(DES MOINES) - Gov. Terry E. Branstad and Lt. Gov. Kim Reynolds today invited Iowans to join them at 7 p.m. on Dec. 11, 2015 at the Iowa DCA's Fourth Annual Celebrate Iowa Gala.  This event will highlight and showcase Iowa's arts, history and culture.  Gov. Branstad, Mrs. Chris Branstad, Lt. Gov. Reynolds and Mr. Kevin Reynolds are all serving as Honorary Chairs for the gala.

"Chris and I are pleased to serve this year as Honorary Chairs for the gala and wish to extend an invitation to Iowans to attend the fourth annual Celebrate Iowa Gala," Branstad said. "This event will support new initiatives that promote Iowa's history and important heritage."

"Kevin and I hope that many Iowans will attend the Gala this year to support the State Historical Society of Iowa's events and programs that better connect Iowans to exhibits, interactive educational workshops, National History Day, the Preserve Iowa Summit and many more," Reynolds said.

"To date, including this year, we have raised more than $600,000 for Iowa history experiences as we celebrate all Iowa has to offer," Iowa DCA Director Mary Cownie said.  "These dollars support programs that encourage an appreciation of Iowa history and connect Iowans to the people, places and points of pride that define our state."

DCA's Celebrate Iowa Gala will be 7-11 p.m., Friday, Dec. 11, 2015, at the State Historical Building, 600 E. Locust Street in Des Moines. Visit www.culturalaffairs.org/gala or contact DCA at HistoricalGala@iowa.gov or 515-281-8352 for additional information. Tickets are available at www.culturalaffairs.org/gala.

Gala proceeds and donations through the Iowa Historical Foundation, a 501(c) 3 organization, support exhibitions and programs offered by the State Historical Society of Iowa and the State Historical Museum of Iowa.

###

GRANTED:

NUMBER

COUNTY

CASE NAME




14-0357

Scott

In re J.C.

14-0640

Polk

Ramirez Trujillo v. Quality Egg

14-0773

Black Hawk

State v. Lindsey

14-0889

Muscatine

State v. Alvarado

14-1605

Polk

Iowa Individual Health & State Univ. of Iowa

15-1256

Woodbury

In re M.W. and Z.W.

DENIED:

NUMBER

COUNTY

CASE NAME


13-0997

Black Hawk

Willock v. State

13-1259

Marshall

State v. McDowell

13-1352

Scott

Graves v. State

13-1661

Des Moines

Cannon v. State

13-1823

Johnson

State v. Doornink

14-0346

Lee (North)

Smith v. State

14-0409

Linn

King v. State

14-0727

Davis

State v. Hartman

14-1022

Scott

State v. Johnson

14-1076

Black Hawk

State v. Goddard

14-1178

Scott

Barker v. State

14-1384

Mahaska

Adams v. DHS

14-1405

Scott

State v. Cole

14-1519

Cerro Gordo

State v. Holton

14-1564

Scott

State v. Giddings

14-1590

Scott

Borrego v. State

14-1599

Scott

State v. Hayes

14-1740

Hardin

Van Den Boom v. City of Eldora

14-1818

Jefferson

State v. Blaise

14-1826

Washington

Midwestone Bank v. Harbison

14-1859

Polk

State v. Winters

14-1884

Black Hawk

State v. Provin

14-1919

Buena Vista

In re Marriage of Coon

15-0331

Polk

Great River Med. Ctr. v. Murphy

15-0761

Woodbury

In re P.D. and K.D.

15-1011

Clayton

In re H.H., M.H., and G.H.

15-1069

Woodbury

In re S.M. and V.M.

15-1105

Dubuque

In S.V., D.V., and D.B.

15-1178

Clarke

In re M.C.

15-1297

Polk

In re M.H.

15-1362

Hancock

In re J.G. and Z.P.

15-1402

Ida

In re A.J.

15-1481

Lyon

In re H.V. and F.V.


UNDER CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT:

NUMBER

COUNTY

CASE NAME


13-0739

Johnson

State v. Marshall

13-1269

Polk

State v. Dowell

13-1238

Johnson

State v. Fisher

13-1640

Des Moines

State v. Newman

13-1998

Polk

State v. Hood

13-2004

Polk

State v. Pierce

13-2033

Linn

State v. Parmer

14-0124

Story

State v. Saxton

14-0158

Scott

Hillman v. State

14-0467

Polk

Reinsbach v. Great Lakes Coop.

