New Law Protects Minority Community Voting Rights; Increases Openness and Transparency in Redistricting Process

CHICAGO - March 7, 2011. Governor Pat Quinn today signed a bill into law that protects the voting rights of racial and language minority communities throughout Illinois and encourages public participation in the redistricting process.

"Ensuring that everyone's voice is heard in government is crucial to our democracy," said Governor Quinn. "This new law will help ensure that racial and language minority groups throughout our state are able to elect leaders accountable to their interests and concerns."

Senate Bill 3976 protects the voting rights of racial and language minority groups in Illinois by helping prevent a community's electoral identity from being weakened by being divided into multiple legislative districts. The new law creates the Illinois Voting Rights Act of 2011, which allows legislative districts to be drawn to create crossover districts, coalition districts or influence districts.

A crossover district is one in which a racial or language minority group makes up less than a majority of the voting age population, but is large enough to elect the candidate of its choice with some support from larger groups. A coalition district is one where several racial or language minority groups may join together to elect a candidate of their choice. An influence district is one where a racial or language minority can influence the outcome of an election, even if its preferred candidate cannot be elected.

The new law also ensures that the legislature will hold a minimum of four public hearings before passing future redistricting plans. The new law was sponsored by Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) and Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie (D-Chicago) and takes effect immediately.

"As we move forward with the redistricting process, this important new law gives us the tools and public input needed to create a map that is fair and representative of the people of Illinois," said Currie.

The ceremony was held at the Chinese American Service League, in Chicago's Chinatown neighborhood. The neighborhood is currently divided into four city wards, three state senate districts, four state representative districts and two county board districts. Community leaders say the neighborhood's division into so many districts has significantly reduced its influence in government, and that as a result, the area's interests are underrepresented.

This bill was supported by numerous community organizations, including: the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, the Coalition for a Better Chinese American Community, the Chinese American Service League, the Asian American Institute, the Korean American Resource and Cultural Center, the United African Organization, the Resurrection Project, and the United Congress of Religious and Community Organizations.

###

Grassley Fights Fraud in Medicare and Medicaid

 

WASHINGTON - Senator Chuck Grassley today introduced legislation to build on key reforms to fight fraud in Medicare and Medicaid.  The measure comes the day of a Senate Finance Committee hearing exploring ways to fight health care fraud.

 

"These are huge programs with billions of dollars going out in fraud each year," Grassley said.  "The bad actors are getting bigger and bolder all the time.  They're able to stay out of law enforcement's reach too often.  It says a lot when you hear organized crime has gotten into health care fraud because it's so profitable.  It's time to try new things.  Stopping bad payments before they go out instead of trying to collect them after the fact is common sense.  More transparency about billing and payments increases public understanding of where tax dollars go.   The bad actors might be dissuaded if they knew their actions were subject to the light of day.  Congress should act quickly to pass the reforms out of respect for taxpayers and on behalf of program beneficiaries."

 

Grassley said his bill includes provisions that would:

 

  • limit tax dollars lost to fraud by giving the government more time to pay Medicare providers when fraud, waste and abuse are suspected than is allowed under the existing pay-and-chase model;
  • enhance coordination among federal agencies responsible for fighting medical identity theft, in which thieves use personal and health insurance information to bill for medical treatment and prescription drugs fraudulently;
  • stop payments for illegal, unapproved drugs;
  • beef up enforcement capabilities by expanding the range of individuals subject to penalties; and
  • require Medicare claims and payment data to be available to the public by provider name for the first time, similar to other federal spending disclosed on www.USAspending.gov.

 

Grassley said the Strengthening Program Integrity and Accountability in Health Care Act of 2011 is comprised of reforms with bipartisan support.  Grassley led the development of a number of fraud-fighting provisions during the bipartisan work in the Senate in the last Congress on comprehensive health care legislation.  Some of the items were enacted, but others were not and are included in Grassley's new bill.  He also introduced the Medicare payment reform measure in the last Congress.

 

The federal government spent $502 billion on Medicare and $379 billion on Medicaid in fiscal year 2009.  It is estimated between $40 billion and $70 billion was lost to fraud that year.

