MOLINE, ILLINOIS - WQPT, Quad Cities PBS will air a holiday special Monday, December 5th at 7:00 pm featuring local gospel singers The Westbrook Singers.  The concert is the first in a series of programs supported by a grant from the Illinois Arts Council that will highlight Illinois artists.  The program will also air on December 8 at 9 pm and Christmas Day at 2:30 pm.

 

"Earlier this year the Illinois Arts Council called to offer WQPT the opportunity to create a television series that focused on artists who work out of the State of Illinois. We had been hoping to create a series like this for some time, but this grant made the dream possible," said WQPT General Manager, Rick Best.

 

The series titled "Artists in Profile" is set to begin airing in early 2012 and will include three specials. The first one "A Westbrook Singers Christmas" and a second Westbrook gospel concert scheduled for March along with a concert by the Bucktown Revue. In addition there will be 10 half hour programs. "So far we have interviewed 10 artists of every kind and taped the three specials" said WQPT producer, Lora Adams.  "Our idea was to talk about how artists are inspired and educated," Adams said adding "WQPT had been trying for several years to find the funding to capture the remarkable voices of the Westbrook Singers and now we have." The Westbrook Singers website calls them "An extraordinary group - brother & sisters - dedicated to the spread of Gospel music in a style that is both contemporary and traditional."

 

All of the concerts were taped over a three day period at Fusion Communications.  "We were so fortunate to have had Capri College come in and provide hair and make-up services to the casts and to Foster Family Music who lent us a really gorgeous piano," said Adams.  Lighting for the concerts was designed by Butch Bos and Jeff Lyle and audio recording was done by Lars Rehnberg. Camera operators were Adam Less, Cody Lambert, Todd Steffens, Chris Ryder and Mike Lambert.  "We hope people will tune in and enjoy the concert" said Best.

 

WQPT is a media service of Western Illinois University located in Moline, Illinois.

 

# # #

Paul is steadily on the rise as his Republican
competitors continue to flash and falter
LAKE JACKSON, Texas - 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul polls a strong second place in a new poll commissioned by the influential Des Moines Register newspaper, revealing that the 12-term Congressman from Texas has steadily grown his support base in the first-in-nation voting state.

Paul garnered 18 percent among likely Republican caucus goers, close behind Newt Gingrich who earned 25 percent. With 16 percent of the vote, Mitt Romney was the only other candidate to attract double-digit support.  Especially noteworthy is that Paul, with respect to Iowa poll results, has steadily gone from low, to middling to top-place showings.

"The rise of Congressman Paul's poll numbers reflects our hopes for strong, steady growth minus the media- and pundit-influenced volatility other candidates suffer.  We want to continue growing our support base incrementally and maintain the faith and trust voters put in us as they carry us toward a respectable caucus finish," said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton.

"The Iowa team is plugging away using traditional retail politicking but we're buoyed by unconventional interest in, and support for, Ron Paul.  We take today's poll news as a compliment but we do not take it lightly, as we're working hard in the weeks leading up to the caucus," added Drew Ivers, Iowa chairman for the Ron Paul 2012 Presidential campaign.

The Des Moines Register poll was conducted from November 27th to the 30th and is based on interviews with 2,222 registered Republican and independent voters in Iowa ages 18 or older, of which 401 are likely caucus goers.  Questions asked of the 401 likely Republican caucus goers have a margin of error of +/- 4.9 percent.  Other results based on smaller samples have a wider margin of error.  Poll results are as follows:

Gingrich 25%
Paul 18%
Romney 16%
Bachmann 8%
Cain 8%
Perry 6%
Santorum 6%
Huntsman 2%

More detailed poll results will be released tomorrow, Sunday, December 4th, sometime in the morning.

###
Mr. Cain brought energy, enthusiasm to process
LAKE JACKSON, Texas - 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul released the following statement concerning Herman Cain's suspension of his campaign for the presidency.  Below please find brief comments from Congressman Paul:

"Herman Cain brought energy and enthusiasm to the Republican nominating process, as well as a unique perspective on many domestic issues important to voters such as tax code reform and a pro-growth agenda favorable to the private sector. 