14-0764

Cherokee

Conklin v. State

14-0816

Linn

State v. Gathercole

14-0998

Polk

Burkett v. State

14-1004

Muscatine

Enriquez v. State

14-1021

Polk

State v. Frencher

14-1058

Scott

Alcala v. Marriott Int'l

14-1087

Black Hawk

State v. Gary

14-1142

Story

State v. Araiza

14-1143

Grundy

State v. Huffman

14-1180

Buena Vista

Estate of McFarlin v. State

14-1215

Winneshiek

Bruening Rock Prods. v. Hawkeye Int'l Trusts

14-1259

Polk

Smoker v. Bd. of Medicine

14-1273

Polk

White v. State

14-1302

Warren

In re D.L.

14-1341

Clayton

In re Estate of Weber

14-1345

Woodbury

Ledesma v. State

14-1425

Scott

State v. Romilus

14-1623

Scott

More v. State

14-1715

Emmet

State v. Kuhlemeier

14-1765

Sioux

Thompson v. ATI Prods.

14-1808

Mitchell

Spitz v. Dist. Ct.

With the 5 year anniversary of the Iowa Weapons Carry Permit law upon us, and with many carry permit holders getting ready to renew their 5 year carry permits, I thought it was important to share the information on the difference between the new carry permit and the renewal permit, as well as remind the public of the process of obtaining a weapons permit in the Scott County Sheriff's Office.

An applicant for a new permit to carry must present evidence of having completed any one of several training options at any time prior to the date of application.   In many cases, a training course that a person took in the past may have included qualification on a firing range, but qualification on a range is not a requirement to obtain a new permit - it is only an option for someone wishing to renew a permit.  If, for example, many years ago, a person completed any one of the training options specified in the law, that training can be presented to obtain a new permit.  The fee for a new permit is $54 and the permit is valid for five years from the date of issuance.

The law is clear in specifying that a person applying to renew a currently held permit must submit the renewal application at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the current permit.   A person wishing to renew a current permit is required to have received any one of several training options within the twelve months prior to the expiration date of the currently held permit, or, the applicant has the option of simply qualifying on a firing range under the supervision of a certified instructor within the twelve months before the expiration of the current permit.  The renewal fee is $29 and the permit is valid for five years from the date of issuance.

If a person who currently holds a permit does not wish to attend additional training or qualify on a firing range to renew the permit at the lower fee, a person could submit an application for a new permit less than 30 ays before the expiration of the current permit or after the expiration of the current permit, in which case the application will be considered a new permit application. Documentation of completion of any ofthe training options listed in the law, regardless of when the training occurred, will satisfy the requirements of the law, and the new permit fee of $54 will apply.

ALL applications for weapons permits, i.e. purchase permits, new carry permits and renewal carry permits, are accepted on-line ONLY through the Scott County Sheriff's Office. The on-line application can be found on the Scott County web page at www.scottcountyiowa.com/sheriff.  If an individual wishes to obtain a weapons permit but does not have access to a home computer, there is a computer in the lobby of the Sheriff's Office in the basement of the Scott County Courthouse.

SPRINGFIELD - Governor Bruce Rauner today granted ten and denied 200 clemency petitions. Nearly 1,200 petitions remain from previous administrations.

The 210 clemency petitions Governor Rauner acted upon today are part of dockets dating back to April 2007. Each person granted clemency has recently undergone a criminal background check through the Illinois State Police's Law Enforcement Agencies Data System.

A granted clemency request for a pardon with expungement allows the petitioner to seek expungement of their conviction through the court system.

This is the fifth set of petitions the governor has reviewed since taking office. The Governor's Office has developed a process to review clemency petitions on a regular basis.

For additional information on the granted clemency cases, please contact Ken Tupy at the Prisoner Review Board at (217) 782-1610 or Ken.Tupy@illinois.gov.

###

NOTICE OF COMMITTEE HEARING

The Senate Committee on the Judiciary has scheduled a hearing entitled "Oversight of the Administration's Criminal Alien Removal Policies" for Wednesday, December 2 at 2:30 p.m., in Room 226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.

By order of the Chairman.

