Democrats have been privately grumbling for a while now that Governor Bruce Rauner isn’t truly interested in good-faith negotiations on a balanced budget with economic reforms to end the two-and-a-half-year Statehouse stalemate.

But Senate President John Cullerton spent days and days negotiating the details of a four-year property-tax freeze with Rauner, only to have his spokesperson tell me last week that he hadn’t acceded to Rauner’s demand for a four-year freeze. So Rauner isn’t the only one to blame.

In this business, you only negotiate on a bill you flatly oppose if you’re trying to run out the clock. Otherwise, you just kill it. And because of this, people in the governor’s office are saying they don’t think that Cullerton really wants a deal.

Rauner moved off his demand for a five-year freeze. The two men then discussed side issues, such as the timeline and the process for locally opting out of the freeze or for making it permanent. The governor wanted a statewide vote, but Cullerton wanted local votes and appeared to prevail. But Rauner would only agree to limited exemptions from the freeze, bond payments being one of them. Cullerton wanted more exemptions, pension payments being one of those.

Then last week, Cullerton attempted to move legislation with language identical to that of a bill Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno introduced in January. It failed because it required a three-fifths vote to freeze taxes on local home-rule governments. Cullerton said afterward that he may strip out the home-rule provision and run it again – which would, of course, mean that the City of Chicago would be exempt.

Without a property-tax freeze amenable to the governor, I just don’t know how this impasse gets resolved.

Illinois has some of the highest property taxes in the country. So if the negotiations fall apart, the Senate Democrats’ refusal to pass a “real” freeze will be a political gift for Rauner.

The issue also comes neatly wrapped in the governor’s favorite bow: House Speaker Michael Madigan. The speaker is, of course, a property-tax appeals lawyer. Rauner said the other day for the umpteenth time that Madigan’s legal work was a clear case of conflict of interest and is evidence of how corrupt the state is. Cullerton has also done some property-tax appeals work, so Rauner can easily lump him in with Madigan on the conflict of interest and corruption stuff.

And then there was last week’s biggest political news. Billionaire Democratic gubernatorial candidate J.B. Pritzker was thrashed in the media for obtaining huge property-tax-assessment rebates and reductions for an empty and “uninhabitable” mansion next to his own Chicago palace. The mansion apparently became even more legally uninhabitable after Pritzker had the house’s toilets uninstalled. That was clearly the work of a too-clever-by-half property-tax attorney, whom Pritzker may want to think about throwing under the nearest bus if this publicity gets any worse. And, despite firm denials, it’s pretty clear that Madigan is backing Pritzker.

Even a child could frame this issue for Rauner. Take a universally and intensely unpopular property-tax system, combine it with the state’s most wildly unpopular politician (Madigan), and use all that to blame the Senate Democrats for killing the grand bargain and, in the process, throw lots more mud on their “frontrunner” gubernatorial candidate.

It’s the worst possible hill the Democrats could choose to die on. Yes, the Senate president has legitimate policy concerns about the property-tax freeze. But this is a political no-brainer.

The best idea I heard last week was to take this issue away from Rauner and Cullerton and allow Senators from both sides of the aisle to negotiate it. Doing that very thing seemed to help move the revenue/budget talks and workers’ compensation reform forward, even though they’re not wrapped up as I write this.

If, as the Republicans privately contend, Cullerton’s goal is to deprive Rauner of a clear “win” on a property-tax freeze, then nothing will work. The one thing we do know is that taking the issue away from Rauner and Cullerton couldn’t possibly make things worse.

Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax (a daily political newsletter) and

Support the River Cities' Reader

Get 12 Reader issues mailed monthly for $48/year.

Old School Subscription for Your Support

Get the printed Reader edition mailed to you (or anyone you want) first-class for 12 months for $48.
$24 goes to postage and handling, $24 goes to keeping the doors open!

Click this link to Old School Subscribe now.

Help Keep the Reader Alive and Free Since '93!


"We're the River Cities' Reader, and we've kept the Quad Cities' only independently owned newspaper alive and free since 1993.

So please help the Reader keep going with your one-time, monthly, or annual support. With your financial support the Reader can continue providing uncensored, non-scripted, and independent journalism alongside the Quad Cities' area's most comprehensive cultural coverage." - Todd McGreevy, Publisher