WASHINGTON - Senator Chuck Grassley joined Senator Jon Tester to introduce legislation to help lessen the impact of a federal court ruling (Kaplan v. Conyers) that would have a chilling effect on whistleblowers who help root out waste, fraud and abuse from within the federal government.

In Kaplan v. Conyers, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed employment positions which are determined to be "sensitive" to national security or "non-critical sensitive" to national security, which means someone holding the position could have a negative effect on national security.  The legislation seeks to rectify a part of Conyers by ensuring federal employees who have their positions deemed "sensitive" or "non-critical sensitive" are eligible to appeal the decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board.  The Board hears appeals from civil service employees regarding merit system employment actions.

Grassley said that without the ability to appeal a decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board, potential whistleblowers throughout the federal government will likely think twice about reporting wrongdoing.  He said even if a federal employee's current position is not considered sensitive, the court's ruling may make an employee who blows the whistle fear that his or her position may be designated non-critical sensitive as a means of retaliation.

Grassley initially wrote President Obama on September 4, 2013 asking him to clarify protections for federal whistleblowers after the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision.  The White House has not responded to Grassley's letter.

"The Federal Circuit has historically been unsympathetic to whistleblowers, but the Conyers ruling is over the top.  It's essentially a death knell to whistleblowers who are simply trying to help root out waste, fraud and abuse," Grassley said.  "This legislation can help give whistleblowers assurances that their case will at least be heard by an independent board."

A long-time advocate for whistleblowers, in addition to co-authoring the 1989 whistleblower law designed to protect federal whistleblowers, Grassley authored changes made in 1986 to the President Lincoln-era federal False Claims Act to empower private-sector whistleblowers.  Since the 1986 amendments were signed into law, the False Claims Act has brought back more than $30 billion to the federal treasury, and has deterred even more fraudulent activity. In 2009, in coordination with Senator Patrick Leahy, Grassley worked to pass legislation to shore up whistleblower protections in the False Claims Act that had been eroded by the courts after years of litigation by defense and healthcare contractors.

-30-

Local residents may recycle holiday lights, greeting cards, packaging and more

DAVENPORT, IA?Household waste in the United States increases by more than 25 percent between Thanksgiving and New Year's Day, creating an extra one million tons of garbage each week. The good news? Locally, much of this waste may be recycled!

Scott County residents may recycle many holiday items through curbside and drop-off recycling programs. Items that may be recycled include boxes from electronics, toys, shoes and shirts; wrapping paper tubes; gift/shopping bags made of paper; tissue paper; greeting cards and envelopes (even photo cards); newspapers, advertisements, magazines and catalogs; #1 and #2 plastics; glass food and beverage containers; steel cans; popcorn and cookie tins; and aluminum cans and pie plates.

Strands of holiday lights also are being accepted. These lights?along with computers, monitors, televisions, printers, digital cameras and video game systems?are considered electronic waste, or e-waste. These items may be dropped off for recycling from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Electronic Demanufacturing Facility, 1048 East 59th St., Davenport. There is no charge to residents from Scott and Rock Island counties. However, fees apply for e-waste from businesses. Call (563) 823-0119 for more information.

The cities of Bettendorf and Davenport collect large e-waste items (but not holiday lights) at the curb from residents on their bulky waste/recycling days and deliver them to the Electronic Demanufacturing Facility for recycling.

Residents should be aware that not all holiday waste may be recycled. Items such as wrapping paper, bows, ribbons, Styrofoam, plastic film and artificial Christmas trees are considered contaminants to the recycling process and should not be placed in curbside or drop-off recycling containers.

For more information about holiday recycling, call (563) 381-1300 or visit www.wastecom.com.

