Grassley Presses Federal Judiciary to Account for Unnecessary Conference Spending

WASHINGTON - Senator Chuck Grassley is asking three circuit courts to account for spending taxpayer dollars on conferences at lavish resorts in Estes Park, Colo., Savannah, Ga., and Colorado Springs, Colo.  Grassley is the Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"There is no requirement that the federal judiciary host conferences at all, let alone at lavish resorts.  It should be an easy expense to cut, yet the federal judiciary seems to be acting like it has a blank checkbook.  Tough decisions about expenditures are being made across the federal government, and the judiciary isn't exempt.  But, you shouldn't complain about the cuts to important services while jetting off to a resort in Colorado," Grassley said.

Grassley sent letters to the chief judges of the 8th, 10th and 11th circuit courts of appeals asking for details about conferences each circuit had at luxurious resorts in Colorado and Georgia.  He previously asked the 9th Circuit Court about a conference planned for Maui, Hawaii.

Grassley first became concerned with the Judicial Conference's sequestration plans after reading an email alerting him to the drastic measures the courts would take if sequestration occured.  The email lacked any reference to actions the courts should already be taking to limit unnecessary spending, such as limiting conference expenses and travel for judges and other employees.

"It's difficult to make sense of the decision to move forward with these conferences, when sequestration loomed for over a year.  The courts have plead to Congress that they can't make additional cuts, yet, by the looks of it they aren't willing to give up their conferences at what appears to be some pretty lavish resorts," Grassley said.  "It seems to me that there is a problem with priorities."

A copy of Grassley's letter to the Honorable William Jay Riley, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit can be found here.

A copy of Grassley's letter to the Honorable Mary Beck Briscoe, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit can be found here.

A copy of Grassley's letter to the Honorable Ed Carnes, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit can be found here.

-30-

The letters Ranking Member Grassley inserted into the hearing record are attached.

 

Prepared Statement of Chuck Grassley of Iowa

Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Committee

Hearing on "Conflicts between State and Federal Marijuana Laws"

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Mr. Chairman, thank you for holding today's hearing on the conflict between federal and state laws on marijuana.

Since Congress passed the Controlled Substances Act, the cultivation, trafficking, sale and use of marijuana have been illegal under federal law.  Marijuana's continued presence on this statute's list of illegal substances isn't based on a whim.  It's based on what science tells us about this dangerous and addictive drug.  There's a process that exists to move drugs on and off that list.  But the scientific standard to do that hasn't yet been met for marijuana.

Marijuana isn't only illegal under laws passed by Congress.  It is illegal under international law as well.  The United States and over 180 nations have signed the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs.  This treaty requires the United States to limit the distribution and use of certain drugs, including marijuana, for exclusively scientific and medical use.  It's something this country gave its word to do.  And it's a commitment that our country and many others have benefitted from through improved public health.

Yet in 2012, Colorado and Washington decided to be the first jurisdictions in the world to legalize the cultivation, trafficking, sale and recreational use of marijuana.

These laws flatly contradict federal law.  Moreover, these laws have nothing to do with the controversy about whether marijuana has an appropriate medical use.  Some experts fear they will create a Big Marijuana industry, including a "Starbucks of marijuana," that will damage public health.  And it seems unlikely that we'll be able to confine that industry's effects to adults, and those within Colorado and Washington.

And the response of the Department of Justice isn't to sue to strike down the laws, or to prosecute illegal drug traffickers, but just to let these states do it.

These policies do not seem to be compatible with the responsibility Justice Department officials have to faithfully discharge their duties.  And they may be a violation of our treaty obligations.  Prosecutorial discretion is one thing.  But giving the green light to an entire industry predicated on breaking federal law is another.

These policies are another example of the Administration ignoring laws that it views as inconvenient, or that it just doesn't like.  Immigration law, Obamacare deadlines -- the list is long, and it hardly needs repeating.

But what's really striking in this case is that this Department of Justice is so quick to challenge state laws when it doesn't like or want to enforce them.  States that change their voting laws to require an ID?  See you in court.  States that try to secure their borders when the federal government won't?  Expect a lawsuit.  But if some folks want to start an industry dedicated to breaking federal law?  Well, then the Department's position is to wait and see how it all works out.

But we already have a good idea how it will work out, and the answer is badly.  Take Colorado as an example.  Since it legalized and attempted to regulate medical marijuana, what have they seen?  From 2006 to 2011, a 114 percent increase in driving fatalities involving drivers testing positive for marijuana.  Comparing 2007 through 2009 with 2010 through 2012, a 37 percent increase in drug-related suspensions and expulsions from Colorado schools.  A sharp increase in marijuana exposures to young children, many resulting in trips to poison control centers or hospitals.  And in the words of Colorado's Attorney General, the state is becoming "a significant exporter of marijuana to the rest of the country."

