Washington, D.C. - Congressman Dave Loebsack released the following statement on the newly released rule for the implementation of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. The rules require health insurance to cover both mental and physical health equally by prohibiting plans from limiting mental health benefits. Since the passage of this historic law in 2008, Loebsack has been pushing the Administration to issue a final rule so the law could be fully implemented.

"As someone whose mother struggled with mental health issues, I have experienced firsthand the necessity of timely and proper care. I am incredibly pleased that the final rule for the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act has been issued. Mental illness is just that: an illness. Those who need access to treatment should not face additional burdens because their suffering is mental rather than physical.

"As a result of this law, patients who seek mental health treatment will no longer face higher out of pocket costs or arbitrary limitations on their services. It is my hope that this will prompt those who have been reluctant to seek treatment due to the financial burden to get the help that they need.

"This is an important step towards addressing the mental health needs of all Iowans, but there is still more work to be done. We must continue to break down the stigma that surrounds asking for help as well as improve access to services in our schools for struggling students, and I will continue to fight for these goals."

###

Obamacare Shopping for Christmas: Eric Tyson Answers 10
FAQs from Americans Who Got the Dreaded Cancellation Letter

The holiday season is almost upon us, but if your health insurance has been
canceled, you're likely feeling anything but festive. Financial counselor and
bestselling author Eric Tyson answers questions he's hearing?and offers advice
on how to cope with the stress and confusion of health insurance shopping.

Hoboken, NJ (November 2013)?You'd love to spend the next month and a half decking the halls, enjoying festive parties, and shopping for gifts for your family and friends. Unfortunately, if you're one of the millions of Americans who buy their own health insurance, the "silver and gold" that will dominate your thoughts this holiday season is the silver and gold (and bronze and platinum) designations of the Obamacare health plans.

That's right. Millions who buy individual health insurance have received letters from their providers (or will soon receive them) saying their policies have been canceled because they don't meet the requirements of the Affordable Care Act. Often the letters suggest a "similar" ACA-compliant plan that is?surprise!?a lot more expensive.

"For most of the recipients these letters are an unwelcome holiday surprise," says financial counselor Eric Tyson, New York Times bestselling author of Personal Finance For Dummies®, 7th Edition (Wiley, 2012, ISBN: 978-1-118-11785-9, $22.99). "They feel blindsided. In many cases they worry about whether they can afford hundreds of dollars more a month in premiums or pay a steeper deductible than before."

ACA supporters point out that the ACA-compliant "replacement" plans are pricier because they offer more benefits?but many people chose their (now canceled) plans precisely because they didn't want or need, say, maternity coverage or prescription drug coverage. When you pay for your own health insurance you tend to make educated purchasing decisions aimed at conserving costs and getting value for your money, notes Tyson.

"Many of these people are self-employed and have unpredictable cash flows, or perhaps they found the individual marketplace offered a better value than a spouse's group plan," he adds. "They deliberately bought high-deductible plans to keep premiums low. Let's say you're a middle-aged woman with a home-based business. Since you're past childbearing age you chose a catastrophic plan without maternity coverage?and now you're finding out that's no longer an option. It's upsetting."

Tyson says he has fielded many questions from people seeking to understand the new health insurance rules and their personal finance implications. Here are some of them along with Tyson's answers:

Why did my policy get canceled?

Individual plans that were in effect as of March 23, 2010, were "grandfathered," meaning that you get to keep them even if they don't meet the standards mandated by the ACA. However, if the policy has been altered since that date?i.e., if the deductible, co-pay, or benefits changed at all?you can't keep it. Most policies have been changed since that date, for a variety of reasons, so they are being canceled.

In addition, people who buy individual health insurance tend to change plans often anyway?so some people are losing coverage because they changed insurance policies in, say, 2011.

"I've seen estimates that as many as 80 percent of individual policies will end up being canceled," notes Tyson. "So if you haven't gotten a letter yet, chances are you will."