# # #
WASHINGTON, DC - In an effort to protect investors and the integrity of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) BrokerCheck program, U.S. Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) today sent a bipartisan letter asking FINRA to clarify and strengthen standards for expungement of investor complaints against brokers.
Citing a recent Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association (PIABA) study, which found that FINRA arbitrators granted expungement relief in 96.9% of cases from May 2009 through December 2011, the U.S. Senators said they are concerned about the number of times investor complaints may be expunged, or removed, from publicly available broker records maintained by FINRA via BrokerCheck.
The Senators wrote: "We share FINRA's view that 'expungement is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted only under appropriate circumstances,' and that it should be permitted 'only when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value.' However, we believe that meaningful investor protection includes the disclosure of whether a customer dispute was settled.   Not just for transparency sake, but also to help prospective investors make informed decisions about which individuals or firms with whom to do business."
In an effort to determine if the high percentage of expungements are warranted, the Senators asked FINRA to publicly detail the number of instances in which FINRA has questioned or challenged the provision of expungement relief and provide a detailed description of the circumstances of each case.  The Senators also asked FINRA to respond to the recommended changes cited in the PIABA study and explain whether FINRA intends to adopt each recommendation.
Full text of the letter follows (PDF attached):
December 16, 2013
Mr. Richard G. Ketchum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
1735 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Dear Mr. Ketchum:
Given our interest in improving transparency of our financial markets, we are writing in response to a recent Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association (PIABA) study, which raises concerns about the number of times investor complaints may be expunged, or removed, from publicly available broker records maintained by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
FINRA provides information to investors through BrokerCheck, which FINRA believes, "should be the first resource investors turn to when choosing whether to do business or continue to do business with a particular firm or individual."  However, as the PIABA study indicates, this system may not enable investors to easily obtain all the information necessary to determine whether to hire a particular FINRA registered broker.  According to the PIABA study, expungement relief was granted in 96.9% of cases from May 2009 through December 2011.
We share FINRA's view that "expungement is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted only under appropriate circumstances," and that it should be permitted "only when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value."  However, we believe that meaningful investor protection includes the disclosure of whether a customer dispute was settled.   Not just for transparency sake, but also to help prospective investors make informed decisions about which individuals or firms with whom to do business.
Given our interest in fair financial markets and transparency, we request that you provide a response to each of the five recommendations cited in the PIABA study and explain whether and why or why not FINRA intends to adopt each recommendation.  Additionally, please provide:
1.         The number of instances in which FINRA has questioned or challenged the provision of expungement relief and a detailed description of the circumstances of each case.
2.         Any draft legislative language that would be necessary to provide FINRA with the authority to ensure that expungment relief is provided "only when it has no meaningful investor protection or regulatory value," if you do not believe such authority already exists.
Please provide a response by January 6, 2014.  Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Jack Reed                          
Charles E. Grassley

Todd J. Leparski was sentenced to 60 months in federal prison to be followed by three years of supervised release, and pay restitution to IDES in the amount of $298,218.

IDES brought the case to the US Attorney General for the Northern District of Illinois, and was just made aware that sentencing occurred last week.

IDES Director Rowell said: "Stealing unemployment insurance benefits is not a victimless crime. It hurts every honest taxpayer, worker and business owner in our state," IDES Director Jay Rowell said. "Recovering stolen money and fighting waste, fraud and abuse shows that we take seriously our role in leveling the playing field and growing Illinois' economy."

DAVENPORT- On Monday, December 16 the Iowa Finance Authority and Davenport area landlords and housing professionals will be launching a new rental housing locator service for landlords to list their properties for free. Scott County has 20,000 rental units that the site aims to link with eligible tenants.

The web site will provide real-time rental unit vacancy information and other unique, advanced search components, not available on other sites. The site will launch for use by the public in January.

MONDAY, DECEMBER 16

 

TIME: 1:00 P.M.

 

LOCATION:

River Walk Lofts
420 West River Dr.

Davenport
Dad of Quadruplets Shares What He Learned Juggling Family
Life and Successful Business Career

Larry Katzen forged an ambitious career as a leader at one of the world's most prestigious accounting firms.

But he has been equally ambitious with his family life; he's the father of quadruplets?three sons and a daughter. And he felt it was important to serve his community, sitting on more than 10 boards of directors.