The statistics on this point are shocking, but not surprising, given simple economics.  From 2005 to 2012, there was a 407 percent increase in Colorado marijuana interdiction seizures that were destined for other states.  In 2012 alone, there were interdictions in Colorado bound for 37 different states.

One of those states was my home state of Iowa.  In 2010, Colorado was the source state for 10 percent of all marijuana interdicted in Iowa.  That number grew to 25 percent in 2011, and to 36 percent in 2012.  This is all before full legalization in Colorado.  What do you think this number will be next year?  Is the federal government prepared to pay for the law enforcement costs it is imposing on states like Iowa because it refuses to enforce federal law?

In 2012, the proportion of Iowa juveniles entering substance treatment primarily due to marijuana reached its highest point in 20 years.  How many more of Iowa's daughters and sons will go into treatment next year because the Department won't enforce federal law?  There is no amount of money that can make Iowa whole for that.

I have a letter from the Director of the Iowa Office of Drug Control Policy to the Attorney General that lays out some of these statistics.  The Director requests that the Department reconsider this decision.  I ask that it be included in the record.

Of course, the Department would have known many of these things had it consulted with the folks on the ground before making these decisions.  These are people who see the effects of marijuana addiction and abuse every day.  I also have here a letter to the Attorney General from many of the major state and local law enforcement organizations in the United States.  I ask that it be entered into the record.

I understand representatives of many of these organizations had asked to be consulted in advance of the Department's decision.  And they were told that they would be.

However, they wrote, "it is unacceptable that the Department of Justice did not consult our organizations - whose members will be directly impacted - for meaningful input ahead of this important decision.  Our organizations were given notice just thirty minutes before the official announcement was made public and were not given the adequate forum ahead of time to express our concerns with the Department's conclusion on this matter.  Simply 'checking the box' by alerting law enforcement officials right before a decision is announced is not enough and certainly does not show an understanding of the value the Federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement partnerships bring to the Department of Justice and the public safety discussion."

I agree.  The way these law enforcement professionals were treated is quite disturbing.

I also have a letter from all nine of the former heads of the Drug Enforcement Administration that was sent to the Attorney General yesterday.  I ask that it be placed in the record as well.  These former Administrators were appointed by presidents of both parties.  They described themselves as "shocked and dismayed" by the Department's decision.  They had also offered to meet with the Attorney General about these issues.  But, as they wrote, they "heard nothing" until the Department's announcement that wouldn't challenge these laws. These former officials offer a wealth of knowledge about the law enforcement and public health implications of these decisions.  Their treatment by the Department is simply inexplicable.

I am nonetheless grateful that the Deputy Attorney General is here today to explain the Department's decisions.  I am hopeful this hearing will be the first step toward reconsidering these misguided policies.  Thank you.

-30-

Washington, D.C. - Congressman Dave Loebsack today questioned Secretary of State John Kerry, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey during a House Armed Service Committee hearing on President Obama's request to take military action against Syria.  The witnesses also provided initial updates on diplomatic efforts to secure Syria's chemical weapons.  As the only member from Iowa who serves on the Armed Services Committee, Loebsack posed questions about what the fallout from a strike would be. Loebsack also viewed classified materials and received a classified briefing yesterday. Video of the exchange from today's hearing can be found here.

"Today's hearing was an important chance for the American people to hear directly from the Administration with initial updates on diplomatic efforts and about their case for taking military action against Syria. The use of chemical weapons against civilians is morally reprehensible and should be unequivocally condemned by the international community. While these negotiations are in a very early stage and much remains to be seen, an effective and verifiable diplomatic path forward through the international community to secure chemical weapons would be a welcome development.

"However, after more than a decade of war during which time our troops and military families have made great sacrifices on our behalf, we must exercise extreme caution in undertaking military action. There are still too many unanswered questions from the Administration including defining the end goal for potential use of force and laying out the broader implications of military action in the region. I welcome the President's address to the nation tonight and hope that he will answer these questions and provide an update on diplomatic efforts for the American people."

###

Gov. Branstad is ordering all flags in the state to be flown at half-staff from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. tomorrow to honor those who perished in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Flags will be at half-staff on the state Capitol building and on flag displays in the Capitol complex, and upon all public buildings, grounds, and facilities throughout the state. Individuals, businesses, schools, municipalities, counties and other government subdivisions are encouraged to fly the flag at half-staff for the same length of time as a sign of respect.