Yikes! On the policy my insurance company recommended to replace my canceled one, the premium has doubled and the deductible has gone up by thousands of dollars. How can this be?

It's because of the essential health benefits that, by law, must be included in new insurance policies that take effect in 2014. These include maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, prescription drugs, pediatric services (including dental and vision care), to give a partial list. In the past you were able to pick and choose from plans that excluded some of these services and thus were less expensive.

Plus, the ACA includes "consumer protection" provisions that have elevated prices. For example, it prohibits health insurance companies from limiting or excluding coverage related to preexisting health conditions. In order to absorb this cost and costs related to other provisions, insurance companies have raised rates across the board.

Is my family eligible for a subsidy?

It depends on your family income and how many children you have. Beginning in 2014 subsidies will be available to qualified individuals and families whose incomes fall in the range of 138 percent to 400 percent of the poverty line (assuming they buy a policy on a government exchange). At the top of the spectrum, an individual making just under $46,000 would be eligible for a subsidy, as would a family of four earning around $94,000.

"If you are self-employed and end up receiving subsidies, be careful to keep track of your earnings," warns Tyson. "If you end up making more than you thought you would in a given year, you could end up having to pay back part of your subsidy. Of course, the converse is also true: If you make less than expected, you may receive a refund."

What happens if I don't replace my canceled policy?

If you do not replace your canceled policy with a qualified health plan, you will have to pay a penalty fee on your tax return. The penalty fee for 2014 is $95.00 per adult and $47.50 per child (up to $285) or 1 percent of your annual income?whichever is greater. This penalty rises sharply thereafter; in 2016 it will be $695 per adult and $347.50 per child (up to $2,085.00) or 2.5 percent of annual income?again, whichever is greater.

Wouldn't it be smarter to just pay the penalty? (It's much cheaper.)

Certainly, some people will choose to go this route. Tyson has noted some anecdotal evidence suggesting that an "If I get sick then I'll get insurance since people with preexisting conditions can't be turned down" mindset is prevalent.

One problem with this strategy is that beginning in 2014 you can purchase subsidized health insurance (barring special circumstances like the birth of a baby) only during Open Enrollment?between October 15 and December 7 of each year. If you miss that window and get diagnosed with a serious illness in January you would have to wait many months to buy coverage on the government exchanges.

You can, however, purchase a policy outside the exchange at any time?but Tyson says banking on the ability to get insured quickly enough is risky.

"A major car accident or illness can happen too quickly to allow you to buy a policy," he notes. "The medical bills that you would rack up almost overnight could devastate most people financially."

How long do I have to choose a new policy?

To avoid a penalty fee you must apply for a Qualified Health Plan by March 31, 2014. This deadline was extended from February 15 due to serious problems with the healthcare.gov website. But don't let the extension make you complacent, warns Tyson.

"If your current health insurance policy expires at the end of 2013, you will still need to make a decision by December 15 to be covered by your new policy on January 1," he notes.

How can I find the best policy for me?

There are several ways to do so. You can visit either healthcare.gov or your state's exchange if you think you might be eligible for a subsidy. If you have an independent insurance agent you like and trust, it might be best to call her.

Regardless of how you purchase your insurance you will find that qualified health plans have one of four designations: bronze, silver, gold and platinum. Bronze plans have the lowest monthly premiums and the highest out-of-pocket costs. Platinum plans are the opposite: They have the highest premiums and the lowest out-of-pocket costs.

"Generally, the high-deductible bronze plans are the way to go for most relatively healthy people," says Tyson. "They have the lowest premiums. You just have to be disciplined enough to set aside money for the higher out-of-pocket costs that could occur. In fact, choosing a bronze plan that's compatible with a Health Savings Account is even better, as it allows you to set aside money for medical expenses on a tax-free basis."

I've talked to several insurance agents and insurers and have heard conflicting information. How can I know what to believe?

Obamacare is deeply confusing and not just to consumers. The insurance company employees and agents have to learn many new rules and regulations and this takes time. That's why Tyson suggests you talk to several different insurers and agents and do a fair amount of research before making a decision.