Obama Administration Allegedly Releasing Unaccompanied Minors into Criminals' Custody

Feds Allegedly Paired Migrant Children with Human Traffickers, Child Molesters

 

WASHINGTON - Federal authorities responsible for vetting potential guardians of children who enter the country without an adult have been placing some with convicted criminals, according to whistleblower claims.  The whistleblower, who is familiar with the vetting process, alleges that at least 3,400 sponsors out of a sample of 29,000 listed in a government database have criminal histories that include domestic violence, homicide, child molestation, sexual assault and human trafficking.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) are seeking details on the review practices for potential sponsors of unaccompanied children, as well as corrective procedures once it has determined that a child has been placed with a convicted criminal sponsor. In a letter to the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Health and Human Services, the Senators are also asking for statistical information regarding criminal convictions of the sponsors of migrant children.

The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement is responsible for coordinating the screening of potential sponsors for exploitation, abuse, or other safety concerns. However, the background checks are allegedly often inadequate, leaving children in the custody of potentially dangerous individuals.  Earlier this year federal agents arrested human smugglers who reportedly posed as sponsors to force at least six Guatemalan boys to work 12 hours a day on an Ohio egg farm.

The whistleblower brought the claims to the Judiciary Committee's attention after raising concerns with supervisors reportedly yielded no immediate corrective actions.

Grassley began asking questions more than a year ago about the process for vetting the people unaccompanied minors have been released to.  These questions continue to take on urgency as unaccompanied children arrive at the southern border in record numbers in recent months.

###

Grassley to Hold Hearing on the Impact of Trade Secret Theft on American Competiveness

November 24, 2015

NOTICE OF COMMITTEE HEARING

The Senate Committee on the Judiciary has scheduled a hearing entitled "Protecting Trade Secrets: the Impact of Trade Secret Theft on American Competitiveness and Potential Solutions to Remedy This Harm" for Wednesday, December 2 at 10:00 a.m., in Room 226 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.

By order of the Chairman.

###

"Lincoln's Law" Slows Washington's Gravy Train by U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley

Iowans working six ways to Sunday to make ends meet have 18 trillion reasons to resent Washington's appetite for overspending. The soaring $18 trillion national debt reflects disregard for the taxpaying public, especially younger generations who will be saddled with a crushing tax burden to pay for unbridled Big Government.

But what really gets under the American taxpayer's skin is wasteful spending and taxes lost to fraud. There's no question about it. When the size and scope of the government grow, so do opportunities for improper payments, duplicative programs, fraud and mismanagement.

President Abraham Lincoln realized that when the federal spigot is opened for business, greed and corruption trumped patriotism when Civil War-era defense contractors siphoned off war dollars for shoddy goods and services sold to the Union Army. That's when our 16th president signed into law an anti-fraud tool to help root out unpatriotic war profiteers. The False Claims Act, also known as Lincoln's Law, allowed a private citizen to file a claim on behalf of the government for fraud.

Now it doesn't matter if it's the 19th century or the 21st, coming forward with information of alleged fraud isn't easy. It means a whistleblower is going out on a limb, putting one's livelihood and career on the line. That's why Lincoln's Law included "qui tam" provisions that offered financial incentives to provide that a citizen may share in a portion of the recovery. Bilking the government under any circumstance is morally corrupt, particularly when defense dollars assigned to U.S. Armed Forces and national security interests are squandered.

However, during World War II, the "qui tam" provisions were watered down significantly, abruptly reducing the incentives for private citizens to step forward. For four decades, Lincoln's Law collected dust on the prosecutorial shelf and arguably wrongdoers collected untold billions of tax dollars.

Throughout my service in the United States Senate, I've conducted aggressive oversight of federal spending.  From housing, transportation, welfare, health care, agriculture and defense, the revenue stream that runs through the federal bureaucracy has, unfortunately, long been considered a gravy train for unscrupulous wrongdoers. It struck me during my oversight of the Pentagon's books. The U.S. Treasury would benefit from a dose of Honest Abe. So, I worked on Capitol Hill to secure bipartisan updates to the "qui tam" whistleblower provisions that increased civil penalties and the citizen's share of recovered tax dollars lost to fraud.

Since my 1986 amendments were adopted to the False Claims Act, the U.S. Treasury has recovered $44 billion and counting. The Department of Justice says it is the nation's most effective anti-fraud weapon in its arsenal, particularly considering its widespread impact to suppress fraud and deter wrongdoers from risking criminal sentences, financial settlements and civil penalties in the first place.