"In light of his suspension of campaign activities, I want to wish Herman success in his future endeavors."

###
Machine Shed Restaurant offers a free "Holiday's in the Heartland" ebook:  A holiday guide that includes gift ideas, demonstrations and favorite recipes

The Machine Shed restaurant is sharing some of their best advice for creating an effortless and memorable holiday season with a complimentary "Holidays in the Heartland" ebook available on their website or Facebook page.

The ebook includes:
• Delicious Gift ideas for your gift exchange
• A demonstration on how to repurpose a wreath
• A downloadable holiday meal planner
• Three favorite holiday recipes - which includes the recipe for the Shed's famous
cinnamon rolls.

Information found in the ebook was created, sourced and shared by the Machine Shed chefs and staff.

To receive a complimentary copy, "Like" the Machine Shed on Facebook at www.facebook.com/MachineShedRestaurant or visit the website at www.machineshed.com

###
Trump's participation will contribute to circus-like
atmosphere and is odd considering his slight to RPI
ANKENY, Iowa - The Ron Paul 2012 Presidential campaign released the following statement concerning the selection of Donald Trump as moderator for the December 27th Republican debate to be held in Iowa.  Below please find comments from Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton:

"The Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Committee rejects the selection of Donald Trump as moderator for the Republican presidential debate to be held on December 27th in Iowa. 

"We have conferred with our Iowa campaign chairman Drew Ivers and vice-chairmen David Fischer and A.J. Spiker who are all RPI State Central Committee Members, and they concur with this decision.

"The selection of a reality television personality to host a presidential debate that voters nationwide will be watching is beneath the office of the Presidency and flies in the face of that office's history and dignity.  Mr. Trump's participation as moderator will distract from questions and answers concerning important issues such as the national economy, crushing federal government debt, the role of the federal government, foreign policy, and the like.  To be sure, Mr. Trump's participation will contribute to an unwanted circus-like atmosphere.

"Mr. Trump's selection is also wildly inappropriate because of his record of toying with the serious decision of whether to compete for our nation's highest office, a decision he appeared to make frivolously.  The short-lived elevation of Mr. Trump's stature as a candidate put him on the radar of many organizations and we recall that last spring he was invited to keynote the Republican Party of Iowa's annual Reagan Dinner, yet at the last minute he left RPI holding the bag by canceling.  In turn, RPI canceled its biggest fundraising gala of the year and suffered embarrassment and in addition RPI was required to engage in refunding measures.  Our candidate will not even consider participating in the late-December debate until Mr. Trump publicly apologizes to Iowa party leaders and rectifies in full the situation.

"Therefore our candidate Ron Paul, the champion of the Constitution, has advised he will not attend."

###
MOLINE, ILLINOIS - On Thanksgiving night 2010 WQPT premiered a brand new public affairs program called "The Cities with Jim Mertens." This Thanksgiving the program celebrates one year on the air. Producer Lora Adams said "We've interviewed more than 100 guests, everyone from Governor Branstad to original Freedom Rider, Diane Nash. Plus, we've been able to introduce our audiences to variety of local musicians and artists."

Host Jim Mertens had wanted for some time to do a longer format public affairs program. "I have the best of both worlds," Mertens said referring to his job as morning anchor at WQAD and his hosting duties for WQPT. "We've had the opportunity to talk with folks about the most up-to-the minute topics. From the flooding on the Mississippi to a couple who were caught in the civil unrest in Egypt to most recently, discussing the construction projects taking place in downtown Moline. We're also really excited that the Victor and Doris Day Foundation,
who were the original funders for the program, have once again provided funding for a second year" Mertens said.

"The Cities" is taped at Fusion Communications in Davenport, Iowa and airs on Thursdays at 6:30 pm and Sundays at 5:30 pm. WQPT is a media service of Western Illinois University, located in Moline, Illinois.