"It's important to invest some time in this decision," he notes. "A woman told me she was looking for an HSA-compatible plan and, at first, her insurance agent told her the company was no longer offering them. The agent had been told this by two insurance company representatives. After making several more phone calls and asking some probing questions, the agent found out the company representatives had been wrong. If something doesn't sound right, it pays to keep questioning."

Why is this happening only to individual policyholders? Is it going to affect people who get their insurance through their workplace?

Basically, most group policies already had more comprehensive (and expensive) coverage in place that met more of the standards of the ACA. So far it appears that most larger employer plans are seeing smaller changes. However, some employers are choosing not to offer coverage, asking employees to cover more of the cost, or deciding to go with more part-time employees (fewer than 30 hours/week) for whom they don't need to provide coverage.

"To see exactly what happens to most group coverage we'll just have to wait," notes Tyson. "Almost certainly, though, some smaller businesses will face rate increases?and how this directly affects employee pocketbooks will vary wildly."

It seems that this has happened to a lot of people in my state. However, I have heard from people in other states that their costs haven't increased. How can this be?

There are various reasons for the disparity. Experts suggest that costs spiked more dramatically in states that have fewer regulations on insurance to begin with. Thus, states that previously did not require insurers to provide benefits like preventative care and contraceptives now have to?so their prices necessarily rise. Also, in general, states where more insurers are competing for customers will have lower prices.

"The truth is, Obamacare is helping some people in the short-term and hurting others," says Tyson. "As a financial counselor it is not my place to offer an opinion on whether this law is a positive or negative force for our country. I can only advise individuals to educate themselves, seek out the best value for their needs and their wallet, and go into this transaction?like any transaction?with their eyes open."

# # #

What Now? Five Ways to Cope with Higher Health Insurance Prices
Eric Tyson, bestselling author of Personal Finance For Dummies®, 7th Edition
(Wiley, 2012, ISBN: 978-1-118-11785-9, $22.99), offers insurance
shoppers a few tips for making the most of their new reality.

· Don't just go with the plan mentioned in the cancellation letter. Shop around. When you hear people say, "My premium doubled!" they are generally referring to the comparable plan the insurance company suggested in the cancellation letter. But Tyson says not to take the number so literally?it's the price of just one of the possible plans available to you.

"Call your agent and ask to see a side-by-side comparison of various plans," he suggests. "Check out other companies. If you are eligible for a subsidy, check out the exchanges. Chances are you'll find something a little more reasonable if you're willing to make tradeoffs in the area of deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses."

· Be patient and do your homework. "Talk to as many insurers and agents as you can," advises Tyson. "Spend some time on the computer. Ask friends and colleagues what they're doing. While you do need to be mindful of the end-of-the-year deadline, you don't want to rush into what is really a very important financial decision.

"Plus, keep in mind the deadline has already been moved once," he adds. "You never know, if the website problems don't get straightened out, it could be delayed again."

· If you go with a bronze plan, consider one that is compatible with an HSA. A bronze plan may be best for people who are generally healthy. These have the lowest premiums. Of course, they also have the highest deductibles, which means that in the event you do get sick, you'll have to cover more of your costs out of pocket. And that, says Tyson, is why it's important to select a bronze plan that's compatible with a Health Savings Account (not all of the bronze plans are).

Here's how it works: You open a Health Savings Account at your bank and contribute as much to it as you can each year. Because contributions are tax deductible, the government sets limits on how much you can set aside. In 2013 the limit is $3,250 for an individual and $6,450 for a family. In 2014 these numbers will go up to $3,300 and $6,550 respectively. This money grows, tax free, year after year so that you can use it to pay medical expenses that aren't covered by your health insurance policy.

"I have always recommended HSAs as a great tax-saving strategy, and now that deductibles are so high, they make more sense than ever," notes Tyson.

