Beginning Friday, Jan. 31, ALDI, the nation's low-price grocery leader*, will offer grocery shoppers a smarter alternative as it opens its newest Iowa City store, located at 760 Ruppert Road.

 

Insurance Company EquiTrust to Open in Chicago

CHICAGO - Governor Pat Quinn today joined EquiTrust Life Insurance Company to announce that the company is opening new offices in Illinois that will create 200 jobs in the coming year and could employ hundreds more in years to come. According to company officials, EquiTrust will open their first Illinois office in Chicago, where they expect to add approximately 200 employees over the coming year. The announcement is part of Governor Quinn's agenda to create jobs and drive Illinois' economy forward.

EquiTrust also announced that Earvin Johnson is becoming a controlling shareholder of the company. Mr. Johnson is chairman and chief executive officer of Magic Johnson Enterprises.

"We are thrilled that EquiTrust has chosen to create jobs in Illinois," Governor Quinn said. "We are also excited to have Earvin Johnson become a corporate citizen of our state. His work in redeveloping urban communities has been widely recognized across the country, and this is a win-win for Illinois."

Mr. Johnson said the decision to come to Illinois was based on the state's large and dynamic economy and its pool of talented workers.

"EquiTrust's outstanding reputation and track record of helping people build for their future and plan for their retirement is a perfect example of doing well by doing good," Johnson said. "I am proud to be part of this great organization."

Magic Johnson Enterprises provides high-quality products and services that focus primarily on ethnically diverse and underserved urban communities through strategic alliances, investments, consulting and endorsements. It is comprises multiple business entities and partnerships that include ASPIRE, a new African-American television network; Magic Airport Holdings; Inner City Broadcasting Corporation; SodexoMagic, Edison Learning; Simply Healthcare; and the Los Angeles Dodgers.

"I welcome EquiTrust to Chicago and look forward to the hundreds of new employees who will be joining the most outstanding workforce in the world and calling Chicago home," Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said. "Chicago is a thriving center for the insurance industry and EquiTrust will only add to this leadership in the future."

Mr. Johnson said that he has long been a fan of both Chicago and the state of Illinois and is looking forward to contributing to the area. He is excited to begin this chapter in his business career by investing in EquiTrust and helping it innovate and grow to serve its policyholders and constituents.

"This city and state contain a vibrant business community, with an outstanding work force pool," EquiTrust CEO Jeff Lange said. "The Governor and Illinois Department of Insurance have been extraordinarily welcoming and helpful in assisting us in our efforts and for that we are appreciative. We are pleased to be here. We believe it is an excellent place from which to continue implementing EquiTrust's growth strategy and find increasingly better ways to serve the company's various constituents."

Illinois is attracting new and expanding businesses because of its superior transportation network, highly educated work force, culture of entrepreneurship, access to capital and competitive cost structure.

"EquiTrust Life Insurance Company is a welcome addition to the life insurance and annuities market in Illinois," Illinois Department of Insurance Director Andrew Boron said. "It's a well-rated company with relatively new ownership, which should provide increased choices for consumers in Illinois' competitive insurance environment."

EquiTrust Life, which also has offices in Des Moines, Iowa, distributes fixed-rate and indexed annuities and life insurance through a national network of more than 14,500 independent agents. EquiTrust Life is rated BBB+ (Good) by Standard & Poor's and B++ (Good) by A.M. Best Company. Guggenheim Partners, LLC, a diversified financial services firm, announced that certain of its affiliates acquired the company from its previous parent, FBL Financial Group, Inc., in 2011.

Mr. Johnson also has roots in Chicago's educational landscape and in September of 2013 was joined by Governor Quinn to launch his new organization, "Friends of Magic." The movement aims to provide at-risk students with the tools they need to graduate high school and have a successful future. The announcement took place at the newly established North/South Lawndale Magic Johnson Bridgescape Academy, one of two Chicago-area blended-learning programs that provide students who have dropped out or are at risk of dropping out of school with a free alternative path to earn a high school diploma in an environment that fits their schedule, life circumstances and learning needs. Magic Johnson Bridgescape Academies are currently in six states with a total enrollment of 1,675.

Under Governor Quinn's leadership, the state of Illinois has identified, recruited and supported companies with the potential to bring jobs and economic growth to Illinois. The state has added 281,400 private sector jobs since January 2010, when job growth returned to Illinois following nearly two years of consecutive monthly declines.