 

The federal False Claims Act is one of the most effective tools against health care fraud.  Grassley authored a major update of this law, in 1986, with Rep. Howard Berman of California.  Since then, the law has recovered more than $28 billion and deterred billions of dollars in additional fraud against the taxpayers.  The whistleblower provisions that were created by the 1986 update are among the most successful elements of the False Claims Act.   This year, the False Claims Act brought in $3 billion in recoveries, with $2.5 billion from health care fraud cases, and nearly $2.4 billion of the recoveries thanks to the qui tam whistleblower provisions.

 

Grassley also is working to ensure that the civil recovery of public dollars that otherwise would be lost to fraud is buttressed by a robust criminal prosecution.  At the end of last year, he asked the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to account for the falling number of criminal prosecutions.  He also intends to introduce legislation this year to require the Attorney General to report details of False Claims Act settlements to Congress.  "It's a matter of accountability," Grassley said.

 

Grassley is Ranking Member of the Judiciary Committee, with jurisdiction over the Justice Department and federal False Claims Act matters.  He is a senior member and former Chairman and Ranking Member of the Finance Committee, with jurisdiction over federal health care programs.

 

A summary of the Strengthening Program Integrity and Accountability in Health Care Act follows.

 

Video of Grassley's floor speech on the legislation is available here.

 

The bill text is available here.

 

Grassley's statement at today's Finance Committee hearing is available here.

 

 

The Strengthening Program Integrity and Accountability in Health Care Act of 2011

Summary of Provisions*

 

Sec. 1. Short Title; Table of Contents

Sec. 2. Enhanced Medicare and Medicaid Program Integrity Provisions

Payment Suspensions CMS and its contractors currently have the discretionary authority to withhold payment in whole or in part if there is reliable evidence of an overpayment or fraud. CMS regulations stipulate the procedures CMS and its contractors must follow when deciding to suspend payment. The provision would make this discretionary authority mandatory and require the Secretary to suspend payments to a provider or supplier pending a fraud investigation, except in cases when there is a determination that such a suspension is not supported by good cause.

Extension of Time to Pay Claims Under current law, payments must be made for clean claims within 14 to 30 days.  This is known as the "prompt payment rule."  The provision would require the Secretary to extend the time that Medicare payments must be made to providers if there is a determination of the likelihood of fraud, waste and abuse.  OIG would also have to make recommendations at least annually on what categories of providers would warrant an extension of the time period in the prompt payment rule, and CMS would have to respond to these recommendations.

 

Sec. 3. Requirements for the Transmission of Management Implication Reports by the HHS OIG

A Management Implication Report (MIR) is a document the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) produces identifying systematic weaknesses or vulnerabilities in federal programs to fraud, waste, or abuse, and recommending ways to correct or minimize them.  Often detected in the course of an investigation, these identified weaknesses can exceed the parameters of the investigation and represent fraud, waste, or abuse across the federal healthcare system.  This provision would require the OIG to inform Congress when it transmits MIRs to the Secretary and requires the Secretary to respond to OIG within 90 days.

 

Sec. 4. Medical ID Theft Information Sharing Program and Clearinghouse

Medical identity theft contributes to a significant portion of health care fraud.  This provision would require the Secretary to establish an information-sharing program with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which maintains identity theft complaints received by both the FTC and the Social Security Administration. The Secretary would be required to establish methods to identify and detect medical identity theft and establish responses to warning signs of medical identity theft.

Sec. 5. Permissive Exclusion from Federal Health Care Programs Expanded to Individuals and Entities Affiliated with Sanctioned Entities

HHS OIG has the authority to exclude health care providers from participation in Federal health care programs. Exclusions are mandatory under certain circumstances, and permissive in others (i.e., HHS OIG has discretion in whether to exclude an entity or individual). This provision would subject individuals who have had past ownership or control interests with sanctioned entities or past ownership or control interests with an affiliated entity of sanctioned entities to the OIG's permissive exclusion authority.  The provision would explicitly apply to MA, PDP, and Medicaid managed care plans as well as their participating providers and suppliers

 

Sec. 6. Public Availability of Medicare Claims Data

This provision would require the Secretary to issue regulations to make Medicare claims and payment data available to the public in accordance with privacy, security, and disclosure laws in a manner similar to other federal spending disclosed on www.USAspending.gov.