###

SCAD: The University for Creative Careers

The Savannah College of Art and Design is a private, nonprofit, accredited institution conferring bachelor's and master's degrees at distinctive locations and online to prepare talented students for professional careers. SCAD offers degrees in more than 40 areas of study, as well as minors in nearly 60 disciplines in Savannah and Atlanta, Georgia; in Hong Kong; in Lacoste, France; and online through SCAD eLearning.

SCAD has more than 20,000 alumni and offers an exceptional education and unparalleled career preparation. The diverse student body, consisting of more than 11,000 students, comes from all 50 United States and more than 100 countries worldwide. Each student is nurtured and motivated by a faculty of more than 700 professors with extraordinary academic credentials and valuable professional experience. These professors emphasize learning through individual attention in an inspiring university environment. SCAD's innovative curriculum is enhanced by advanced, professional-level technology, equipment and learning resources and has garnered acclaim from respected organizations and publications, including 3D World, American Institute of Architects, BusinessWeek, DesignIntelligence, U.S. News & World Report and the Los Angeles Times.

For more information, visit scad.edu.

In case you missed it from the Washington Post...

"When people talk about government red tape, first, it's because of the incomprehensible gobbledygook that's used to write many of these federal regulations," says Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), the House's point man for plainspeak. "The average user can't understand their responsibilities unless they hire lawyers and accountants to figure it out."

Pushing the government to speak plainly

The Washington Post

By Suzy Khimm

Friday December 2nd, 2011

If you want to understand Americans' frustration with Washington, you might start with the very words the government uses to communicate with them.

Take the Labor Department's explanation of health insurance subsidies for laid-off workers under the 2009 stimulus legislation:

A collection of cartoons on the debate.

"Generally, the maximum period of continuation coverage is measured from the date of the original qualifying event (for Federal COBRA, this is generally 18 months). However, ARRA, as amended, provides that the 15 month premium reduction period begins on the first day of the first period of coverage for which an individual is 'assistance eligible.' This is of particular importance to individuals who experience an involuntary termination following a reduction of hours. Only individuals who have additional periods of COBRA (or state continuation) coverage remaining after they become assistance eligible are entitled to the premium reduction."

What does that mean? Well, essentially, it explains that certain laid-off or downsized workers can get special subsidies for 15 months after they lose their employer-sponsored health coverage.

It is complicated information to have to absorb. But does it have to be so complex to read?

The anti-jargon warriors don't think so. Fed up with such gibberish, a small but growing band of civil servants, lawmakers and consultants is leading the charge against bureaucratic legalese. Their mission isn't just to cut down on government forms in triplicate. They believe that Washington is dysfunctional on a more basic level and that to fix the government, the public needs to understand what the government is telling them.

It's a movement that's deeply populist in spirit, with its aim to bring the government closer to the people. And activists across ideological lines have echoed the same cause: The Occupy Wall Street crowd rails against deliberately impenetrable credit-card billing practices; tea partyers find evils lurking behind every run-on sentence in regulatory reform bills.

Ultimately, proponents believe that they're protecting the sanctity not only of the English language, but also of the republic itself. "How can you trust anyone if you don't understand what they're saying?" says Annetta Cheek, a 25-year veteran of the federal government who now runs a nonprofit called the Center for Plain Language. "When you're supposed to be a democracy, and people don't even understand what government is doing, that's a problem."

Plain-language advocates acknowledge that slaying jargon within the federal bureaucracy often seems impossible. But their ranks are growing in Washington, and officials loyal to the cause are embedded in the highest levels of all three branches of government.

"When people talk about government red tape, first, it's because of the incomprehensible gobbledygook that's used to write many of these federal regulations," says Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), the House's point man for plainspeak. "The average user can't understand their responsibilities unless they hire lawyers and accountants to figure it out."

Such complaints have made their way to the White House. "We hear from small businesses in particular that any government documents are too unruly and long," says Cass Sunstein, head of President Obama's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. "It does breed a kind of frustration that really isn't good for anybody."