After all, if you have to have a high deductible anyway, it makes sense to at least get the tax break on the out-of-pocket expenses you have to pay.

· Do what you can to get and stay healthy. Chances are you will now be paying more out of pocket for non-preventative care, so good health has to become priority one, notes Tyson. Of course, health insurance is needed because some conditions are unpreventable, but there are plenty of others you can affect with lifestyle improvements.

"Obviously, if you smoke, stop now?smoking is the only 'preexisting condition' health insurance companies are allowed to charge you more for," he says. "But it's also important to start eating more healthfully, exercising, and losing weight if you need to. The healthier you are, the less you'll need to seek medical care?and the less you'll have to pay out of pocket for your care."

· Look for places to cut costs. Like it or not, many people are just going to have to come up with more money to pay the higher premiums and deductibles required under the Affordable Care Act. And most people do have some excess "fat" that can be trimmed from their budgets. We can dine out less, bargain shop, cut out expensive cell phone and cable plans, take less expensive vacations. In short, we can simplify?and that's not necessarily a bad thing, says Tyson.

"Some people may find that Obamacare is the impetus to reevaluate how they're living their lives," he notes. "Challenges have a way of bringing priorities into sharper focus. No one wants to pay more for their health insurance?but instead of focusing on the anger and fear we may be feeling, we can focus on slowing down and paying more attention to friends, family, simple joys, and the things that really matter in life."

# # #

About the Author:
Eric Tyson is an internationally acclaimed and bestselling personal finance book author, syndicated columnist, and speaker. He has worked with and taught people from all financial situations, so he knows the financial concerns and questions of real folks just like you. Despite being handicapped by an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business and a BS in economics and biology from Yale University, Eric remains a master of "keeping it simple."

After toiling away for a number of years as a management consultant to Fortune 500 financial-service firms, Eric took his inside knowledge of the banking, investment, and insurance industries and committed himself to making personal financial management accessible to all.

Today, Eric is an accomplished personal finance writer. His "Investor's Guide" syndicated column, distributed by King Features, is read by millions nationally. He is the author of five national bestselling books, including Personal Finance For Dummies, Investing For Dummies, and Home Buying For Dummies (coauthor), among others, which are all published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Personal Finance For Dummies was awarded the Benjamin Franklin Award for best business book of the year.

Eric's work has been featured and quoted in hundreds of publications, including Newsweek, the Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, Forbes magazine, Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, Parenting magazine, Money magazine, Family Money magazine, and Bottom Line/Personal magazine; on NBC's Today show, ABC, CNBC, PBS's Nightly Business Report, CNN, and FOX-TV; and on CBS national radio, NPR's Sound Money, Bloomberg Business Radio, and Business Radio Network.

Eric's website is www.erictyson.com.

About the Book:
Personal Finance For Dummies®, 7th Edition (Wiley, 2012, ISBN: 978-1-118-11785-9, $22.99) is available at bookstores nationwide, major online booksellers, or directly from the publisher by calling (877) 762-2974.

The press has done a very good job of reporting about the challenges our veterans face.  We all have read or seen stories about our wounded warriors.  About traumatic brain injury.  About veterans suffering from depression and other serious mental health issues. About those who have lost limbs or endure other physical hardships.

These are serious issues that deserve our attention, especially on Veterans Day.  What also deserves our attention, but which gets much less press, is the fact that military veterans are twice as likely to develop - and die from - Lou Gehrig's Disease as those who have not served in the military.

Yes, studies show that the disease that took the life of baseball legend Lou Gehrig is striking our military heroes at an alarming rate.  It doesn't matter when or where they served in the military; home or abroad, peace or war, from World War I to Afghanistan.  Those who served are at greater risk.

ALS is horrific. Worse than your worst nightmare.  It robs people of the ability to move, trapping them inside a body they no longer can control. People describe it as being buried alive.  There is no treatment.  No cure.  Only death in an average of two to five years.  I have personally witnessed the tragedy of this disease, as my father suffered from it for nearly six years.  It eventually cut his life short at a young age of 54.