 

Sec. 7. Medicaid Exclusion from Participation Relating to Certain Ownership, Control, and Management Affiliations

Medicaid law requires states to exclude individuals or entities from Medicaid participation when a state is directed to do so by the Secretary, and to deny payment for any item or service furnished by the individual or entity. States are required to exclude these individuals and deny payment for a period specified by the Secretary.

 

The measure would require Medicaid agencies to exclude individuals or entities from Medicaid participation if the entity or individual owns, controls, or manages an entity that: (A) has unpaid or unreturned overpayments during the period as determined by the Secretary or the state; (B) is suspended, excluded, or terminated from participation in any Medicaid program; or (C) is affiliated with an individual or entity that has been suspended, excluded, or terminated from Medicaid participation during the period. This provision would be effective January 1, 2011.

 

Sec. 8. Payment for Illegal Unapproved Drugs

This provision would ensure that the Medicaid program does not provide reimbursement for covered outpatient drugs that are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under a new drug application (NDA), an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA), or drugs grandfathered under prior FDA determinations.  The Social Security Act currently prohibits the reimbursement of illegal, unapproved drugs which fall outside the definition of a "covered outpatient drug".  However, Medicaid continues to make payments for illegal, unapproved drugs.  For example, in 2008 it was reported that nearly $198 million were paid in reimbursements for unapproved drugs from 2004-2007.

 

This provision would prohibit a state from making a payment for any covered outpatient drug unless the state first verifies with the FDA that such a covered outpatient drug is being legally marketed.  It also would require the FDA to establish a public registry of all drugs that are not approved under an NDA or ANDA and include the drug, the person who listed the drug, and the authority that does not require the drug to receive approval via an NDA or ANDA.

 

Sec. 9. Requiring Individuals or Entities that Participate in or Conduct Activities under Federal Health Care Programs to Comply with Certain Congressional Requests

This provision would require individuals and entities that participate in federal health care programs to comply with requests for documents, information, or interviews by the chairmen or ranking members of committees of jurisdiction.

 

-30-

By U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley

 

The President's recent State of the Union address reminded me of a visit I made last summer to a start-up company in Jasper County. This award-winning lighting company illuminates how the U.S. patent system needs to keep up with the 21st century economy.

 

Prism Projection, Inc., headquartered in Sully, has 19 employees collaborating their talents in engineering, software, electronics, and manufacturing.  The company continues to innovate and grow as a pioneer in its field by designing eco-friendly, high-quality lighting solutions for the entertainment and architectural industries.

 

The founder of Prism Projection attributes a big part of its success to recent patent approvals that have allowed the rural-based company to "grow and continue hiring." His company exemplifies why it's so important to Main Street start-ups to make patent protection an economic priority and to improve the patent system so it is more workable and efficient.

The current U.S. patent system is mired in uncertainty, inefficiencies, and a morass of litigation. Creators of new technologies and products are left vulnerable to abusive lawsuits.  Too often inventors with good ideas are left hanging in the wind for investment capital while their patent applications are clogged in the system.  U.S. entrepreneurs, innovators and investors languish under a federal patent system that has not been significantly updated in more than 60 years.


The United States can't "out-innovate, out-educate and out-build" our competitors when America's best and brightest inventors are out-of-luck with a federal patent system woefully out-of-date (the U.S. Patent Office only recently began accepting the lion's share of its patent applications digitally) and out-of-touch (patent applicants can wait years for an initial ruling) with the way businesses are run in the global economy. Inefficiencies in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are undermining America's road to economic recovery, growth and job creation.


That's why I'm working to advance long overdue bipartisan patent reform legislation that would help put America's researchers, entrepreneurs, engineers and inventors back in the driver's seat.