Under the Obama administration, this populist push to keep legalese from getting between the government and the people has gained ground. In late 2010, Obama signed the Plain Writing Act, which mandates that all publicly available government documents be written in a "clear, concise" manner, requiring all agencies to push new writing standards.

The law neatly converges with Obama's pledge to create a more open, transparent government, Sunstein says. But it also builds on a long-standing battle against jargon in Washington. People have been railing against bureaucratic legalese for half a century. But as the government's responsibilities have grown, so have its rules and regulations ? plus all the exceptions and carve-outs that interest groups have lobbied to include. Ensuring that all these provisions are technically and legally correct means that it's often easier for the government to produce documents that are complicated, and hard for the public to understand, than ones that are simple.

According to the federal government's primer on plain language, PlainLanguage.gov, the father of the movement was John O'Hayre, an employee of the Bureau of Land Management, who resolved that convoluted prose had made government documents impossible to read. O'Hayre's 1966 book, "Gobbledygook Has Gotta Go," helped launch the movement. A few years later, President Richard Nixon required the Federal Register to be written in "layman's terms" rather than government-ese, followed by an executive order from President Jimmy Carter that told federal agencies to solicit information "in a simple, straightforward fashion." Though President Reagan revoked Carter's order, President Bill Clinton issued an executive order in 1998 requiring all federal employees to use short sentences, the active voice and "common, everyday words."

But such executive actions haven't been enough to stem the tide of bureaucratic jargon. Even the 2010 Plain Writing Act has no penalties for unplain writing, and the federal government has yet to appoint its own editor in chief to monitor the agencies' efforts.

Connecting good governance with plain language has been a long struggle. In his famous 1946 essay, "Politics and the English Language," George Orwell argued that government's "lifeless, imitative style" produced groupthink. "In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing," Orwell wrote. "One can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal end. If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy. .?.?. Never use a long word where a short one will do."

But it's been no simple task to convince the entire federal bureaucracy to follow Orwell's edict, let alone Obama's. Left to their own devices, agencies have a tendency to develop inscrutably dense vocabularies. "Smart people with great educations feel they have to demonstrate that they know what they're doing by writing in complex, impossible-to-understand language with lots of clauses and subparagraphs," Braley says.

He singles out a certain class of bureaucrats as the movement's most stubborn foe: lawyers. "Anything that grew out of legal training that has 'wherefores,' 'hereinafter,' 'party of the first part, party of the second part,' 'as referenced in subclauses A, B and C' ? those types of things are impossible to follow," says Braley, himself a lawyer.

Often, Cheek says, it's possible to use plain language in such documents without diluting or diminishing their legal meaning. "It's a very common excuse," she explains. "Some people try to tell you that it's dumbing down."

A few departments and agencies have taken the early lead in the war against bureaucrat-speak. Veterans Affairs, for instance, began a massive effort to rewrite its benefits rules in the early 2000s after an internal review ? and more than a dozen court decisions ? cited the need to clarify its confusing, ponderous government writing style, as two officials wrote in a 2004 report. The VA's Regulation Rewrite Project has taken years, but preliminary feedback has been positive: After recasting one benefits form in plain language, the response rate to that form rose from 35 percent to more than 55 percent, saving the agency $8 million every time it mailed the letter out.

Convincing the rest of the government to follow suit may seem like its own bureaucratic nightmare: Every agency must appoint plain-language "officers," post guides and issue reports to comply with the 2010 act.

One agency that has openly embraced the movement is among the most loathed institutions in Washington: the Internal Revenue Service. This year, the IRS won the Center for Plain Language's top prize for intelligible writing in public life, the 2011 ClearMark Award.

Receiving the award in late May, Jodi Patterson, who runs the IRS office for taxpayer correspondence, gave a speech that distilled the essence of the plain-language movement. "They might not like hearing from us. They may not want to hear from us," she said. "But at least they'll understand what it is we want them to do."