So as the press calls attention to our military heroes on Veterans Day, I hope they remember those heroes who are fighting for their lives against ALS.  I encourage your readers to visit the Wall of Honor at www.alsa.org. There they will see the faces and read the stories of the military heroes who are fighting ALS and those who have been lost to the disease.  Their stories of courage are worth your attention this Veterans Day.

Sincerely,

Gina Gilliland Cox

Friday, Nov. 8, 2013

WASHINGTON - Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah today released enrollment data from the four health insurance companies participating in the Washington, D.C., exchange set up via the President's health care program.  The Obama Administration has refused to provide enrollment numbers to the American people.

CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield: two enrollees from Oct. 1, 2013, through Oct. 30, 2013.

Kaiser Permanente: three enrollees from Oct. 1, 2013, through Oct. 31, 2013.

UnitedHealthcare: no enrollment data from the exchange as of Nov. 4, 2013.

Aetna:  no enrollment data as of Oct. 24, 2013.

"A lot of Americans are getting cancellation notices from their current health care plan but they haven't been able to enroll in a new plan," Grassley said.  "The limbo and uncertainty are stressful for them, as they've been describing in emails to my office.  The chaos imposed on so many people is reason to at least delay the individual mandate, if not outright repeal it."

"With numbers like these, it's no wonder the Obama Administration hasn't wanted to release how many people have signed up for ObamaCare," said Hatch.  "With data from DC's four participating health plans in, there's been a whopping five people enrolled in the city's exchange. That's right five. Whether it's significant problems with the website, people being forced off the coverage they had or skyrocketing costs, these numbers are even more proof of what a disaster ObamaCare is and why it should be delayed."

On Oct. 24, 2013, Grassley and Hatch wrote to the four companies participating in the Washington, D.C., health care exchange.  The Washington, D.C., exchange has four major plans and so provides a snapshot of how Americans fare in trying to join the new exchanges.

Grassley and Hatch said news reports show problems with what are called "834 forms" that contain individual information that insurers use to enroll the individual in a health care plan.   Inaccurate or corrupted data would interfere with successful enrollment.  That has implications for when the Administration should enforce the individual mandate requiring enrollment.  It would be unfair to penalize people for not having health insurance when technical problems have impeded their enrollment, Grassley and Hatch said.

The responses the senators received are available here, here, here and here.

-30-

This week Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testified in front of the Senate Finance Committee.  As a member of this committee I had many questions for her.  In particular, I questioned the consequences of whether health care plans participating in the Affordable Care Act are subject to key anti-fraud protections.

Secretary Sebelius stated in a letter to a House member that qualified health plans, programs related to the federally facilitated marketplace, and other programs under the Affordable Care Act are not considered federal health care programs.  I questioned whether this means Obamacare programs are not subject to federal anti-kickback statutes and the federal False Claims Act.

Secretary Sebelius argued that the federal exchanges offer plans from private insurers that should not be subject to anti-fraud protections.  This alarms me.  Billions of dollars in subsidies for individuals going to health insurers to join Obamacare are federal tax dollars.  Those dollars should be subject to anti-fraud laws.  Medicare Advantage also offers plans from private insurers and is subject to those same anti-fraud provisions.  I question why the two programs should be treated differently for federal anti-fraud protections.  Both involve direct payments from the government to private health care plans.

I intend to do everything I can to get to the bottom of whether the federal agency in charge of Obamacare will apply every available anti-fraud protection to this program.

WASHINGTON - Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa is seeking answers from the Obama administration on indications that Obamacare will bypass key anti-fraud protections.

"I am alarmed at indications that the Administration may try to exempt the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) from certain federal anti-fraud provisions," Grassley wrote to top administration officials today.  "PPACA provides for billions of dollars in subsidies to be paid directly to insurance companies.  These taxpayer dollars should be subject to the full arsenal of civil and criminal anti-fraud protections provided by Congress."