For more information on why Illinois is the right place for business, visit Illinoisbiz.biz.

About Magic Johnson Enterprises

Magic Johnson Enterprises was formed in 1987. For additional information, visit www.magicjohnson.com.

About EquiTrust

For additional information, visit www.equitrust.com.

###
Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Senator Chuck Grassley today commented on the inclusion of two provisions that will help solidify the future of the Rock Island Arsenal in the Omnibus Appropriations Bill for Fiscal Year 2014.  The bill resulted from a budget agreement between the House and the Senate.  Both chambers are expected to act on the appropriations bill this week.

"It's good news that this effort is moving forward. The capabilities of the Rock Island Arsenal have proven their value time and again and are a vital backstop in wartime.  This measure will help secure the long-term viability of the Arsenal," Grassley said.

The first provision requires the Secretary of the Army to maintain a workload that allows the Arsenal to sustain critical capabilities for when they are needed in time of war.  Those levels were determined in the Army Organic Industrial Base Strategy Report, released in August 2013.  The report resulted from a mandated study that was first proposed by Grassley with U.S. Senators Tom Harkin of Iowa and Mark Kirk and Dick Durbin of Illinois as part of the Army Arsenal Strategic Workload Enhancement Act of 2012 and authorized in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.

The second provision ensures the Arsenal's competitiveness by providing additional funding through the Arsenal Sustainment Initiative.  This will help the Arsenal compete more effectively for partnerships in the private sector.

The provisions were included by Durbin with the support of the entire Rock Island Arsenal delegation: Grassley, Harkin and Kirk along with U.S. Reps. Dave Loebsack of Iowa and Cherri Bustos of Illinois.

-30-

See below; and response from Jeremy Funk, Communications Director, Americans United for Change: "We're sure API President Jack Gerard just made an honest math error and forgot to carry nine zeroes somewhere in his calculations.  Seriously, if big oil can lie so shamelessly about the taxpayer subsidies everyone knows they reap, why should the EPA believe a word of their trash talk about the renewable fuels industry?  Big oil wants nothing more than to be rid of their cheaper, cleaner competition, so whatever they say about ethanol during this critical comment period on the proposed RFS rule must be taken with a grain of tar sand.   Big oil may get a lot more than zero in tax payer subsidies, but there is exactly zero chance that big oil will ever come close to producing enough domestically to meet U.S. oil consumption.  That's why it makes no sense to abandon the renewable fuels industry now at a time it's fulfilling 10% of our nation's fuel needs and at a time it's making incredible innovations that will fulfill more and more demand down the road."

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/01/09/1423351/oil-zero-subsidies/

 

Big Oil Lobby Claims The Industry 'Gets No Subsidies, Zero, Nothing' 

BY REBECCA LEBER  ON JANUARY 9, 2013 AT 2:23 PM

Despite ranking among the most profitable corporations in the world, Big Oil benefits from $4 billion in annual tax breaks. It fights to maintain them through aggressive political donations, lobbying, and heavy ad spending, but also employs another tactic: Pretending these tax breaks don't exist.

"The oil and gas industry gets no subsidies, zero, nothing," API President Jack Gerard said on Tuesday. "We get cost-recovery benefits, much like other industries. You can go down the road of allowing economic activity, generating hundreds of billions to the government, or you can take the alternative route by trying to extract new revenue from industry by increasing their cost to do business."

Tax deductions are indeed subsidies, as API admitted in a document that labeled "subsidies for alternative fuels" as "preferential tax treatment." And the oil industry's $4 billion preferential treatment is written permanently into the tax code. These include :

Percentage depletion allowance: lets companies deduct the costs of an oil or gas well, about 15 percent, from its taxes.

Domestic manufacturing tax deduction: Allows oil companies to collect $1.8 billion each year, even though there are vast differences between oil and traditional U.S. manufacturing. It is a benefit that was never intended for them, according to Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican, who said Congress included oil producers "almost inadvertently."

The foreign tax credit: Oil companies overwhelmingly fall into the category of companies that can claim credits for payments to foreign governments.

Expensing intangible drilling costs: For over a century, oil companies have written off wages, fuel, repairs, and hauling costs.

ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips have paid federal tax rates well below the 35 percent top corporate rate, a far cry from paying "more than our fair share". ExxonMobil, for instance, paid a 13 percent tax rate in 2011, after drilling deductions and benefits, and 14 percent on average between 2008 and 2010.

The record-high gas prices of 2012 reinforce the decades of data showing domestic drilling has very little impact on gas prices. At the same time, the Big Five companies are on track to collect more than $100 billion profit this year.

Q:        What does the Federal Reserve do?

A:        The Fed was created to stem fault lines in the financial system that many argued bred depositor runs, interest rate spikes and market speculation in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  The case was made in Congress that the ebb and flow of a growing U.S. economy needed more certainty and that a system was needed to manage money and the flow of credit.  The law that created the Fed -- the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 -- established staggered terms for presidential appointees to serve on the Board of Governors who also required a congressional green light of approval via the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.  Today appointees serve 14-year terms intended to help insulate monetary policymaking from politics.  Unlike the centralized banking systems of its international counterparts, the Federal Reserve System established a dozen regional banks known as the Federal Reserve District Banks to serve and reflect the diversity of each respective region.  Today they are located in the 12 original cities selected a century ago, including Boston (District 1), New York (District 2), Philadelphia (District 3), Cleveland (District 4), Richmond (District 5), Atlanta (District 6), Chicago (District 7), St. Louis (District 8), Minneapolis (District 9), Kansas City (District 10), Dallas (District 11), and San Francisco (District 12).  The Board of Governors and the Reserve Bank presidents meet eight times per year.  The Fed will launch its centennial year under new leadership with the Senate's approval in January of Janet Yellen to serve as the 15th executive at the helm of the seven-member Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. For the last 100 years, the Fed's primary responsibilities have included setting monetary policy, supervising the soundness of financial institutions and providing payment services to banks.  I've worked to require increased transparency of Fed activities and sponsored legislation to allow independent audits of the Federal Reserve by the Government Accountability Office, which is the investigative arm of Congress, and require that meaningful information about Federal Reserve operations be disclosed to Congress.

Q:        How does the Federal Reserve impact Americans?

A:        As the saying goes, money makes the world go round.  The Fed sets monetary policy that influences the supply and cost of credit.  As people go about their daily lives, from paying bills, buying goods and services, cashing or depositing checks or taking out a car or home loan, the policies set by the Federal Reserve affect these basic transactions and influence consumer behavior and decisions on whether to save, spend or invest.  The Fed provides financial services such as providing banks with currency and coin; moving money electronically between banks; and maintaining the U.S. Treasury's account, including processing electronic payments, such as Social Security checks.  In 2012 the Fed processed $4.2 trillion in payments per day.  By managing the money supply and influencing interest rates, the Fed plays a policymaking role to curb inflation, boost consumer confidence and trigger commercial activity.  Whereas the Federal Reserve manages the supply and demand of money, Congress sets the nation's fiscal policy through tax and spending policies that play a hand in consumer confidence, saving and investment up and down Main Street.  I'm committed to lowering the tax burden so the American public and job creators can keep more of their hard-earned money to save, spend, hire and invest as they see fit.

Q:        Why did you vote against Janet Yellen's nomination to chair the Federal Reserve?

A:       Under the leadership of Chairman Ben Bernanke, the Fed has flooded the economy with trillions of dollars since the economic recession hit in 2008.  Through an unconventional policy of buying mortgage-backed securities and longer-term Treasury securities, the Fed has created an addiction to easy money by Wall Street.  With significant uncertainty surrounding the Fed's ability to wind down $4 trillion of accumulated assets, it risks repeating the mistakes of the past.  The easy money policies of the late 1970s and early 1980s led to a painful recovery with interest rates reaching as high as 20 percent.  No one wants a flashback to this period of hyperinflation and high unemployment, least of all Main Street.  In fact, the Fed's so-called tool of quantitative easing hasn't buoyed Main Street's prognosis for long-term growth and stability.  Consider that unemployment remains too high, bank lending remains too tight and savers today are too often discouraged.  My concerns about the Fed's easy money policies and inflation led me to vote against Chairman Bernanke for his second term at the Fed.   Based on her statements, it seems that Janet Yellen will continue to pursue these misguided policies, and I couldn't in good conscience vote for her confirmation.  History shows the inflationary risks of easy money can do more harm than good.  This is a watershed moment for the Fed.  Continuing an open-ended monetary expansion policy may capsize the recovery by creating an economic bubble or even hyperinflation.  We need a chairman focused on a strong dollar and low inflation.