# # #

KANKAKEE - Lt. Governor Sheila Simon will be the keynote speaker at the 128th Annual Convention of the Illinois Licensed Beverage Association (ILBA) today, continuing her work to increase government transparency and improve business opportunities in rural Illinois.

"Having practiced at a small-town law firm, I've seen firsthand the important role small businesses play in our communities," said Simon. "I am looking forward to working with the ILBA to create business opportunities in Illinois, increase transparency and expand government accountability."

Simon will speak with ILBA members, discuss the need for increased transparency in government, encourage efforts to support Illinois businesses and launch a program in partnership with Illinois Wineries aimed at reducing teen alcohol abuse.

The Illinois Licensed Beverage Association (ILBA) boasts that it is the oldest business trade association in the country dedicated to promoting and protecting the retail businesses that sell or serve beverage alcohol. Over 2,500 Illinois retail liquor businesses (on and off-premise) belong to the ILBA, a not-for-profit corporation. Members include : taverns, restaurants, fraternal clubs, package stores, bowling centers, golf courses, hotels, gas stations, convenience stores & grocery stores.

As chair of the 25-member Governor's Rural Affairs Council, Simon is working to increase opportunities for rural residents to enhance their quality of life and support business opportunities in the state.

DATE: Sept. 10

TIME: 1:30 p.m.

PLACE: Hilton Garden Inn & Riverstone Conference Center, 455 Riverstone Parkway, Kankakee

CHICAGO - Governor Pat Quinn today released a statement regarding the passing of legendary radio host Don Wade.

"Don Wade wasn't only a legendary radio star, he was a devoted husband and father who knew the value of family.

"When you were on the air with Don, you could tell he and Roma were made for each other. Their partnership attracted millions of listeners over their historic career and set a high bar for success in Chicago radio.

"I admired not only their passion for family and compelling radio, but also their commitment to our nation's veterans. Don earned a place in Chicago's heart.

"My sincere sympathies and prayers are with Roma, Hunter, Heather and their entire family."

###

DAVENPORT, IA - On September 6, 2013, David Adair Woolison, age 34, formerly from Davenport, Iowa, was sentenced by United States District Court Judge Stephanie M. Rose to 70 months in prison, after pleading guilty to receiving child pornography, announced United States Attorney Nicholas A. Klinefeldt. 

Judge Rose also ordered Woolison to serve five years of supervised release following imprisonment, register as a sex offender, and pay $100 towards the Crime Victims Fund.  Woolison admitted to receiving child pornography from November 2008 to April 2011.

This case was investigated by the Iowa Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, Dewitt, Iowa, Police Department and the Davenport, Iowa, Police Department, and was prosecuted by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Iowa.

###

Writer-Adventurer Offers Tips for Expanding Your Horizons

No matter your politics, religion or lifestyle, the maxim "all of life is a wager" is a reliable one, says Marshall Chamberlain, a self-described recluse and, by many standards, modern-day Renaissance man.

"It seems to me that most people live in a state of inertia and pursue only the most prescribed avenues. To me, the world is much too rich not to sample what life's buffet has to offer," says Chamberlain, who has experienced life as a businessman, an officer in the U.S. Marines, husband (and divorcee), father, world traveler, boat dweller, writer and all-around adventurer. He's also the author of "The Mountain Place of Knowledge," the first book in the Ancestor Series of adventure-thrillers (www.marshallchamberlain.com).

"Spend your days putting off your dreams, and the time to realize those dreams can easily slip away. Considering time and the unknowable nature of one's expiration date, all of life is a wager. I say the time for taking action on those ideas - usually relegated to daydreams - is now."

If the weekly working grind has got you feeling like a drone, Chamberlain offers the following tips on the way to becoming a true adventurer:

· Parlay your strengths into new adventures. With a period of his life invested in the USMC, Chamberlain became accustomed to a largely physical, Spartan-like existence. After his divorce, he decided to simplify the needs of his everyday life, so he became self-sufficient, living aboard a 30-foot sailboat for the better part of 10 years. He also traveled the world, participated in activities communing with nature, and pursued his passion to become an author of adventure-thrillers.

· Make a list of what's really important to you; trim the fat soon after. To put it simply, most of us will not know in advance of our death. We know one thing: we will one day die. With a finite amount of time to wager, we simply don't have the time to watch the same bad movie every Friday night. Go big! Lose 20 pounds of fat and gain 20 pounds of muscle; or take a chance with that crush you've been nursing for six months; or buy a guitar and learn how to play it! You don't have time for a banal life.