Grassley's letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Attorney General Eric Holder came amid statements that the administration does not consider qualified health plans and other programs related to the federally facilitated marketplace under the new health care law to be federal health care programs.  That appears to mean the Obamacare programs are not subject to federal anti-kickback statutes and the federal False Claims Act, one of the government's most effective tools against fraud, especially health care fraud in recent years.

Grassley raised these concerns at a Finance Committee hearing with Sebelius on Wednesday.  He asked her to explain her letter to a House member that the Obamacare health plans are not considered federal health care programs.  She suggested Medicare Advantage, for example, and Obamacare should be treated differently for federal anti-fraud protections.  Grassley believes both programs should be treated the same for anti-fraud purposes, since both involve direct payments from the government to private health care plans.

"Congress' intent to treat kickbacks under PPACA as False Claims Act violations is clear.  It cannot lawfully be nullified by the stroke of a pen through an administrative exemption," Grassley wrote today.  "If this nullification were allowed to stand, HHS would be removing a vital tool to investigate and prosecute fraud.  It undermines public confidence that the government is serious about protecting American taxpayer dollars from fraud, waste and abuse.   Intentionally attempting to strip away these vital protections by administrative fiat is extremely disturbing."

Grassley is the Senate author of the 1986 whistleblower amendments strengthening the federal False Claims Act, making it more effective than ever in exposing fraud against the government.

The text of Grassley's letter to Sebelius and Holder is available here.

-30-

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa today questioned whether the federal agency in charge of implementing the Affordable Care Act appreciates the consequences of whether health care plans participating in the program are subject to key anti-fraud protections.

"I'm alarmed that the Obama administration doesn't understand the capacity for fraud in the new health care program," Grassley said.  "The head of the agency in charge doesn't seem to appreciate that the billions of dollars in subsidies for individuals going to health insurers to join Obamacare are federal tax dollars.  Those dollars should be subject to anti-fraud laws.  Why wouldn't they be?"

At a Finance Committee hearing today, Grassley asked Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to explain her letter to a House member that qualified health plans and other programs related to the federally facilitated marketplace and other programs under the Affordable Care Act are not considered federal health care programs.  Grassley questioned whether that would mean Obamacare programs are not subject to federal anti-kickback statutes and the federal False Claims Act, one of the government's most effective tools against fraud, especially health care fraud in recent years.

Sebelius argued that the federal exchanges offer plans from private insurers that should not be subject to anti-fraud protections designed for taxpayer-funded federal programs.   After Grassley pointed out that Medicare Advantage also offers plans from private insurers and is subject to those anti-fraud provisions, Sebelius argued that the exchanges were different from Medicare Advantage because of the direct payments from the government to the insurers.  However, after the hearing, Grassley questioned whether Medicare Advantage and Obamacare should be treated differently for federal anti-fraud protections, since both involve direct payments from the government to private health care plans.

Adding to the confusion, the department put out guidance this week saying it "has broad authority to regulate the Federal and State Marketplaces" and "discourages" providers from giving premium support and other help to enrollees.  The guidance is available here.

"I intend to do everything I can to get to the bottom of whether the federal agency in charge of Obamacare will apply every available anti-fraud protection to this program," Grassley said.

Grassley is the Senate author of the 1986 whistleblower amendments strengthening the federal False Claims Act, making it more effective than ever in exposing fraud against the government.

-30-
Experienced Caregiver Warns Those New to Insurance
Coverage: Speak Up

With 11,000 people becoming eligible for Medicare every day and an estimated 25 million Americans expected to gain health insurance through Obamacare on Jan. 1, access to doctors and hospitals will skyrocket.

And while that's a positive, patient advocate Ruth Fenner Barash warns that the U.S. health care system is not the benevolent safety net many people believe it to be. It can be abusive, incompetent, callous toward patients - and worse.