Friday, January 10, 2014
Financial Planner: Another 2008-style Economic Disaster
Could Happen Again, Suggests New Kind of Diversity

While the world is still feeling the long ripples of the economic meltdown that began six years ago, our economic institutions remain "too big to fail" - at least in the minds of  millions of retired Americans and those soon to join their ranks, says veteran financial advisor Curt Whipple.

"That's what we see when we review their retirement portfolios," says Whipple, a Certified Wealth Strategist, Certified Estate Planner and CEO of C. Curtis Financial Group. He recently published "Retiree Lifeline! How to Get Government Out of Your Pocket," (ccurtisfinancial.com), a retirement planning guide.

"I see it all the time: a new client comes in with what they believe to be a 'diverse' portfolio. While it may be diverse in terms of Wall Street holdings, a solid retirement plan also requires diversity outside of a system that's 'too big to fail,' which could fail yet again."

When Wall Street falls, it shouldn't mean that Main Street must as well. Whipple outlines the three kinds of money retirees should have available for enjoying the golden years with peace of mind.

• Red money ... can be defined as that which is tied to Wall Street, by far the most popular kind of investment, including stocks, bonds and mutual funds. "I've been looking at the accounts of new clients for nearly three decades, and on average, 92 percent of their retirement plan is based in these investments," he says. "That's risky, especially as you get closer to retirement age or once you retire. You don't want 92 percent of your retirement premised on that kind of potential volatility."

• Blue money ... is often referred to as "alternative investments," which typically include Real Estate Trusts (REITS), equipment leasing programs, precious metals such as gold and silver, high grade rare coins and collectibles. "This 'color' of money has been an important portion of the pie for success in my clients' investments; they were essentially unaffected by our recent economic collapse because they were so well diversified." This is a highly advantageous part of a portfolio because it historically creates good income with a low correlation to the stock market.

• Green money ... is accounts that come with a guarantee of some sort. They are either backed by the FDIC, the Legal Reserve System, which is supported by the insurance industry, or insurance companies themselves. "Not all wealth is created equally, and this is the safest kind of money you can have in your retirement plan," he says. Green money includes investments in one's portfolio that have guarantees to not lose one's principal and, sometimes, one's earnings.

"Investment in Wall Street should be much lower for those who are either retired or are about to be retired," Whipple says. "Depending on a person's age, a good investment portfolio could include about 36 percent red money, 32 percent blue money and 32 percent green money."

About Curt Whipple, CWS, CEP

Curt Whipple, Certified Wealth Strategist (CWS) and Certified Estate Planner (CEP), is Chief Managing Partner at the C. Curtis Financial Group, which he formed in 1986. Since then, Curtis Financial Group has counseled and advised individuals and corporations on their financial goals and decisions. Whipple is a nationally recognized speaker.

Surprise, It's Not Only About The Price!

Corporations are holding record levels of cash, interest rates are low and the housing market is rebounding. The result? Merger and acquisitions professionals are buying more businesses and high-end homes are selling faster -- Silicon Valley had a 26 percent increase in sales of $1.5 million-and-up houses in the first half of last year.

If you're considering selling a business or property in 2014 - while business is good and before mortgage rates climb - keep in mind: Focusing only on the price can short-change you in the long run.

"A lot of sellers are rushing to close the deal because they're worried about what may be around the corner," says attorney John Hartog of Hartog & Baer Trust and Estate Law (www.hartogbaer.com). "My first rule: Sell smart, not fast."

Sales of commercial properties were up 11 percent in the third quarter of last year, notes wealth management advisor Haitham "Hutch" Ashoo, CEO of Pillar Wealth Management (www.pillarwm.com).

"These sales can constitute a significant money event, so you have to consider how they may impact your future lifestyle needs," he says.

Adds CPA Jim Kohles, chairman of RINA accountancy corporation (www.rina.com):

"And you have to factor in how the transaction will affect your tax position. A great sales price doesn't look so good if it costs you more in taxes."