Like Lincoln's Law, my whistleblower updates targeted fraud to protect the integrity of the nation's defense and military spending. Since then, the False Claims Act has cast a much wider net, capturing widespread fraud in the nation's health care, banking and financial services sectors. And I've worked to build and strengthen even more legislative and prosecutorial tools to beef up the government's ability to gut fraud throughout the bureaucracy, including:

·         whistleblower protections that prevent employers from muzzling employees with "non-disclosure agreements" that seek to gag workers from reporting wrongdoing;

·         stronger protections for programs in the IRS and SEC to encourage workers to report high-dollar tax evasion and wrongdoing in the banking and financial sectors; and,

·         passage of the 2009 Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act that targets mortgage and securities fraud.

Whistleblowers shouldn't be wronged for trying to make things right. That's why I launched the Whistleblower Protection Caucus in the U.S. Senate. We can pass legislation until the cows come home, but if we don't ride herd and scrutinize the enforcement and execution of these laws, rustlers will continue to feed at the public trough.

Taxpayers are fed up with their hard-earned tax dollars paying for a $43 million natural gas station in Afghanistan, for example. Or when mismanaged bureaucracies send farm payments to deceased farmers, deny services and benefits to veterans or put federal workers on extended paid administrative leave for months on end.  The American people deserve better. That's why I'll continue championing the work of whistleblowers who help put a nail in the coffin of bureaucratic misconduct and make wrongdoers pay for pilfering the federal government's coffers.

Cronyism, corruption and incompetence deepen mistrust and widen the credibility gap between the American people and the federal government. That's why I work so hard to derail Washington's gravy train. Let's save the gravy for the Thanksgiving turkey and mashed potatoes.

###

Policy Brief Refutes Fears of a 'Runaway Convention,' Lays Out Strategy to Unite Factions

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL - The Heartland Institute this week published a new Policy Brief that looks at the current state of the "Article V" movement - a growing movement and sometimes contentious debate among conservatives and libertarians about how to rein in a federal government that is larger, more expensive, and more intrusive than anything the framers of the U.S. Constitution could have imagined.

Titled The Article V Movement: A Comprehensive Assessment to Date and Suggested Approach for State Legislators and Advocacy Groups Moving Forward. this 40-page Policy Brief outlines how far the movement has come in the past several years and where it should go in the near future. The author, David F. Guldenschuh, is an attorney who has been intimately involved in the Article V movement for several years. He's a policy advisor for The Heartland Institute's Center for Constitutional Reform, launched earlier in 2015 to support all efforts to restore constitutional order in the United States.

"The desire for power and the influence of special-interest money has so utterly corrupted Washington, DC that citizens no longer feel their leaders and representatives are looking out for the nation's best interests," Guldenschuh writes in the Policy Brief.

Fortunately, Guldenschuh adds, the nation's Founders recognized the national government might some day overreach its authority. That is why they included in the U.S. Constitution Article V, which provides a mechanism for states to propose constitutional amendments to rein in the national government.

Guldenschuh describes four Article V advocacy groups - the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force, Convention of States Project, Wolf-PAC, and Compact for America - and reports on educational efforts undertaken by those organizations and others. He especially refutes fears of a "run-away convention." And he concludes by proposing a strategy for the movement going forward, noting:

"The Article V movement has the resources, the grassroots support, and the ability to [rein in the national government]. The question is, can leaders within the movement coordinate their efforts and cooperate with each other to accomplish this mighty goal, or will the movement devolve into a circular firing squad as unfortunately happens all too often among conservative groups? Time will tell, if it doesn't first run out on us all."

To interview Guldenschuh for an article or a broadcast, please contact Director of Communications Jim Lakely at jlakely@heartland.org and 312/377-4000, or Kyle Maichle, project manager for constitutional reform, at kmaichle@heartland.org and 312/377-4000.

About David Guldenschuh

David Guldenschuh is a leader in the nationwide movement of states to call a convention of states pursuant to Article V of the U.S. Constitution to propose amendments to the Constitution to rein in our federal government and return a balance of power and federalism to the relationship between our federal and state governments. He is publisher of the Article V Convention Legislative Progress Report, the only nationally recognized tracker of the status of all Article V legislation in the country.

Guldenschuh is former legislative liaison director for the Convention of States Project, where in 2014 he led Georgia to become the first state in the country to pass the CoS Article V application for a convention of states. He presently serves as special counsel to the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force, and is a member of the Board of Policy Advisors of The Heartland Institute, where he concentrates on constitutional reforms.