The America Invents Act would protect inventors' rights and encourage innovation and investment in our economy.  The bill would improve transparency and third party participation in the patent application review process.  This, in turn, would strengthen patent quality and result in more fairness to both patent holders and patent challengers.  The bill would institute beneficial changes to the patent process to curb litigation abuses and improve certainty for investors and innovators.  It would also help companies do business more efficiently on an international basis.  And, finally, the bill would enhance operations of the Patent and Trademark Office with administrative reforms and give the office fee-setting authority to reduce backlogs and better manage its business.

The U.S. inventor widely credited for "inventing" the light bulb effectively "out-innovated" his competitors in the late 19th century through tireless scientific research and engineering. When the U.S. Patent Office granted patent 223,898 in January 1880, just two months after filing his application, Thomas Edison's incandescent light bulb would soon revolutionize electrical lighting in America.


The "Wizard of Menlo Park" and the wizards of Prism Projection, Inc. turned their bright ideas into patentable products and intellectual property that give consumers what they want. An effective, efficient patent system can help create jobs and prosperity for starts-ups on Main Street. Clearing up the backlog and making the patent system more accountable also will help make Iowa's manufacturing, agricultural and academic research giants, such as Rockwell Collins, Inc., Deere & Company and Pioneer Hi-Bred International, more competitive in the global economy.


Unleashing America's inventors, scientists, researchers and investors from a patent system that's stuck in the last century is key to our long-term prosperity.

Friday, March 4, 2011

WASHINGTON - Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Senator Chuck Grassley and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa today sent a letter requesting information from the former general counsel of the Securities and Exchange Commission on seemingly obvious, significant conflicts of interest in the Bernie Madoff fraud case.

"Given the anger that victims justifiably felt for the SEC's failure to catch Madoff sooner, it is difficult to understand how you and other SEC officials would not realize the strong appearance of impropriety created by your participation in Madoff matters after receiving proceeds from a Madoff account," Grassley and Issa wrote to former general counsel David Becker.

Grassley and Issa's letter follows their letter earlier in the week to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro on the case.

Based on a staff review of SEC documents and an interview of Becker, it appears Schapiro allowed Becker to advise and represent the SEC in the Madoff case without fully, properly examining the conflicts of interest presented by Becker's personal financial interest, among other concerns.

The text of the Grassley-Issa letter to Becker is available here.
Fights to create Iowa jobs, energize renewable fuels industry

Washington, DC - Today, Congressman Bruce Braley (IA-01) introduced a bill to end tax breaks for big oil companies. The Clean Energy Jobs Act will use the savings from these tax breaks to create jobs in Iowa, boost the renewable fuels industry and pay down the national deficit. Ending oil industry tax breaks will save about $43 billion over the next ten years.

"Big oil companies are making record profits and at the same time, they're collecting tax breaks from the government," said Rep. Braley. "If we end just a few of these tax breaks, we can create good-paying jobs in Iowa and still have funds left over to reduce our national deficit by billions."

The Clean Energy Jobs bill repeals oil industry tax breaks and extends ethanol and biodiesel tax credits through 2016. The current tax breaks for these renewable fuels expire at the end of 2011.

"For years, oil companies have raised prices at the pump, made Americans pay for their record profits and threatened American security by making us more dependent on foreign oil," said Rep. Braley. "But instead of investing in renewable fuels, Republicans are funneling taxpayer dollars right back into the pockets of big oil. This bill is a chance for Congress to break that cycle and do something responsible for our nation, while also creating good jobs in Iowa."  

###

As part of a continued digital focus at TAG Communications Inc. employee Brian Marshall has recently attained individual Google AdWords Certification.

To attain certification, individuals must pass a rigorous Google Advertising Fundamentals test, as well as passing one specific area of concentration. Marshall concentrated on Search Advertising, but plans on working towards completing the other two modules in Display Advertising and Reporting & Analysis.

Marshall says going through this process was challenging, but really helped him learn the value online advertising opportunities and the differences in existing approaches.

"A lot of people are swiftly becoming web experts, but it's difficult to document that expertise and we felt it was important to undertake a legitimate process that will allow our experiences to resonate in this market," Marshall said.