"Patients and their loved ones cannot blindly turn themselves over to this massive, technology-based system and trust that it will care - or take care of them," says Barash, who shares her health-care experiences in a new book, "For Better or Worse: Lurching from Crisis to Crisis in America's Medical Morass," (http://forbetterorworsebook.com/).  The cautionary tale traces the long death of her husband, Philip, through a medical journey fraught with mismanagement and excess, useless interventions and a sometimes complete disregard for pain - even when there was no hope of healing.

"We did experience some wonderful health-care professionals - brilliant, compassionate and helpful people - but they were not the rule," says Barash. "I learned a great deal from our experience, and with so many people now gaining access to health care, I want others to benefit from what I've learned. You can navigate the system; you just have to know how."

Barash offers these suggestions for patients and their loved ones, whether it's a trip to the doctor for a checkup or a diagnosis of a catastrophic illness.

• Avoid the emergency room. Emergency rooms were developed with the idea that few people would use them - most people would see their physician. But as health care costs rose, they became a primary care facility for those without insurance or the money to pay for services out of pocket. "Patients and their families were not expected to spend a long  time in the E.R. - presumably, they would be seen quickly and either admitted to the hospital or treated and released - so they're not designed for comfort," Barash says. "They've become very crowded, especially in cities, and patients might wait for hours sitting in hard plastic chairs in the waiting room. For someone who's sick or injured, this can be torture."

Sick people usually are not isolated, so waiting rooms also teem with germs, she notes.

• Be skeptical - question everything. Too often, we take the first thing we're told as gospel, Barash says. "If you have the luxury of time, take some of that time to think things through, to research and get second opinions," she says. Research your physician's connections. When you're referred to a specialist,  ask why that particular person. If you live in an area with a large academic community, ask around about the physicians and health-care providers with the best reputations. Who has the most experience in a particular niche? Who's doing the most promising research? How many times have you performed this procedure and what is your success rate?

• Ask what it costs - no matter who's paying. Our health-care system is absurd in the number of useless consultations, diagnostic procedures and interventions it foists on patients, Barash says. Whether our  hospital bills are fully covered by Medicare, Medicaid or private insurance, or we're paying a portion ourselves, we must all include cost in our discussions with health-care providers. "Part of the blame for having the most expensive health-care system in the world goes to us, the individuals, who don't question purchases or shop for prices as we would for groceries, clothing, or furniture," Barash says.  "If a test or consultation is ordered, understand why. Is it really necessary? You can say no!"

Finally, Barash says, we all must come to terms with the fact that death is a given. "My husband's problem, and the problem many of us may be doomed to face, is the seemingly endless getting there - a dying we don't want."

About Ruth Fenner Barash

Ruth Fenner Barash studied philosophy at City College of New York and did graduate work at the University of Chicago. In 1958, she met and married Philip Barash, a private practice attorney. She went on to work in public relations and real estate, served education and civic organizations at the executive level, and taught art in various media. Her long marriage was a "harmonious adventure" despite the couple's treacherous journey through the health-care system. Her husband died in 2012.

David Schroeder, DPM, FACFAS, of Davenport, Iowa was elected President of the Iowa Podiatric Medical Society (IPMS) during the organization's annual Business Meeting in October. The organization represents Doctors of Podiatric Medicine (DPMs) in Iowa who serve an important role in keeping Iowans on their feet -- active and healthy.

Dr. Schroeder has been a member of the IPMS for over 20 years. During that time he has made substantial contributions to the leadership of the Association, including serving as a Director to the IPMS Board and chair of the IPMS Insurance Committee. He practices with the newly formed Quad Cities Foot and Ankle Associates in Davenport, IA.

Dr. Schroeder is Board Certified in foot surgery by the American Board of Podiatric Surgery (ABPS) and a fellow of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (FACFAS). Dr. Schroeder is also wound care certified.

After completing his undergraduate work at the University of Iowa, Dr. Schroeder earned his Doctor of Podiatric Medicine degree from the Dr. Wm. M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine in Chicago, IL in 1989. Dr. Schroeder is on staff at UnityPoint Medical Center, Genesis Medical Center and the Mississippi Valley Surgery Center.