Perhaps more than any other individual in the country, Guldenschuh has established working relationships with virtually all groups and individuals working within the Article V movement. He is a 1981 cum laude graduate of the University of Notre Dame Law School, a member of the Bar of the United States Supreme Court, and has on multiple occasions been named one of Georgia's "Top Lawyers" by Atlanta Magazine.

Grassley Explores Whether Pentagon Retaliated Against Colonel Who Questioned $800 Million Afghanistan Task Force Records

WASHINGTON - Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa is seeking answers on allegations from an Army colonel that the Pentagon is slow-walking his performance review because he questioned the lack of accountability at the $800 million task force that oversaw an excessively expensive $43 million natural gas filling station in Afghanistan.  Grassley wrote to Defense Secretary Ash Carter about Army Colonel John C. Hope.

"Being long overdue, (the evaluation) has placed his next assignment in jeopardy, leaving him in limbo," Grassley wrote to Carter.  "He alleges he is being deliberately 'slow rolled' by his 'raters.'  ... Would you please look into this and find out why Colonel Hope's (evaluation) has not been completed?  I respectfully ask that you provide a deadline for completing that task and providing Colonel Hope with a new set of orders for his next assignment.  Your assistance is necessary in this case."

Grassley wrote that Hope believes he's been singled out for retaliation and retribution for speaking out about a lack of accountability at the task force.  He's been told he performed poorly at the task force, in contrast to four previous job reviews recommending a promotion to brigadier general.

"If the Pentagon is retaliating against someone for speaking out on poor accountability and wasteful spending, that's unacceptable," Grassley said.  "It's detrimental to the individual and to the taxpayers."

The now-defunct Task Force for Stability and Business Operations spent $800 million in carrying out its mission to facilitate economic development in Afghanistan.  The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) faced impeded access to task force documents in reviewing the gas station cost over-run.

Grassley has asked the Defense Department to give him all records related to task force activities pertaining to Afghanistan, from January 1, 2009, through March 31, 2015; and all records concerning the task force from April 1, 2015, to the date of his request, including all records pertaining to SIGAR's requests for information regarding the task force, and all records discussing SIGAR reports, letters, or statements about the task force.

Grassley has pressed the Defense Department to cooperate with SIGAR by releasing all documents, names of staff involved and reasons for placing severe restrictions on information behind the construction of the natural gas filling station.

He plans to seek a Department of Defense inspector general audit of the $800 million task force expenditures and will ask fellow senators to join the request.

-30-

Grassley, McCain Urge Greater Importation of Prescription Drugs from Other Countries

WASHINGTON - Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Sen. John McCain of Arizona have urged the secretary of Health and Human Services to use her full authority to increase the importation of prescription drugs from Canada and other countries for the benefit of U.S. consumers.  Their action comes as the agency  held a drug pricing forum on Friday and amid revelations of drug pricing excesses in the United States.

"As public concern over rising costs of prescription drugs continues, there is a need to reduce the financial burden that prescription drugs are placing on Americans,"  Grassley and McCain wrote to Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell.  "Given the priority that voters place on addressing the high cost of prescription drugs, we believe that it is time Congress and the Administration work together to take concrete steps to address pricing abuses."

Grassley and McCain described the significant statutory authority given to the secretary to increase the importation of prescription drugs under certain conditions, such as certification that the imported drug would be safe and reduce U.S. consumer prices.  They urged importation under certain circumstances, including significant and unexplained increases in price and that the drug is produced in another country by the name brand manufacturer that initially developed the drug or by a well-known generic manufacturer that commonly sells pharmaceutical products in the United States.

Grassley and McCain asked the secretary to outline whether she needs additional statutory authority to undertake prescription drug importation to protect American consumers.

-30-

Grassley-Cosponsored NOAA Sexual Harassment and Assault Prevention Legislation Clears Commerce Committee

WASHINGTON - The Senate Commerce Committee unanimously approved the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sexual Harassment and Assault Prevention Act to improve NOAA's response to harassment or abuse in the workplace. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley helped craft key provisions of the version that won committee approval.  The reforms follow whistleblower accounts of inadequate procedures to assist victims of abuse at NOAA.

"Victims of sexual abuse and harassment should not be forced to endure insufficient reporting and support programs in the midst of recovering from their experiences.  This bill ensures that victims have reliable access to advocates who can provide a safe place and needed guidance in a difficult time.  I applaud the Senate Commerce Committee for recognizing the need for these important reforms to protect and empower victims of abuse and harassment at NOAA," Grassley said.