In his current position, Marshall handles Google AdWords campaigns, social media functionalities and researching emerging online marketing tools for TAG and the firm's base of clients. According to Google's online listings, the nearest partner firms outside of Chicago are in Rockford, Illinois and Omaha, Nebraska.

"We plan to continue our emphasis in digital and online markets, and Brian's professional accomplishment helps to validate the service we've already been giving our existing clients," said Mike Vondran, TAG Communications President & CEO.

Based in the Quad Cities, TAG Communications is a full service marketing services provider serving businesses in nearly every industry. Since its founding in 1990, The company has specialized in strategic analysis and creative solutions that achieve results via the staff's creative, responsive and cost-effective service to their clients throughout the nation.

####

Washington, DC - March 3, 2011 - Today, Congressman Bruce Braley (IA-01) voted to help small businesses by repealing the burdensome "1099" provision of the health care law, which was added by the Senate. The Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act, sponsored by Rep. Dan Lungren (R-CA) and co-sponsored by Rep. Braley, passed with a vote of 314 to 112 in the House today. Rep. Braley released the following statement:

"Small business owners need to focus on running their businesses and creating jobs - they don't need additional burdensome regulations," said Rep. Braley. "I've heard from business owners in my district in Iowa and they've told me that the 1099 provision increases the cost of doing business and puts an unfair burden on them. I'm glad the House took action today to repeal this provision and help small businesses in my state and across the country."

###

As the President said during his annual State of the Union address, America is a nation built on big ideas.

There's no doubt our culture embraces the concept that bigger is better. From portion sizes served at U.S. restaurants to the homes we live in and the cars we drive, Americans like to live large.

Considering America's expanding waistline and bulging budget deficits, bigger isn't always better. Washington can't seem to shake its cultural addiction to living high on the hog.

But more spending and more taxes are adding up to big problems. Consider the national debt. There's legitimate concern that by shouldering a $14 trillion-plus national debt, the federal government is on pace to overwhelm the credit market, squeezing access to affordable credit for the private sector and state/municipal borrowers. Servicing the national debt eats up scarce resources. Reckless federal spending is irresponsible and unsustainable. Washington cannot spend its way back to prosperity.

The voters sent a clear message to political leaders in November: Enough is enough.

But when the President in February unveiled his budget proposal, he squandered a big opportunity to lead. Ignoring a basic law of gravity that says "what goes up, must come down," the President sided with the gravitational pull of expediency.

Arguing his budget proposal uses a scalpel instead of a machete to address the federal deficit, the President disappointingly didn't embrace his own State of the Union message.

Instead of using the Presidential bully pulpit to build a national consensus regarding entitlement reform, the President's budget ignored the fundamental issue that will drive America year after year into ditch after ditch of deficits. If we don't change course, the whopping $14 trillion national debt will balloon to $26 trillion in the next decade.

Regrettably, the President effectively rejected months of collaboration produced by his own bipartisan deficit commission. It's little wonder why public cynicism grows when elected leaders punt issues to an appointed commission and then relegate its report to collect dust on the shelf.

In January the President called upon Congress and the American people to think big and make the 21st century America's best one yet. The American people can "out-innovate, out-educate and out-build" the best of the best, but the federal government needs to get out of the way.

Since the era of Manifest Destiny, when the promise of prosperity and the pursuit of happiness put fire in the bellies of pioneers, homesteaders, miners and missionaries, Americans have tested their mettle, employing brain and brawn, to create their fortunes and control their own destiny.

In the 21st century, technology and innovation have reshaped the economic landscape. Big thinkers in America have helped drive a digital revolution that has changed the way the world goes 'round, from commerce to communication to cultural and even political revolutions. Our entrepreneurs, inventors, engineers, scientists and investors are ready to seize their moment to achieve prosperity and live the American dream.

Washington needs to think big. Baby steps won't get us there in time. Washington can help "win the future" by taking giant steps that will address entitlements, curb federal spending, cut burdensome regulations and advance opportunity for the next generation.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Q.  Why is fighting fraud in Medicare and Medicaid important?