· Become fluent in a second language (literally and figuratively): Indeed, become familiar with Spanish, French, Italian or some other language. More importantly, become fluent in a new language to approaching life. Start saying yes to ideas that you've harbored for a long time. One thing leads to another; perhaps in learning Italian you'll develop a passion for the language's rich culture. This could lead you on a trip to Italy. Who knows? The important takeaway is: Don't fear a new kind of fluency.

· Confront your fears. Are you sick and tired of the sheer predictability of your 9-to-5 existence? Nothing shrugs off the dreary residue of the daily commute than jumping out of a plane to put things in perspective. If you have a fear of heights and skydiving is too overwhelming, consider going to the top of the tallest building near you. Confronting fear not only fills you with adrenaline ... you will also likely walk away filled with confidence. But don't let the adventure stop there! Let this be a lesson in affirming life's exciting potential; keep the adventure going by testing your limits.

About Marshall Chamberlain

Marshall Chamberlain is a man focused on his passions, with no time for extraneous niceties like pets, lawns, mortgages or plants. He has a Master's Degree in Resource Development from Michigan State University and a graduate degree in International Management from the Thunderbird School, just outside of Phoenix, Ariz. He was an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps and spent many years in investment banking, venture capital, and even as a professional waiter. He is obsessed with preparedness, survival and independence. This combination of traits leads him to all manner of adventure, including serious Stone Age survival classes. Chamberlain's primary worldview is simple but profound?"I'm in awe of the magnificence of this world," he says.

by U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley

 

The resilient U.S. economy owes in large measure its global reputation for prosperity to the ideas, innovation and invention rooted deeply in our American heritage.

Flourishing from free-marketplace principles of economic opportunity and wealth creation, generations of risk-takers, entrepreneurs and high achievers went for all or nothing in pursuit of carrying out their dreams to invent the next big thing.

Throw in a work ethic driven by America's ladder of opportunity and it's understandable how the 21st century tech wizards of Silicon Valley followed in the pioneering footsteps of the Wizard of Menlo Park.

One of the most successful inventors of all time, Thomas Alva Edison is credited for coining the phrase:  "Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration."  With an inexhaustible supply of fortitude and flow of ideas, Edison holds more than 1,000 U.S. patents in his name.  From the light bulb to motion pictures and electrical power generation, Edison's scientific and engineering discoveries changed the way Americans lived.

His formula for success partly is attributable to legal protections granted by the Constitution. Article I, section 8 gives Congress the authority to "To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."  For more than 200 years, the U.S. patent system has provided a legal framework to grant inventors exclusive use of their inventions.

The patent system has helped launch amazing discoveries and advances in science, medicine, telecommunications and the arts that have made remarkable contributions to American society and a dynamic economy.

However, the patent system increasingly is being abused by individuals engaging in questionable litigation tactics for their own opportunistic gain.  These so-called patent trolls or "patent assertion entities (PAEs)" are utilizing an unsavory business model that threatens to choke innovation and invention like a noxious weed.  With no intention of developing or commercializing on the patents they own, patent trolls are giving the U.S. patent system a black eye without batting an eyelash.

Patent trolls are companies that own patents but don't create anything.  Instead, they use these patents to sue businesses and consumers.  Some of the aggressive litigation tactics of patent trolls include threatening to sue companies without specific evidence of infringement, creating shell companies to hide who is bringing the lawsuits, and asserting patent claims that are overly broad.

Abusive patent litigation saddles cash-strapped start-ups and innovators with often insurmountable financial and legal burdens.  Patent troll lawsuits also are targeting legitimate businesses and consumers.  The defendants are forced to direct scarce resources away from research, development, wage and job creation and divert those resources to defend complex patent litigation.  The majority of defendants settle out-of-court rather than challenge often questionable claims simply because it's the safer route to choose given the risky, disruptive, time-consuming and expensive nature of patent litigation.

Enough is enough.  It's time to reel in those who prey on other businesses at the expense of America's spirit of innovation and invention.

That's why I am co-sponsoring legislation with Senator Cornyn to restore the integrity and intent of the U.S. patent system.  Responsible patent holders with a legitimate legal grievance are entitled to their day in court.  But those who game the system as a personal means of jackpot justice do not.  The Patent Abuse Reduction Act of 2013 would make it more difficult to be a patent troll and easier to fight one in court.  It would require more specific information about the substance of the infringement assertions in the complaints.  It would change the incentives by adopting a "loser-pays" rule to deter frivolous or weak claims.  And, it would bring greater transparency and disclosure to identify the plaintiff filing the claim.  By pulling back a cloak of secrecy, the bill would take away a tool often used by patent trolls:  anonymity via patent-holding subsidiaries, affiliates and shells of operating companies.