The bill would require NOAA to develop policies to protect its approximately 12,000 employees.  Among its major provisions, the bill calls for:

·         Specified procedures for reporting incidents, including those occurring after business hours, at sea, or in other remote geographically isolated locations;

·         Availability of advocates to aid victims through the reporting and adjudication process;

·         Protection for the rights of accusers and the accused, including changes of duty station; and

·         Yearly reporting on the status of efforts to implement the new policies.

Whistleblowers called attention to the inadequate reporting procedures late last year when disclosing that they had been sexually abused and harassed while conducting research on behalf of universities aboard NOAA research vessels.  Their reports prompted Grassley and Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune to raise concerns with the Department of Commerce Inspector General.  They also questioned the effectiveness of the current reporting system that directs victims to disclose misconduct through the chain of command, which may include the alleged perpetrator.

The bipartisan National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sexual Harassment and Assault Prevention Act (S. 2206) was introduced on October 26, 2015, by Dan Sullivan of (R-Alaska) with Grassley and four other bipartisan cosponsors. The bill now awaits further consideration by the full Senate.

-30-

Q&A: Syrian Refugees With U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley

 

Q: Why is it important to take every precaution when considering whether to resettle thousands of Syrian refugees in the United States?

A:  Americans have a generous, compassionate spirit that is reflected in service and philanthropy, such as toy and clothing drives, food pantries and homeless shelters in communities across the country. This shared sense of humanity also is reflected by U.S. asylum policies. The United States has a long history of extending and expanding resettlement programs for those seeking sanctuary from religious persecution, ethnic cleansing and humanitarian crises. Every year, for the past few years, the United States has offered safe haven for 70,000 refugees from around the world. Iowa, in particular, has a remarkable legacy that goes back to Governor Ray's starting a resettlement program in 1975 for thousands of refugees fleeing Southeast Asia. Since passage of the Refugee Act of 1980, refugees seeking asylum in the United States must meet a legal standard of "well-founded fear of persecution" to qualify for resettlement. The Obama administration is misplacing priorities by insisting on expanding Syrian refugee resettlement, especially considering a Syrian passport was reportedly found near the body of one of the Paris attackers.

America mourns for those who lost their lives and their loved ones in the brutal massacre in Paris. America still heals from the tremendous sorrow and loss inflicted by the 9/11 terror attacks. Like America, the City of Light will find its way out of the darkness. We stand in solidarity with our friends and allies around the world. Together we must work to extinguish violent extremism that breeds terrorism and threatens life as we know it. That is why we cannot allow America's welcome mat to be turned into a door mat for radicalized Islamic extremists who are hard-wired to kill innocent people and destroy our way of life. Unless and until the United States can figure out a stringent screening process to prevent terrorists from masquerading as refugees to infiltrate our neighborhoods and communities, President Obama needs to listen to the concerns voiced by more than half the nation's governors, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle on both sides of Capitol Hill and the American people from across the entire country. So far, it doesn't appear the president is listening. That's why I am working to put at least a temporary halt on the implementation of the president's plan to resettle at least 10,000 Syrian refugees into this country until our intelligence and national security agencies can certify the vetting process will keep out terrorists. Don't forget, the U.S. paused our refugee admissions program after 9/11 to re-evaluate and upgrade security processes. At this moment, we need reasonable responses to address widespread uncertainty, not rash disregard of national security.

Q: How does this differ from the "boat people" resettlement four decades ago?

A: America's humanitarian principles haven't changed. The times have changed. Remember, Iowa was the first state to open a government resettlement agency when it welcomed the Tai Dam into our communities and took in thousands of refugees from Southeast Asia. Over the years, Iowa has resettled other refugees facing persecution in their home countries, including Bosnia, Sudan and Burma. Refugee resettlements in Iowa faced barriers back then and face challenges still today. There's no question that considerable language and cultural barriers significantly impact transitions for refugees into local communities, in neighborhoods, schools and workplaces. Resettlement strains social services and takes broad, coordinated efforts from a wide variety of government agencies, faith-based organizations and volunteers to work.