"It was an incredible challenge and I don't regret one minute of it!" says Katzen, author of "And You Thought Accountants Were Boring - My Life Inside Arthur Andersen," (Larryrkatzen.com), a look at working in one of the world's most historically important accounting firms while nurturing bonds with his wife and children.

"The quadruplets were born April 22, 1974, before multiple births became fairly common, so we were front-page news and featured on all the national TV news shows," Katzen says. "But that also tells you there weren't many other parents who could give us advice, and certainly no internet forums to turn to!"

At the time, Katzen was also working his way up the ladder and taking on new challenges at Arthur Andersen, one of the "Big 8" accounting firms. How did he and his wife, Susan, manage?

"It comes down to sticking to some basic principles: doing the right thing, for one, and listening to your heart," Katzen says.

He draws on his 35-year career and family life to offer these tips for working parents with multiple children:

· Cultivate support systems! One of the wonderful things about Arthur Andersen was the people who worked there, including his bosses, Katzen says. "They knew the physical and financial struggles Susan and I faced caring for four babies and, because I never gave less than my all at work, they did what they could to work around my situation," he says. That included a heftier-than-usual annual pay raise that Katzen learned only years later was approved because the firm's partners knew he would need the extra money.

Susan reached out to moms of multiples to develop her own support system, and the couple hired a recent high school graduate to help care for their rambunctious brood a couple days a week.

"There's no glory in not asking for support and help," Katzen says.

· Combine business and family. Katzen traveled frequently for his job and, when his children were 9 years old, a business friend suggested he bring them along, one at a time, on his trips.

"The first was my daughter, Laurie. We flew to New York on a Friday and spent the weekend shopping, dining, taking in a show. For the first time ever, we were alone together without any disruptions," Katzen says. "Neither of us ever forgot that weekend."

· Consider buying a small vacation home. Traveling with four young children was extremely difficult, especially nights in motels, where the family would split up into two rooms - one parent and two children in each.

"When we discovered Sun Valley, Idaho, the children were 6. On our first trip there, they quickly learned to ski, and they clearly loved the snow - we could hardly get them to come inside," Katzen says.

The family so enjoyed the vacation, they looked into the prices of condos.

"We found a furnished condo at a very affordable price and for the next 13 years, we enjoyed summers and winters in Sun Valley," Katzen says. "It may sound like a big investment, but when you consider the costs of motels and dining out for a family of six, it works out well - and it's a lot more comfortable."

About Larry Katzen

After graduating from Drake University in 1967, Larry Katzen started working at Arthur Andersen and quickly rose through the ranks to become the Great Plains Regional Managing Partner. An honorable, hard-working man who devoted his life to Arthur Andersen, Larry was there from the company's meteoric rise to its unjust demise. He stayed with the firm for 35 years, serving clients globally until 2002. In his new memoir, And You Thought Accountants Were Boring - My Life Inside Arthur Andersen, Katzen details the political fodder in the government's prosecution of Enron; how the company was unjustly dismantled for its supposed connections to the corruption; its vindication and why it came too late, and the devastating impact it had on 85,000 employees.

Statement of Senator Chuck Grassley

Finance Committee Markup of John Koskinen to be IRS Commissioner

December 13, 2013

This committee meeting breaks long-standing precedent of bipartisanship that has largely characterized how this Committee has operated.  During my tenure as either Chairman or ranking member this Committee always sought to process nominees of either party on an evenhanded and bipartisan basis.

Unfortunately, the breakdown of the rules and tradition of the Senate that recently culminated in the use of the nuclear option by Majority leader Reid has been allowed to infect the workings of this Committee.

Ranking Member Hatch, with the support of his fellow Republican committee members, requested the markup of Mr. Koskinen wait until the Committee could finish its ongoing investigation of the IRS targeting scandal.  This request was NOT a delaying tactic.  In fact, Ranking Member Hatch expressed his support for the nominee at a hearing held a little over 48 hours ago.