A.  The federal debt has ballooned to a record $14 trillion, and the deficit this year alone will be $1.3 trillion.  Congress is currently debating whether it will make budget cuts in a short-term funding bill needed to continue federal programs for the remainder of the fiscal year.  Tough decisions need to be made, and cuts will impact many Americans.  Medicare and Medicaid spending is one of the largest expenditures in the federal budget.  Every dollar lost to fraud shortchanges taxpayers and the beneficiaries who rely on the health care programs.

Q. What's the scope of Medicare and Medicaid fraud?

A.  The best estimates are that between five and eight percent of the money spent on Medicare and Medicaid is lost to fraud every year.  The federal government spent $502 billion on Medicare and $379 billion on Medicaid in fiscal 2009.  So, it is estimated between $40 billion and $70 billion was lost to fraud that year.

Q.  What has been done to curb this fraud?

A.  The federal False Claims Act is one of the most effective tools against health care fraud.  I authored a major update of this law, in 1986, with Rep. Howard Berman of California.  Since then, it has recovered more than $28 billion and deterred billions of dollars in additional fraud against the taxpayers.  The qui tam whistleblower provisions that were created by our 1986 update are among the most successful elements of the False Claims Act.  These provisions allow average citizens who learn about fraud to report it and file suit to recover tax dollars that have been lost to fraud.  This year, the False Claims Act brought in $3 billion in recoveries, with $2.5 billion from health care fraud cases, and nearly $2.4 billion of the recoveries thanks to the qui tam whistleblowers provisions.  I've worked repeatedly to fortify and protect this statute.  It's effective and, as a result, there are constant attempts to weaken or even gut the law.

This civil recovery of public dollars that otherwise would be lost to fraud is a great victory in the fight against fraud.  It ought to be buttressed by a robust criminal prosecution.  That effort is falling short.  At the end of last year, I asked the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to account for the falling number of criminal prosecutions.  Administration leaders promote the value of a special fraud prevention and enforcement task force known as HEAT.  That stands for the Health Care Fraud Prevention & Enforcement Action Team.  The new health care law dedicates additional federal dollars to HEAT and related efforts.  In fiscal 2009, there were a record number of criminal health care fraud defendants, but the conviction rate for health care violations is flat, resulting in a falling conviction rate.  Of the 803 criminal defendants charged that year, only 583 were convicted or plea bargained.  That's a 72 percent conviction rate compared to past rates that topped 90 percent.  It looks like things are improving since fiscal 2009, but continued oversight of the Justice Department is needed.  To strengthen the ability of government watchdogs to see what's actually happening with tax dollars directed to anti-fraud efforts, more information should be included in publicly available Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account reports each year.  For example, 75 percent of the discretionary dollars that Congress has directed to HEAT, goes to the Department of Health and Human Services for vague initiatives labeled oversight.  There should be accountability as to how exactly this money is used to achieve criminal prosecutions.

I also want to make certain that qui tam settlements do justice to taxpayers.  They never should be just a cost of doing business for corporations and contractors who were engaged in fraud.  The Justice Department is reluctant to share details of settlements reached under the False Claims Act, despite the taxpayer interest in making this information transparent.  So, I will introduce legislation this year to require the Attorney General to report each year details about the settlements to Congress.  Again, it's a matter of accountability.

Q.  What can be done to prevent fraud in the first place?

A.  I also plan to re-introduce my comprehensive bill to protect health care dollars.  The bill is a package of common sense initiatives to fight fraud, waste and abuse in taxpayer-sponsored health care programs.  As spending on these programs continues to grow, Congress should act quickly to pass these reforms.  A major component of this reform effort of mine would give the government more time to evaluate the legitimacy of Medicare providers before payment is required when there's suspicion of foul play.  Without this change, we're left with a pay-and-chase situation that only enables fraud against the taxpayers.  My legislation would help program officials better detect fraud with new disclosure requirements.  It would enhance coordination among federal agencies responsible for fighting fraud.  And it would make penalties tougher and apply them more broadly than they are today.