Abusive patent litigation brought by PAEs now account for a majority of all patent litigation in the U.S., costing start-ups and innovators an estimated $80 billion annually in direct and indirect costs.

As Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, I've worked to balance the scales of justice in the U.S. legal system, including curbing patents on tax strategies that effectively allow tax laws to be patented and add costly burden to taxpayers.  From putting the brakes on frivolous lawsuits to reforming our medical malpractice system, policymakers need to clear litigious roadblocks that increase costs for consumers and decrease wage growth, innovation and job creation.

Patent trolls subvert the system and stifle innovation. The Patent Abuse Reduction Act would help prevent abusive patent litigation, while preserving the ability of patent holders to protect their intellectual property and investments in research and technology.  By restoring the integrity of the patent system, America's 21st century big-thinkers, hard-workers and go-getters will be able to give 100 percent in pursuit of Edison's spirit of innovation and invention and help keep America on top of our global economy.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Q:        How have patents and innovation improved our lives?

A:        Throughout the ages, people have used their brains and brawn to make life easier for themselves and society.  Each successive generation has marched down the path of progress to achieve higher standards of living and greater prosperity.  Inventors turn an idea into a product that addresses a need or solves a problem.  Consider how modernized farming practices displaced societies of hunters and gatherers.  Iowa's own Norman Borlaug is credited with saving mass starvation of a billion people through his work in high-yield, disease-resistant plant genetics.  Perhaps the most sweeping social transformation occurred during the Industrial Revolution when advances in manufacturing and mechanization helped lift a rising tide of economic growth and productivity for people around the world.  In 1903, the Wright Brothers triggered a transportation revolution that profoundly impacted global commerce and world travel.  A decade into the 21st century, the world is witnessing a new explosion of economic growth made possible by technological advances in life sciences, communications, clean energy and medicine.  Today's technologies nearly seem like the products of science fiction or yesteryear's futuristic gadgets that most people didn't expect to exist in their lifetimes.  However, thanks to the ingenuity, imagination and creativity of scientists, engineers, mathematicians, inventors and entrepreneurs, America's high tech pioneers continue to raise the bar of expectations and drive the U.S. economy forward.  Inventions can make life safer, healthier, more convenient, more fulfilling and more productive.  Just think how the washing machine "saves" time in a busy household.  America's founders recognized the value of encouraging inventors to think outside the box.  Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution authorizes Congress to develop a legal framework to promote scientific innovation and the arts.  The nation's patent laws help to spur U.S. competitiveness, innovation and job creation.

 

Q:        Why is it beneficial for an inventor to seek a patent?

A:        Since 1836, more than 60,000 Iowans have secured patents to protect the property rights of their inventions.  From the first-ever patented carousel to farm implements and medical imaging systems, Iowans from all 99 counties have navigated the patent system to protect their hard work, investment and earning potential.  The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issues patents for qualifying inventions that are considered original, useful and "non-obvious" to the marketplace.  A patent grants for a limited time legal rights to a patent holder, to exclude others from making, using, selling or importing the invention in the United States.  In exchange for these rights, the patent holder publicly discloses the invention.  The patent system offers a mutual benefit to the inventor and society, as others may study the published patent to discover new scientific advances.  Last year, the federal patent office issued about 270,000 patents with 1.5 million patent applications pending.  The average wait time for patent approval is 24.6 months.  If you have an original idea that you believe could someday fly off the store shelf, filing a patent application may be a smart business decision.  First, inventors need to do some homework.  Do some research to see if your idea already has been granted a patent.  The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office website has a searchable tool at http://www.uspto.gov.  If your invention appears patent-free, it would be wise to file a one-year provisional patent application to protect your claim and continue market research.  Filing a patent and conducting the necessary research can seem like a bewildering, costly, time-consuming undertaking.  The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recommends hiring a professional, such as a patent attorney or patent agent to prepare and prosecute your application.  As with nearly any situation, watch out for scam artists who over-promise and over-charge for their services.  Use good judgment and seek referrals to reputable patent professionals.  For more than 200 years, the patent system has worked to advance our system of free enterprise by giving risk-takers the legal and monetary incentive to build, create and invent.  Like representative government, it's a two-way street.  It strengthens job creation in America and rewards inventors who bring the next big thing to the marketplace.  Just as encouraging the next generation to get involved early in our participatory democracy strengthens our system of self-government, encouraging youth to unleash their creativity at home, Science Olympiads and science camps will help the next generation build a better, stronger America tomorrow.

 

Monday, September 9, 2013

Pages