Notwithstanding the challenges with transportation and housing and the burdens on local schools, hospitals and other public services, the refugee resettlement in America should not be an avenue for terrorists to sneak in and do us harm. Like it or not, the reality of the 21st century differs significantly from just a generation ago. Today we are facing a reign of terror that recruits and radicalizes Islamic extremists to inflict violence and spread fear across civilized society. The atrocities of the 20th century were rooted in tyrannical government regimes, such as Nazism and Communism, led by the likes of Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot, who oppressed freedom and murdered millions of innocent people. Today, extremists are trying to poison peace and prosperity by orchestrating acts of terror on unsuspecting victims and venues to spread widespread fear. Today's battlefields are vastly different than 20th century conflicts. We are talking about people who have made no bones about it. Their goal is to kill Americans. From drones, to suicide bombers and hijacked airliners, the targets and times have changed. No doubt, America's leadership is needed to purge terror and make the world a safe place for our children and grandchildren. It will require bold, strategic plans with a broad coalition of our friends and allies that reaches across military, intelligence, diplomatic, financial and humanitarian channels.

However, a relatively simple way for the Obama administration to put national security first is by calling a time-out on the Syrian refugee resettlement program. The president already underestimated ISIS once before, dismissing the extremist militant group as a JV team. Now look where we are seven years into his Middle East foreign policy. Considering the misguided Iran deal, the effort to relocate detainees from Guantanamo Bay to U.S. soil and calls for resettling up to 10,000 Syrian refugees, it's no wonder Americans are questioning what else the president is miscalculating. When it comes to the safety of the American people and protecting our way of life - a way of life that generations of men and women in the Armed Forces have sacrificed life and limb to defend and uphold - the federal government has a fundamental constitutional duty to first protect national security and the sovereignty of the United States.

...FOR POSSESSION OF A SAWED-OFF SHOTGUN AND POSSESSION OF A FIREARM IN FURTHERANCE OF DRUG TRAFFICKING

DAVENPORT, IA - On November 19, 2015, Chazz Dominic Kimble, age 19, of Davenport, Iowa, was sentenced by Chief United States District Court Judge John A. Jarvey to
20 months in prison on the charge of possession and transfer of a weapon made from a shotgun, and another consecutive 60 months in prison on the charge of possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking, announced Acting United States Attorney Kevin VanderSchel.

Kimble was also ordered to serve three years of supervised release following the period of imprisonment, and to pay $200 towards the Crime Victims Fund.

On June 14, 2014, an investigation by Davenport, Iowa, police officers revealed that Kimble discharged a 12-guage JC Higgins sawed-off shotgun into the air during an altercation with rival gang members. The sawed-off shotgun was eventually recovered by police in a nearby residence. The sawed-off shotgun was modified to have a barrel of less than 18 inches, and the shotgun was not registered with the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Records, making the shotgun illegal to possess.

Kimble was indicted on October 22, 2014, on a federal charge of possession and transfer of a weapon made from a shotgun. Later that day, Kimble was stopped by police while driving in Davenport, and Davenport police executed the arrest warrant on Kimble. Subsequent to the arrest, officers found a backpack containing a loaded Accu-Tek .380 pistol and marijuana that Kimball intended to distribute. A Superseding Indictment was thereafter filed which added a charge of possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking. Kimble pleaded guilty to the charges on April 21, 2015.

This matter was investigated by the Davenport, Iowa, Police Department and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and the case was prosecuted by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Iowa as part of the Project Safe Neighborhood initiative.

# # #

DAVENPORT, IA - On November 19, 2015, Darion Daquan Gardner, age 19, of Davenport, Iowa, was sentenced by Chief United States District Court Judge John A. Jarvey to 30 months in prison on the charge of fugitive in possession of a firearm, announced Acting United States Attorney Kevin VanderSchel. Gardner was also ordered to serve three years of supervised release following the period of imprisonment, and to pay $100 towards the Crime Victims Fund.

In May 2014, the United States Marshal's Service began attempting to locate Gardner, a fugitive from Mississippi, in the Davenport area. On August 13, 2014, officers received information that Gardner was at a certain Davenport residence and was armed with a firearm. When officers went to the residence, Gardner barricaded himself in a bedroom for approximately 20 minutes, but then surrendered without incident. A stolen and loaded Smith and Wesson .40 caliber pistol was recovered in the residence. Under federal law, fugitives are prohibited from possessing a firearm.

This matter was investigated by the Davenport, Iowa, Police Department, United States Marshal's Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The case was prosecuted by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Iowa as part of the Project Safe Neighborhood initiative.

# # #

Pages