Budget Would Damage Food, Agriculture, and Farm Conservation Initiatives Critical to Iowa

Date:     February 25, 2011

Late last week the U.S. House of Representatives passed budget legislation covering the remainder of fiscal year 2011 and making severe cuts in funding to address a broad range of our nation's critically important priorities and needs in the areas of food, agriculture, and farm conservation.  If enacted, this budgetary onslaught would seriously impair efforts to improve the quality of life in rural communities; to ensure safe food for American consumers; to conserve soil, enhance water quality, restore wildlife habitat; and to spur economic growth and create jobs.  The budget proposal passed by the House is thus especially detrimental to Iowa.

"Without a doubt, the time has come for making and enacting tough budget decisions through a balanced, careful, and thoughtful approach encompassing both spending and revenue levels while not shortchanging the essential needs of Americans or our nation's future," said Harkin.  "But those decisions must not at the expense of Iowa's farmers and rural communities."

Some of the more significant and damaging consequences facing Iowa if the House-passed budget bill were to become law include :

Resource Conservation and Development (RC&D) Councils:  The House bill would eliminate funding for the RC&D program, which assists rural communities in boosting economic opportunity and creating and retaining jobs while protecting and conserving natural resources and improving the quality of life in rural communities.  Zeroing out $50.3 million in RC&D funding, as the House proposes, would withdraw support for 375 local RC&D councils across the nation.  In Iowa, the 17 RC&D councils spanning the state would lose their entire $1.9 million in federal assistance, as compared to fiscal 2010.  For a map of those locations, please click here.

Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP):  EQIP provides assistance, in the form of cost-share and incentive payments, to help producers of crops, livestock, dairy, and poultry meet their environmental challenges and requirements.  The House bill would reduce fiscal 2011 funding for EQIP by $350 million (22 percent) below the amount dedicated to EQIP in the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act (2008 farm bill).  Based on Iowa's share of national EQIP funding in fiscal 2010, the cut proposed by the House would deprive Iowa farmers some $7.3 million in EQIP funding that had been committed in the 2008 farm bill.

Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP):  This voluntary program compensates landowners for protecting, restoring, and enhancing wetlands.  Under the House budget bill, WRP funding would be cut by $119 million in fiscal 2011, a reduction of 22 percent from the funds dedicated to WRP in the 2008 farm bill and otherwise available this year.  According to Iowa's typical share of total WRP funds, the House action would deny $3.1 million to Iowa landowners for wetlands conservation.

Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP):  The House bill, by reducing CSP funds by some $39 million below the farm bill's level for fiscal 2011, would cut CSP assistance to Iowa farmers by $2.7 million.

Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations:  Funding through this program for preventing flooding, conserving soil, and managing natural resources in watersheds would be eliminated in the House budget bill.  In fiscal 2010, Iowa received over $2 million in such watershed and flood prevention funding, but would receive none if the House bill were enacted.

Food and Agriculture Research:  Such research carried out at federal facilities of USDA's Agricultural Research Service (ARS) would be cut in the House bill by nearly 10 percent ($114 million) compared to fiscal 2010, thereby reducing by some $5.0 million the amount of ARS funding in Iowa for research covering topics such as crop and animal production, food safety, and natural resources and sustainable agriculture systems.  The legislation would also cut by about 16 percent ($217 million), as compared to fiscal 2010, the funding for grants by USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) supporting food and agriculture research, education, and extension at land grant institutions, such as Iowa State University, and similar entities.  Iowa would thus receive some $5.3 million less through NIFA this year as compared to fiscal 2010 if the House budget proposal were enacted.

Department of Agriculture Meat and Poultry Inspection:  Despite repeated incidents showing the need to strengthen federal food safety protections, the House bill would carve some 10 percent off the level of funding Congress adopted for last year and had tentatively approved for fiscal 2011.  Reducing food safety funding would risk the safety of American consumers as well as the ability of Iowa's meat processing plants to operate at full capacity.

Harkin's full statement on the budget proposals before Congress can be found here.

Pages