The ranking member made a good faith request concerning important business of this Committee.  The ranking member's sincerely held view was that it would be better for the Committee to complete the committee's bipartisan investigation into the IRS targeting scandal before moving forward.  The ranking member and I don't doubt that Mr. Koskinen fully intends to keep his promises to do all he can to assist the investigation.

The ranking member's concern, a concern I share, is about opposition he may face from within the IRS and outside of it, particularly if the investigation leads to the larger Treasury Department.

The ranking member's request is not without precedent in this Committee.  A similar request was made while I was Chairman of the Committee and every attempt was made to honor that request.

Unfortunately this has not been the case with Mr. Koskinen's nomination.  His nomination has been rushed through the Committee with lightning speed.  Mr. Koskinen's hearing was held just over 48 hours ago.  This has resulted in members having little time to follow-up with the nominee concerning questions asked of him at the hearing.

Traditionally, members of the Committee are given ample time to submit questions for the record.  This allows members to follow up on responses to questions given by the nominee during the hearing and engage in some agency oversight. Usually this committee provides at least 24 hours or longer in which to submit questions for the record.  However, for Mr. Koskinen members had at most 6 hours to submit questions for the nominee.  Given that members and their staff keep busy schedules, members were hard pressed to meet the 5 p.m. deadline that was imposed.

For such an important nomination as IRS Commissioner whose role has vastly increased because of Affordable Care Act one would expect more time for questions, not less.

Rushing this nomination through the committee has reduced the quality of the oversight Members are able to exercise.  In less than 24 hours, Mr. Koskinen was NOT able to adequately respond to written questions for the record for myself and other Members.  The answers I received back reflect this.  Many answers look as though someone copied and pasted a form response and just filled in blanks to reflect the question being asked.

I think Mr. Koskinen is very capable.  I would have appreciated him taking the time to provide thorough and substantive answers to my questions.  Instead I received promises to look at reports or learn about issues in the future.  In the past, this Committee expected nominees to answer questions before they were confirmed, but the majority will accept evidence that the nominee merely read the question.

I hope the way this nomination was handled is not evidence of how this Committee will proceed in the future.  That would be a tragedy for a Committee that has a rich tradition of bipartisanship and collegiality among members.

-30-
Notice: The opinions posted on this site are slip opinions only. Under the Rules of Appellate Procedure a party has a limited number of days to request a rehearing after the filing of an opinion. Also, all slip opinions are subject to modification or correction by the court. Therefore, opinions on this site are not to be considered the final decisions of the court. The official published opinions of the Iowa Supreme Court are those published in the North Western Reporter published by West Group.

Opinions released before April 2006 and available in the archives are posted in Word format. Opinions released after April 2006 are posted to the website in PDF (Portable Document Format).   Note: To open a PDF you must have the free Acrobat Reader installed. PDF format preserves the original appearance of a document without requiring you to possess the software that created that document. For more information about PDF read: Using the Adobe Reader.

For your convenience, the Judicial Branch offers a free e-mail notification service for Supreme Court opinions, Court of Appeals opinions, press releases and orders. To subscribe, click here.

NOTE: Copies of these opinions may be obtained from the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Judicial Branch Building, 1111 East Court Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50319, for a fee of fifty cents per page.

No. 12-0064

LARRY D. SCHAEFER and ELAINE M. SCHAEFER vs. DALE L. PUTNAM, PUTNAM LAW OFFICE, and SMP, L.L.C.

No. 12-0122

TERI ROOT vs. TALTON TONEY

Thursday, Dec. 12, 2013

WASHINGTON - Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa today received bipartisan committee approval for his child welfare policy improvements including promoting sibling connections in foster care and strengthening child support enforcement.

"Child welfare experts tell you and common sense tells you children benefit when they're kept together and have strong relationships," Grassley said.  "This legislation removes barriers to federal law that prevent families of siblings from knowing when a child is placed in foster care or siblings from losing ties when parental rights are terminated.  This will help maintain sibling relationships and in turn help the kids.

