions. These estimates on rural participation are unique to this report, extrapolating rural participation from general public participation data and, thereby, demonstrating the importance of these provisions to America's rural communities.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law on March 23, 2010. Since then numerous provisions have gone into effect or been implemented that impact health insurance coverage and provide new health care benefits for millions of Americans.

"As we have documented in a series of reports, many of these provisions are particularly applicable to rural people because of the demographics and unique economic circumstances of rural areas," said Jon Bailey, Director of Rural Research and Analysis at the Center for Rural Affairs and author of the report. "Of course, rural people and families in large numbers have also benefited from the more general provisions of the Affordable Care Act."

A full copy of the embargoed report can be viewed and downloaded at: http://files.cfra.org/pdf/real-help-rural-people.pdf, immediately and will remain available after the embargo is lifted. Center for Rural Affairs contacts are available for interview in advance of the lifting of the embargo.

Key findings in the report include
:

 

Provision People Helped Overall Rural People Helped
Young Adults with Health Insurance 2.5 million 440,000 additional
Medicare "Donut Hole" Beneficiaries 5.1 million seniors 1.1 million seniors
Medicare Annual Wellness Checks 2.3 million 500,000
Medicare Preventive Services 32.5 million seniors 6.8 million seniors
Preventive Services (Insured) 54 million 8.9 million
Lifting Lifetime Limits 105 million 17.3 million
Children with Pre-existing Conditions 17 million 3 million
Unreasonable Rate Increase Protection 76 million 12.5 million
Children's Preventive Services 40 million 6.6 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Some individuals will qualify for more than one provision

"On March 23rd the Affordable Care Act entered into its third year as the nation's fundamental public health care policy," continued Bailey. "We believe it is crucial at this time to reflect on what the Affordable Care Act really does... what it actually has to offer, especially to rural Americans who have faced stern challenges in finding and accessing quality, affordable health care coverage."

Pages