The Iowa Podiatric Medical Society (IPMS) is the professional organization representing over 140 medical and surgical specialists of the foot and ankle, located throughout the state of Iowa. Doctors of Podiatric Medicine (D.P.M.) are physicians and surgeons who provide comprehensive services ranging from routine foot care to sophisticated foot surgery. Doctors of Podiatric Medicine are also involved in examining and treating patients diagnosed with diabetes, and those at risk for the disease, to assist them in avoiding possible complications, such as foot ulcers and amputations. For more information on IPMS, call 515-282-8192 or visit www.ipms.org.

Woman Living with Incurable Cancer Offers 3 Ways to Get
the Most Out of Every Day

Jane Schwartzberg cringes when she hears someone say that a terrible accident or frightening medical diagnosis made them realize what's important in life.

"In some ways, I do wish everyone could experience a taste of terminal, if that's what it takes to make them appreciate the intangible gifts we receive not just during the holidays, but all year," says Schwartzberg, co-author with Marcy Tolkoff Levy of "Naked Jane Bares All," www.nakedjanebaresall.com, a new book that shares Jane's story with candor and humor.

"But I wish they'd known all along, and I hate the thought of goodness coming at the expense of so much suffering."

Schwartzberg says she was clear about what's most important before she was diagnosed with stage four incurable breast cancer. As a mother, wife, daughter, sister, aunt and friend, she knew that all that really matters is how much love we give and receive.  
The holidays are a wonderful opportunity for people to remember that and to focus on who they love. But, too often, they become a source of anxiety, stress, and tension. Financial concerns, having too much to do, and missing loved ones were among the top causes of holiday stress, according to a recent Mental Health America survey.

"Although I won't attribute any revelations about what's most important in life to my illness, I can say that there are a few things that I am trying to do better since getting sick," Schwartzberg says.

"The holidays are a great time to cultivate a spirit of gratitude and to re-focus on the things that are most meaningful."

For Schwartzberg, those include :

• Showing up. If you're worried about yesterday or always planning for tomorrow, you're missing the present moment and any wonderful experiences it may hold.

"Although my clock ticks louder than others, I know we are all here for a short time," Schwartzberg says. "I am determined to find joy in every single day. It may come from the simplest of things: a view from my window, a great conversation or a hot cup of coffee. But I know I need to be always present and available, with an open mind and open heart, to experience any of it."

• Riding her love train. We all have people in our lives who care about us, and it's important to let them know how much we appreciate them. Schwartzberg's "love train" is a metaphor for all of the people she chooses to share her life with.  "They are rooting me on and giving my family and me love and support," she says. "I try to be as meticulous and thoughtful as I possibly can be with those on board, and that means making sure they know how much I love and value them."

• Knowing my place in the world. There is a Jewish teaching that says everyone should carry with them two pieces of paper, each in a separate pocket. One paper should say, "I am but dust and ashes."  The other, "The world was created for me."

"I constantly remind myself that both statements are true," Schwartzberg says. "I am capable of incredible things to improve the world, and I am just a tiny speck in the universe. Powerfulness and humility can, and do, exist for me side by side."

As the holidays approach, keep in mind that the best gift you can give - or receive - is love.

"It's not a table full of food or gadgets you can't afford," she says. "Approach this holiday season as if it could be your last, and you'll probably find much more to revel in than to stress about."

About Jane Schwartzberg

Jane Schwartzberg, 45, is the co-author of the newly released book, "Naked Jane Bares All," the many-layered story - told with humor and candor -- of how she learned to embrace life when she was down for the count. Jane is a financial services executive and founder and former CEO of a start-up technology company.

"Naked Jane Bares All" was co-written by veteran writer Marcy Tolkoff Levy. Following a year of interviews and many late nights with Jane, her family and friends, Marcy formed the foundation of a colorful, poignant and even humorous collection of vignettes about how Jane continues to get back up when life throws her down.

Pages