"The child support provisions help states recover money that family courts have determined is owed to custodial parents.   We ought to do more to make sure money owed gets to the parents and children who need and deserve it.  Child support enforcement helps make sure families are strong and independent."

The Finance Committee approved the Grassley provisions as part of broad child welfare legislation, the Supporting At-Risk Children Act of 2013.

The sibling provisions are based on the Sibling Connections Act introduced by Grassley and Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia this week.  The Sibling Connections Act follows the example of at least five states, including Iowa, that have passed legislation or regulation that recognizes the parents of siblings as "relatives" for foster care placement.

That means the parents of a child's siblings are notified when the child enters foster care, allowing the adult guardians to try to maintain the sibling relationships.

Also, the bill corrects the current situation in which siblings lose their status as siblings when their parents' rights are terminated.  The loss of sibling status undermines the requirement of the landmark Fostering Connections law that siblings be placed together whenever possible.

The child support enforcement measures are drawn from legislation from Grassley and Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey.   Provisions from their bill that passed in committee today would:

--Require the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to use federal and, if necessary, state child support enforcement methods to ensure compliance with any U.S. treaty obligations associated with any multilateral child support convention to which the United States is a party.

--Require states, in order to receive federal funding, to implement amendments made by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.

--Expand access to the Federal Parent Locator Service to assist states in locating noncustodial parents, putative fathers, and custodial parties to ensure compliance with their child support obligations.

In addition to the Grassley-authored provisions, the broad children's welfare bill that advanced today included several priorities of strong interest to Grassley, including reauthorizing adoption incentives; provisions to help reunite foster children with loved ones, and significant improvements to protect youth from sex trafficking.

Grassley is a long-time advocate for adoption and improving foster care, especially the challenges facing those who age out of the system.  He is the co-founder and co-chair of the bipartisan Senate Caucus on Foster Youth.  He has secured several key legislative improvements to promote adoption.  More information is available here.

Grassley is former chairman and ranking member of the Finance Committee.  He is a senior member of the committee.

-30-
Washington?Dec 12, 2013 -- U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), co-chairs of the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control, today released a bipartisan report: Eight Steps to Counter the Drug Trade in West Africa that provides recommendations for Congress and the Obama Administration to counter illicit activities surrounding the West African drug trade.

Senator Feinstein said: "The rising drug trade in West Africa has become increasingly dangerous in recent years?destabilizing governments, enriching criminal groups and funding terrorist organizations?including Hezbollah and Al Qaeda in the Land of the Islamic Maghreb. Given the threat the illegal drug trade poses to democratic gains and economic progress in the region, partnering with our allies in West Africa to combat the flow of drugs is a win-win for both the United States and the region."

Senator Grassley said: "The huge profits generated from the West African drug trade aren't just lining the pockets of drug traffickers and common criminals. Known terrorist organizations, with deep-seated hatred of the United States, use profits from drug sales to support their networks and training camps around the world. This report offers recommendations to address key weaknesses that allow the West African drug trade to flourish and fund terrorism against the United States and its allies."

 

The report recommends:

  • Strengthening the U.S.-funded West Africa Cooperative Security Initiative by developing a regional interdiction strategy that targets priority individuals and organizations in West Africa, including drug traffickers with ties to terrorist organizations;
  • Prioritizing the targeting of finances of transnational criminal groups operating in West Africa;
  • Mapping the local and international drug trafficking organizations and terrorist groups operating in West Africa and how they interact with each other;
  • Assessing where Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) highly vetted units are most needed and working with host country counterparts to establish them;
  • Providing DEA-funded clandestine methamphetamine laboratory training to West African counterparts; and
  • Encouraging West African partners to report to the United Nations on precursor chemicals for methamphetamine being shipped through their countries.

 

The Caucus originally held a hearing on the West African drug trade on May 16, 2012.

The report is endorsed by all members of the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control: Senators Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), James E. Risch (R-Idaho) and John Cornyn (R-Texas).

The entire report can be found here.

 

###

Pages