Advisory for Iowa Reporters and Editors

Friday, December 2, 2011

During his weekly video address, Senator Chuck Grassley discusses an amendment he cosponsored to give the National Guard a seat at the table when major decisions are made, including how Defense Department resources are allocated. During the debate to authorize Pentagon spending, Senator Grassley also cosponsored an amendment to the defense authorization bill to contain runaway spending on direct contractor salary reimbursements.

 

Click here for audio.

Here is the text of the address:

As part of a bill debated this week to authorize Pentagon spending, the Senate approved an amendment I cosponsored to give the National Guard a seat at the table when major decisions are made, including how Defense Department resources are allocated.

I'm a member of the National Guard Caucus in the Senate, and this amendment will build on reforms achieved in 2008.  The total force concept adopted by the Defense Department in 1970 made the Guard and Reserves integral to any extended campaign by U.S. forces, but the culture at the Pentagon has been slow to adopt the reality.

Last year, Iowa was ranked 15th in the nation for the percentage of our population serving in the National Guard.  Recently, we welcomed home the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 34th Infantry Division, which had more than 2,800 soldiers serving on combat duty in Afghanistan.  It was the largest single unit deployment of the Iowa National Guard since World War II.  It's time to give the Guard and Reserves support that's on par with that dedicated to active forces.

I cosponsored another amendment to the defense authorization bill to contain runaway spending on contractor salary reimbursements.  A large portion of government contracts actually reimburse the contractors directly for costs, including the salaries of their employees.  These cost-reimbursement type contracts are used extensively by the Defense Department.  The amendment I introduced with Senator Barbara Boxer of California limits unreasonable expenditures under these types of contracts.  We can't afford to waste increasingly limited defense dollars.

-30-

Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing with Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer Questions for the Record received December 2, 2011 and letter from Attorney General Eric Holder, October 7, 2011

The February 4th Response - The Justice Department can't have it both ways

  • Attorney General Holder letter to Senator Grassley, Congressman Issa, October 7, 2011: "Senator Grassley has suggested that I was aware of Operation Fast and Furious from letters he provided to me on or about January 31, 2011 that were addressed to the former Acting Director of ATF.  However, those letters referred only to an ATF umbrella initiative on the Southwest Border that started under the prior Administration -- Project Gunrunner -- and not to Operation Fast and Furious."
  • Senator Grassley: "Did your Deputy Assistant Attorney General (DAAG) Jason Weinstein review the Department's February 4, 2011 letter to me?"

Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, December 2, 2011: "Yes, DAAG Weinstein reviewed the letter; he also participated in its drafting."

"Based on the documents being produced by the Justice Department, I understand that two emails attaching drafts of the letter were sent to me by DAAG Weinstein on February 2, while I was in Mexico (February 1-3), and that I forwarded one of those emails to my personal email account on that day; I also understand that on February 4, after I had returned from Mexico, I received two emails attaching signed versions of the letter, including the final version, and that on February 5, I forwarded both emails to my personal email account. However, as I testified, I cannot say for sure whether I saw a draft of the letter before it was sent to you."

FACT

The letter which Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein participated in drafting, and which Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer was sent drafts of, stated: "ATF makes every effort to interdict weapons that have been purchased illegally and prevent their transportation to Mexico."  Weinstein knew this was clearly false because he knew about gunwalking in Operation Wide Receiver, which he brought to Breuer's attention in April 2010.  Had Breuer read this letter (he is unclear if he read it), he would have known this sentence was false as well.

Like Senator Grassley's January 27 letter, the Justice Department's February 4 letter applied to all of Project Gunrunner, of which both Operation Wide Receiver and Operation Fast and Furious were a part.  The Attorney General can't simultaneously claim that Senator Grassley's January 27 letter was too broad for him to be aware that Grassley was talking about of Fast and Furious but that their response was so narrow as to only apply to Fast and Furious, which is never specifically named in the Justice Department's February 4 letter.

Documents supporting the FACTS.

Pages