The three offer these tips for a successful business or residential property sale:

  • Know the true value of your business! A surprising number of entrepreneurs have an unrealistic idea of what their business is worth, says attorney Hartog. He tells of a man who owned a large chain of fast-food franchises. "He told everyone he knew the business was worth $150 million. After he died ... the business was sold for $35 million." That resulted in a drawn-out lawsuit by relatives of the man who accused the sellers of under-valuing the company. "Whether you're selling a business or real estate, get it appraised," Hartog advises. "It may sound obvious, but I've seen savvy business owners make big mistakes due to delusions of value."
  • How confident are you that the transaction will help you maintain the lifestyle you want? Before their clients take one step toward moving forward on a significant sale, wealth managers Ashoo and his partner, Chris Snyder, analyze how it might affect them in the future. "This is a must-do step. You need to have confidence that this money event will help you maintain your lifestyle until you're in your 90s," Ashoo says. He and Snyder run the transaction through an  economic simulation factoring in major world and financial events since 1925, then use the information to project its future effect on the client. "If we're not 75- to 90 percent confident that it will help them reach their goals and maintain their lifestyle, we advise the develop a Plan B -- or not sell at all."

 

  • The pre-tax price and the after-tax price must both be part of the negotiations. Getting the highest price for your business won't result in the most net gain if you end up paying a high tax rate on the proceeds, notes accountant Kohles. If you sell the shares in your company, you'll pay a lower tax rate. If you sell the physical plant, you'll pay a higher rate. In the first case the buyer is on the losing end of the tax question; in the second you are. "You have to package the deal so that there are some tax advantages for both of you; this is where having professional help is crucial," he says. If you've taken depreciation on the equipment, you'll pay a higher rate. Sales of some assets, such as patents, are taxed at the lower capital gain rate. Selling your goodwill - elements of the business that relate to the value of your relationships - allows your buyer to write off depreciation.

About John Hartog, Haitham "Hutch" Ashoo  & Jim Kohles: John Hartog is a partner at Hartog & Baer Trust and Estate Law in Orinda, Calif.  He is a certified specialist in estate planning, trust and probate law, and taxation law. Haitham "Hutch" Ashoo is the CEO of Pillar Wealth Management, LLC, in Walnut Creek, Calif., specializing in client-centered wealth management. Jim Kohles is chairman of the board of RINA accountancy corporation of Walnut Creek, Calif. He is a certified public accountant specializing in business consulting, succession and retirement planning, and insurance. All three advise ultra affluent families.

Extension cleared Senate procedural hurdle earlier today

Washington, D.C. - Congressman Dave Loebsack released the following statement after the Senate cleared a procedural hurdle and is set to vote on extending unemployment benefits that expired last month. Loebsack joined a number of his colleagues in calling on the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, to address the expiration of the benefits.

"At a time when many Iowans are still struggling to find work, I am pleased the Senate took this action to extend unemployment benefits. Now it is time for House leadership to do the same and bring this bipartisan legislation to the floor. It is beyond irresponsible that these working families have had to face the possibility of not being able to feed their families or keep the heat on this winter. These benefits provide a critical lifeline to individuals and families who have been hit hard by these difficult economic times. As someone who was raised in poverty, I know what it is like to sit around the table each month and wonder how my family would make ends meet. The House needs to act now."

###

Author Michael Hib has created in 'BOOMERVILLE: Getting Off the Corporate Merry-Go-Round' an eye-opening read on how to survive and thrive in today's economy

COVINGTON, Ga. - The Baby Boomers generation has always been fortunate. This is due to the fact that most of them were born after the Second World War and have reaped the economic and moral benefits of the times. Therefore they have reaped the benefits of a higher income and better working conditions and benefits in their lifetime. But with a huge majority of baby boomers reaching retirement age and the world economy in shambles, the collective fates of all baby boomers seem uncertain. In "BOOMERVILLE: Getting Off the Corporate Merry-Go-Round" author Michael Hib has written a helpful guide on how the baby boomer generation can survive and thrive in the new economic arenas.

"BOOMERVILLE: Getting Off the Corporate Merry-Go-Round" shows how as millions of baby boomers head toward retirement and to new ventures, the world in which everyone lives in is shrinking rapidly. Many more countries attempt to become an economic player and US competitor as the global economy emerges. Rapidly expanding technologies and communications are enabling more countries to become borderless within a global economic community of creative destruction ? competitors on a global stage and 24 hour global clock. This highly informative book shows readers how millions of retiring baby boomers getting off the corporate merry-go-round will play a crucial role as freelancers and free agents in bridging the gaps in skills, talent, business wisdom, and sustainability.

