See below; and response from Jeremy Funk, Communications Director, Americans United for Change: "We're sure API President Jack Gerard just made an honest math error and forgot to carry nine zeroes somewhere in his calculations.  Seriously, if big oil can lie so shamelessly about the taxpayer subsidies everyone knows they reap, why should the EPA believe a word of their trash talk about the renewable fuels industry?  Big oil wants nothing more than to be rid of their cheaper, cleaner competition, so whatever they say about ethanol during this critical comment period on the proposed RFS rule must be taken with a grain of tar sand.   Big oil may get a lot more than zero in tax payer subsidies, but there is exactly zero chance that big oil will ever come close to producing enough domestically to meet U.S. oil consumption.  That's why it makes no sense to abandon the renewable fuels industry now at a time it's fulfilling 10% of our nation's fuel needs and at a time it's making incredible innovations that will fulfill more and more demand down the road."

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/01/09/1423351/oil-zero-subsidies/

 

Big Oil Lobby Claims The Industry 'Gets No Subsidies, Zero, Nothing' 

BY REBECCA LEBER  ON JANUARY 9, 2013 AT 2:23 PM

Despite ranking among the most profitable corporations in the world, Big Oil benefits from $4 billion in annual tax breaks. It fights to maintain them through aggressive political donations, lobbying, and heavy ad spending, but also employs another tactic: Pretending these tax breaks don't exist.

"The oil and gas industry gets no subsidies, zero, nothing," API President Jack Gerard said on Tuesday. "We get cost-recovery benefits, much like other industries. You can go down the road of allowing economic activity, generating hundreds of billions to the government, or you can take the alternative route by trying to extract new revenue from industry by increasing their cost to do business."

Tax deductions are indeed subsidies, as API admitted in a document that labeled "subsidies for alternative fuels" as "preferential tax treatment." And the oil industry's $4 billion preferential treatment is written permanently into the tax code. These include :

Percentage depletion allowance: lets companies deduct the costs of an oil or gas well, about 15 percent, from its taxes.

Domestic manufacturing tax deduction: Allows oil companies to collect $1.8 billion each year, even though there are vast differences between oil and traditional U.S. manufacturing. It is a benefit that was never intended for them, according to Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican, who said Congress included oil producers "almost inadvertently."

The foreign tax credit: Oil companies overwhelmingly fall into the category of companies that can claim credits for payments to foreign governments.

Expensing intangible drilling costs: For over a century, oil companies have written off wages, fuel, repairs, and hauling costs.

ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips have paid federal tax rates well below the 35 percent top corporate rate, a far cry from paying "more than our fair share". ExxonMobil, for instance, paid a 13 percent tax rate in 2011, after drilling deductions and benefits, and 14 percent on average between 2008 and 2010.

The record-high gas prices of 2012 reinforce the decades of data showing domestic drilling has very little impact on gas prices. At the same time, the Big Five companies are on track to collect more than $100 billion profit this year.

Support the River Cities' Reader

Get 12 Reader issues mailed monthly for $48/year.

Old School Subscription for Your Support

Get the printed Reader edition mailed to you (or anyone you want) first-class for 12 months for $48.
$24 goes to postage and handling, $24 goes to keeping the doors open!

Click this link to Old School Subscribe now.



Help Keep the Reader Alive and Free Since '93!

 

"We're the River Cities' Reader, and we've kept the Quad Cities' only independently owned newspaper alive and free since 1993.

So please help the Reader keep going with your one-time, monthly, or annual support. With your financial support the Reader can continue providing uncensored, non-scripted, and independent journalism alongside the Quad Cities' area's most comprehensive cultural coverage." - Todd McGreevy, Publisher