This eye-opening and helpful read is a must have for all baby-boomers who wish to survive in the ever changing economic landscape of the times.

Floor Statement of Senator Chuck Grassley

Nomination of Janet Yellen to be Fed Chairman

Delivered Monday, Jan. 6, 2014

Over the past five years the Federal Reserve has pursued unconventional and unprecedented monetary policy.  As vice chair of the Fed, Janet Yellen has been a strong proponent of these policies.  As chair, she is likely to continue these same easy money policies with the same, if not more, vigor than her predecessor.

I have deep concerns about the long-term effects of pursuing these policies.  Historical evidence suggests that failing to rein in easy money policies on a timely basis risks fueling an economic bubble or even hyperinflation.

It is true that one of the lessons learned from the Great Depression was that an overly tight monetary policy in a recession risks economically debilitating deflation.  Thus, understandably, when the recession hit in 2008 the Fed sought to avoid the mistakes of the past by lowering interest rates to encourage investment.  However, this expansionary monetary policy cannot continue into perpetuity without causing real and lasting damage to our economy.

Just as we should not repeat the mistakes of the Great Depression, we need to be careful not to repeat the mistakes that fueled our recent recession.  Let us not forget that our current economic stagnation began with the bursting of the housing bubble in late 2007.  A housing bubble fueled by rampant speculation that was driven, in part, by historically low interest rates maintained by the Fed between 2001 and 2004.

Yet, once again we see the Fed embarking on a policy of sustained historically low interest rates.  The Fed has now maintained the Federal Funds rate essentially at zero for over five years.  What may be the future consequences of this policy?  What new bubble will arise?  At this point, I do not think anyone can answer these questions definitively.  But no one can deny that the risks are real and could be devastating.

The Fed though has not just sought to maintain record low interest rates.  With its traditional monetary tool tapped out, the Fed has turned to a less conventional and more aggressive program in an attempt to jumpstart our economy and lower unemployment.

The Fed is now engaged in an open-ended policy it has termed quantitative easing.  Essentially, this is a fancy way to say the Fed is flooding the economy with trillions of dollars through large purchases of mortgage-backed securities and longer-term Treasury securities.  As a result of this program, the Fed has seen its balance sheet more than quadruple from around $800 billion to nearly $4 trillion.  Vice Chairman Yellen has not presented a plan to Congress on how the Fed plans to deal with this issue.

While I welcome the news from the Feds' December meeting that it intends to reduce the monthly purchases, I fear it may already be in too deep.  It remains unclear how the Fed will be able to go about unwinding its nearly $4 trillion balance sheet without spooking investors.

The stock market has become addicted to the Fed's easy money policies.  This has led one notable investment advisor to question whether the Fed will ever be able to end the quantitative easing program.

While the stock market has become addicted to easy money, the benefit to Main Street has been questionable at best. Unemployment remains high, bank lending remains tight, and savers discouraged.

While the benefits to Main Street remain unnoticeable, Main Street most certainly will feel the pain should the Fed carry on its easy money policy for too long.

For an example of what Main Street could be in store for, one need look no further than the late 1970s and early 1980s.  The easy money policies of the 1970s intended to spur employment resulted in stagflation, a period of hyperinflation and high unemployment.  During this period unemployment topped 10 percent while inflation exceeded 14 percent.

The experience of the late 1970s and early 1980s made it clear that once you let the inflation genie out of the bottle it is very difficult to stamp it out.   After suffering years of stagflation, Americans were then subject to the pain of unprecedented interest rates as high as 20 percent just to get hyperinflation back under control.

Statements by Ms. Yellen indicate she would be open to inflation exceeding the fed target of 2 percent as a means to achieve full employment.   While achieving full employment may be a noble goal, the Fed has a dismal record at being able to produce sustainable job creation through expansionary monetary policy.

While inflation may aid employment in the very short term, our experience with stagflation in the 1970s shows this tradeoff falls apart quickly as people's expectations change.  Sustainable job growth comes not from inflation, but price stability that promotes long-run economic growth.  We need a chairman focused on a strong dollar and low inflation.

My concerns about the Fed's easy money policies and inflation led me to vote against Chairman Bernanke for his second term at the Fed.   Because it appears that Ms. Yellen will continue to pursue these misguided policies, I cannot in good conscience vote in favor of her confirmation.

-30-

Pages